Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[WTC Dust]

Interesting display of cargo cult thinking here. Somebody (in a room) operated a computer keyboard; that's how it works; that's how it was done.

It reminds me of the kid in Max Max: Beyond Thunderdome who keeps trying to send radio messages by playing with the knobs and switches on a disconnected control panel. Because that's how it works; that's how it's done.

That kid character has an excuse; he's just a kid and he lives in a world where real knowledge of how radio works is unavailable to him. Even though it's fiction, his beliefs and actions are plausible in context.

No-planers', not so much.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Many amazing instruments and gadgets are controlled by a computer.

I think my cartoon has validity because it explains what I think people physically did on 9/11. They went inside a room and controlled the machinery. They didn't go to an airport, pass box-cutters through security, and the rest.

 

[BasqueArch]

Originally Posted by DGM
That's the bad guy that killed the two good guys. Try to keep up.

So who shoots him?

The cameraman of course. Everyone forgets about the cameraman.

Also the hologram thesis explains the shrieking jet engines full throttle sounds heard in NJ and NY, the RADAR tracking, and the 20" sway of the TTs as the holograms impacted.

 

[Resume]

Real video. Faked plane.

And no evidence for yet another of your fantasies.

 

[pgimeno]

Are you aware that such evidence would also match your hypothesis?

It's basically the dragon in your garage.

How so?

Obvious. If they could project the plane, they could project the explosion bits and the wake.

If you didn't notice, the dragon in your garage is a reference to Sagan's:

http://godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/Dragon.htm

 

[Redwood]

Interesting display of cargo cult thinking here. Somebody (in a room) operated a computer keyboard; that's how it works; that's how it was done.

It reminds me of the kid in Max Max: Beyond Thunderdome who keeps trying to send radio messages by playing with the knobs and switches on a disconnected control panel. Because that's how it works; that's how it's done.

That kid character has an excuse; he's just a kid and he lives in a world where real knowledge of how radio works is unavailable to him. Even though it's fiction, his beliefs and actions are plausible in context.

No-planers', not so much.

Respectfully,
Myriad

I saw the 1926 science-fiction film, Metropolis, as a teenager. (Not in its original run!)

There's a scene where some schlub worker has to direct electricity to where it's most needed by moving a huge dial. The first thing I thought was, "Why, with their super technology, don't they just automate the process?"

Likewise, why is a human necessary to "pull the trigger" on the Death Star? And them have him killed? Why not program the Death Star for its function, and set it to auto-execute?

Another example of "Rube Goldberg's Razor" in conspiracism.

 

[Resume]

Many amazing instruments and gadgets are controlled by a computer.

I think my cartoon has validity because it explains what I think people physically did on 9/11. They went inside a room and controlled the machinery. They didn't go to an airport, pass box-cutters through security, and the rest.

Next, Dr. Evil will blackmail us for . . . One Million Dollars! Bwaahaaahaaa!

 

[R.A.F.]

Many amazing instruments and gadgets are controlled by a computer.

Irrelevant.

I think my cartoon has validity because it explains what I think people physically did on 9/11.

You think it is "valid" because you agree with it???

You really do not know how science works, do you.

They went inside a room and controlled the machinery. They didn't go to an airport, pass box-cutters through security, and the rest.

Your "opinions" are valueless...you have "exposed" yourself as a credulous believer, thereby making your claims irrelevant.

 

[R.A.F.]

deleted...

 

[Myriad]

Many amazing instruments and gadgets are controlled by a computer.

I think my cartoon has validity because it explains what I think people physically did on 9/11. They went inside a room and controlled the machinery. They didn't go to an airport, pass box-cutters through security, and the rest.

Your narrative so lacking in verisimilitude as to make its validity (or lack thereof) a moot point.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[DGM]

Many amazing instruments and gadgets are controlled by a computer.

I think my cartoon has validity because it explains what I think people physically did on 9/11. They went inside a room and controlled the machinery. They didn't go to an airport, pass box-cutters through security, and the rest.

Not that this matters to you Dr Tracy Blevins/Posert but, Nothing about the "box cutters" were illegal at that time. Unlike you, the hijackers did their homework and would know this.

 

[BaaBaa]

Are you thinking clearly on this subject? Two simulated planes. Zero real planes. Get it right.

Doctor Blevins, your hypothesis is ludicrous.

 

[NoahFence]

Not that this matters to you Dr Tracy Blevins/Posert but, Nothing about the "box cutters" were illegal at that time. Unlike you, the hijackers did their homework and would know this.

No kidding...

on 9/11 I could have walked up to security, pulled a box cutter out of my bag, shown it to the security, put it back in my bag and they'd have told me to have a nice flight.

 

[Bell]

If they don't find the naked pictures and pot protests first, then maybe you'll be right.

There are naked pictures of you?

Jesus!

 

[R.A.F.]

There are naked pictures of you?

Jesus!

Yeah...dusty's a real "winner".

 

[Oz1976]

Maybe the technicians didn't realize that it was more than a simulation.

Then why haven't they come forward?

 

[Bell]

Then why haven't they come forward?

They were "silenced"

Didn't you read Dusty's comic story?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

The title of this thread is "How It Was Done, 9/11" and not "How the Technology Was Developed, 1900s".

Developing technology isn't the same thing as using a weapon illegally. Whoever developed the technology, it was used on 9/11 to damage buildings.

Sitting at a keyboard or controller is all that's required. You don't have to get up early and go to the airport, if you catch my drift.

How-It-Was-Done, 9/11 refers to the physical acts required to carry out the deed on the day of the attacks.

Yeah. So your entire "explanation" consists of saying they pressed a button. Perhaps you have some inkling of just how hilariously pathetic that is.

 

[alienentity]

No, clearly all of you are wrong about 'How it was done'. The advanced holographic/dustifying/foamifiying technologies do not exist in present-day human endeavors.

But since Dr Blevins has proved that the towers were turned to dust or foam (which is it?) by declaring it to be so, she has also exposed another deeper 'truth' in the attacks: they were actually planned and performed by aliens from outer space. It doesn't matter where they came from, how many of them there were and are, or whether their technologies may have violated our puny laws of physics. These are all silly ideas and questions which are irrelevant to the central truth: aliens from outer space did 9/11.

In this example, a space alien moves its arm slightly, activating the mindlinked machines and weapons. This is the truth, all other explanations are fraudulent, especially science-based and evidentiary-based.

 

[alienentity]

Yeah. So your entire "explanation" consists of saying they pressed a button. Perhaps you have some inkling of just how hilariously pathetic that is.

The idea of pressing a button is laughable, I agree. No buttons were pressed. It was mindlink space alien technology. No question. That's how it happened.

 

[The Dark Lord]

LOL.

Step one: press a button.
Step two: some magic happens turning the WTC to foam.

Real convincing. I am sure the story will break any day now and Dusty will be regarded world wide as a hero. Or not.