• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

Does this surprise you? An unwillingness to acknowledge that words sometimes have more than one meaning, or shades of meaning, is pretty standard amongst the CT types. They're simply not very good at dealing with ambiguity.

No it doesn't surprise me at all.

Nothing surprises me with truthers anymore.
 
And her Lawyer is here defending No Planers and trying to get us to buy her book so he can get PAID his fees.

Shame it's not working, I wouldn't read that waste of paper even if Jammy PAID ME to.
 
p313073-New_York_NY-WTC_Statue.jpg

World_trade_center_new_york_city_plaza_fountain.jpg

Sphere_before_Sept_11.jpg


Good thing we've got Google or who knows what we'd believe. What a retard.
 
Last edited:
From Jude the Mental's site.

''I do not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.''

Pardon?

It means that she is suspending judgment on that point. There is nothing at all odd about that.

There are many propositions which I have no opinion on. I do not believe that the 10^80th digit of pi is 7. I also do not believe that it is not 7.

Unfortunately, in plain English, the phrase, "I do not believe X," often means "I believe X is false." Just another unfortunate ambiguity in natural language.
 
No it doesn't surprise me at all.

Nothing surprises me with truthers anymore.

We really do need to establish some new terminology. I am a truther. I collaborate with a lot of very intelligent and capable truthers (as well as non-truthers). However, no planers, directed energy beamers, P4T and CIT'rs are NOT truthers. I prefer to call them "twoofers" (a term I picked up from someone here at JREF). Some, I even call nutjobs. These types are not interested in "truth". They exist in a world of paranoia and delusion that is quite scary if the "truth" be told. Sadly though, their nutty ideas get all of the attention and discussion. As you will see in my signature, I had a falling out with the "truth movement" simply because they would not self-govern themselves and weed out the nutjobs. I don't want to be associated with such types, so until I "retired" from my research, I sought out some of the sane folks to continue corroborating with. Much of the data in the public domain are the direct result of their efforts to obtain it, often fighting tooth-and-nail with government agencies who lied, evaded and resisted every step of the way (some of that continues now).

So yeah, there really does need to be a better classification system.
 
My point is that the plane crash theory is not capable of turning a steel building into dust. After this "crash", all you have is an office fire. Office fires can't do that.

There was no dust. What you think you saw was a holographic projection of dust. What you found was leftover foam rocks from the faked moon landing. Can't you get anything right???
 
It means that she is suspending judgment on that point. There is nothing at all odd about that.

There are many propositions which I have no opinion on. I do not believe that the 10^80th digit of pi is 7. I also do not believe that it is not 7.

Unfortunately, in plain English, the phrase, "I do not believe X," often means "I believe X is false." Just another unfortunate ambiguity in natural language.

Right, so why didn't she just say she is "suspending judgement" instead of making herself look even more of an idiot?
 
We really do need to establish some new terminology. I am a truther. I collaborate with a lot of very intelligent and capable truthers (as well as non-truthers). However, no planers, directed energy beamers, P4T and CIT'rs are NOT truthers. I prefer to call them "twoofers" (a term I picked up from someone here at JREF). Some, I even call nutjobs. These types are not interested in "truth". They exist in a world of paranoia and delusion that is quite scary if the "truth" be told. Sadly though, their nutty ideas get all of the attention and discussion. As you will see in my signature, I had a falling out with the "truth movement" simply because they would not self-govern themselves and weed out the nutjobs. I don't want to be associated with such types, so until I "retired" from my research, I sought out some of the sane folks to continue corroborating with. Much of the data in the public domain are the direct result of their efforts to obtain it, often fighting tooth-and-nail with government agencies who lied, evaded and resisted every step of the way (some of that continues now).

So yeah, there really does need to be a better classification system.

Yes, when you put it like that I agree. I know a few truthers personally and I respect them. They are polite, respectful of other people's opinions and capable of rational discussion.

People like Dusty and Jammy are not truthers, neither they do not deserve respect. They certainly are not interested in the truth.
 
How do you know the "No Planers" really aren't just a bunch of your own fellow Government Truthbots trying to discredit the opposing side through methods of "cognitive infiltration"?

Most 9/11 Truthers say nothing because they realize Judy Woods most likely works for your side, not ours.

And you definitely want this opposition that Judy works for to win, so you say nothing rather than pointing out that it's stupid.

Right.

ETA: Well, I suppose it makes about as much sense as any other Twoofer position.
 
Last edited:
[qimg]http://photos.igougo.com/images/p313073-New_York_NY-WTC_Statue.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://static.newworldencyclopedia.org/9/9f/World_trade_center_new_york_city_plaza_fountain.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3k2ilY9vkCY/TNxh2Pbg9CI/AAAAAAAAB9s/IxS4pXw1tSU/s640/Sphere_before_Sept_11.jpg[/qimg]

Good thing we've got Google or who knows what we'd believe. What a retard.

Man, the base appears to be the only thing that is identical to the way it was cast in the 1960's, and the PhD thinks it is evidence of No Planer conspiracies.

There is no face palm big enough.
 
9-11 The Musical

To the tune of Sandra Dee from Grease!



Look at me, I’m Tracey Bee
Lousy with incredulity
Won’t go to bed ‘til I’m baked in the head
I can’t; I’m Tracey Bee

Watch it! Hey I’m Dr. Jay
Buy my book, so I can eat today
Due to the cost
Even Hutchinson lost
His mind to Dr. Jay

I don’t think (no)
Or care (no)
I don’t foam my hair (dew)
I get off from one cigarette
( wink, wink, wink)
Keep you filthy laws
Off my silly flaws
Would you pull that crap on Harrit?

As for you Quad 4 7 2
I know what you wanna dew
You got my dust
I’m no object of trust
I’m no planer Tracey Bee

Mackey. Mackey, let me be!
Keep those factsies away from me!
Just ‘cause you’re cool
And I’m acting the fool
Hey foamtool, I’m Tracey Bee
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom