Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[beachnut]

Supposedly it has been shown in one of the photographs posted. I don't see it in any of them, so I need it pointed out to me directly.

You don't answer questions or supply data. You find it yourself, are you a PhD or what? Why are you unable to find information? How will you run your company, tell your clients to look it up for themselves when they ask you to explain? Good one

 

[R.A.F.]

I looked at every 9:03AM image posted, and didn't see clear evidence of a wake in any of them.

Were you high at the time?

Sorry to keep coming back to this, but you are becoming INFAMOUS for your "promotion" of pot, so it can be easily assumed that at any time you might be high.

Personally, I would prefer to discuss topics, soberly.

 

[SanityGap]

I'm not talking about traditionally understood energy, the energy that comes from breaking chemical bonds. I'm talking about the energy of the interaction of molecules in a solid.

Solids are solid for a reason, and that reason is that the molecules of a solid have an affinity for one another. They reside so closely next to each other in a solid because of this reason, and most very dense solid objects are made of metallic elements.

What governs the interaction of molecules of metals in a solid? Why are metals so dense? The Casimir effect. Look it up. It's the force that makes metals denser than non-metals.

The Casimir effect is very sensitive to changes in the electromagnetic field. An attractive force at one of the "peaks" becomes a repellent force at a "trough". Remember how Dr. Wood has shown alterations in the electromagnetic field in the northern hemisphere? Remember how Dr. Wood is suggesting that a weapon that uses electromagnetic energy is the mechanism that destroyed the WTC (even calling it the Tesla-Hutchison effect)?

Also, the destruction must have taken place at normal temperatures, because the survivors of the dust cloud were not burned.

What we are left with here is an electromagnetic process that vibrated apart the molecules that made up the WTC. The WTC didn't collapse. It was turned into dust while standing, and the dust fell to the ground.

I found all these iron fragments in my dust samples, but I also found DNA in some of the dust samples. It all fits with a low heat vibrational destruction.

So, a Klingon Disruptor.

 

[calebprime]

They pressed a button.

In a sinister looking control room.

You know - like in the movies. It's all so simple when it's properly explained like that.

Yeah. All elegant, like.

 

[grandmastershek]

Easy to murder a few people, I think.

I think Dusty is telling us more about herself than anything else.

 

[Dave Rogers]

So, a Klingon Disruptor.

As I pointed out five years ago, it was no such thing; it was a Slaver Disintegrator, from Larry Niven's Known Space series. Not only does it have exactly the properties required for the WTC dust hypothesis, it was invented by a known associate of George Bush senior. And Tracey Postert is an even less interesting sci-fi-writer than Judy Wood.

Dave

 

[The Almond]

I'm not talking about traditionally understood energy, the energy that comes from breaking chemical bonds. I'm talking about the energy of the interaction of molecules in a solid.

Sigh. Do you need me to suggest a thermodynamics book, or can you type "thermodynamics" into the search field at amazon.com?

Solids are solid for a reason, and that reason is that the molecules of a solid have an affinity for one another.

False.

They reside so closely next to each other in a solid because of this reason, and most very dense solid objects are made of metallic elements.

Somewhere, right now, an astronomy professor is crying.

What governs the interaction of molecules of metals in a solid?

Quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and space unicorns.

Why are metals so dense?

My friend aluminum takes offense at your assertions. The density of metallic aluminum is 2.7 g/cm^3, and the density of the decidedly non metallic aluminum oxide is nearly 4 g/cm^3.

The Casimir effect. Look it up. It's the force that makes metals denser than non-metals.

Inaccurate and wildly irrelevant.

The Casimir effect is very sensitive to changes in the electromagnetic field. An attractive force at one of the "peaks" becomes a repellent force at a "trough". Remember how Dr. Wood has shown alterations in the electromagnetic field in the northern hemisphere? Remember how Dr. Wood is suggesting that a weapon that uses electromagnetic energy is the mechanism that destroyed the WTC (even calling it the Tesla-Hutchison effect)?

Irrelevant.

Also, the destruction must have taken place at normal temperatures, because the survivors of the dust cloud were not burned.

So what?

What we are left with here is an electromagnetic process that vibrated apart the molecules that made up the WTC. The WTC didn't collapse. It was turned into dust while standing, and the dust fell to the ground.

Increasing the velocity of the particles will increase their energy. See microwaves.

I found all these iron fragments in my dust samples, but I also found DNA in some of the dust samples. It all fits with a low heat vibrational destruction.

Actually, it fits better with unicorn destruction.

 

[NoahFence]

Ummm...Tracy...you didn't post anything.

???

I saw a complete and total listing of what's going on inside her head. Not sure what you saw.

 

[Resume]

I don't need an explanation. I need evidence in the form of an image.

Bricklike.

 

[nomuse]

That's the bad guy that killed the two good guys. Try to keep up.

So who shoots him?

 

[CORed]

Videos of 9:03AM do not depict an impact between any object and the south face of WTC 2. Things appear to explode out of the building, true, but that's not an impact!

Meaning that the plane didn't make a plane shaped hole in the building like Yosemite Sam makes a Yosemite Sam shaped whole in the wall when he runs through it.

Apparently the "doctor's" knowledge of physics come primarily from Warner Brothers cartoons.

 

[000063]

No planers think those were faked.

Ah. So They planted explosives to blow beams clear through the building and scatter the DNA evidence. Clearly, the passengers who were seen getting on the planes were highly-trained decoy actors, and the real people were killed, secretly transported to New York and planted in the Twin Towers.

Simple!

 

[WTC Dust]

You managed to miss the footage of the planes smashing into the buildings on TV?

I didn't miss them. I discussed them. I told you I consider them genuine video.

I do not think that anyone altered video to depict a plane. What I think is that all of the video and eyewitness testimony is genuine, but that what was seen was a fake plane.

Real video. Faked plane.

 

[WTC Dust]

They pressed a button.

In a sinister looking control room.

You know - like in the movies. It's all so simple when it's properly explained like that.

The title of this thread is "How It Was Done, 9/11" and not "How the Technology Was Developed, 1900s".

Developing technology isn't the same thing as using a weapon illegally. Whoever developed the technology, it was used on 9/11 to damage buildings.

Sitting at a keyboard or controller is all that's required. You don't have to get up early and go to the airport, if you catch my drift.

How-It-Was-Done, 9/11 refers to the physical acts required to carry out the deed on the day of the attacks.

 

[WTC Dust]

Are you aware that such evidence would also match your hypothesis?

It's basically the dragon in your garage.

How so?

 

[WTC Dust]

So there are aircraft in flight that don't produce a wake? How is that possible?

You always come out with these wacked out statement/questions that are inaccurate in weird ways. I don't know if it is your reading comprehension and writing ability, or deliberate obfuscation. I'm guessing the latter.

 

[WTC Dust]

Were you high at the time?

Sorry to keep coming back to this, but you are becoming INFAMOUS for your "promotion" of pot, so it can be easily assumed that at any time you might be high.

Personally, I would prefer to discuss topics, soberly.

I want to see this photograph. Do you know which one they're talking about, because I don't.

 

[000063]

The only thing that has been established so far is; you have no idea what a wake is. How can you ask for evidence of something that you clearly do not understand?

Very easily, it seems.

You always come out with these wacked out statement/questions that are inaccurate in weird ways. I don't know if it is your reading comprehension and writing ability, or deliberate obfuscation. I'm guessing the latter.

Would you care to specify some of the ways in which it is inaccurate?

 

[Craig4]

You always come out with these wacked out statement/questions that are inaccurate in weird ways. I don't know if it is your reading comprehension and writing ability, or deliberate obfuscation. I'm guessing the latter.

There's a third possibility you should consider.

 

[Myriad]

Interesting display of cargo cult thinking here. Somebody (in a room) operated a computer keyboard; that's how it works; that's how it was done.

It reminds me of the kid in Max Max: Beyond Thunderdome who keeps trying to send radio messages by playing with the knobs and switches on a disconnected control panel. Because that's how it works; that's how it's done.

That kid character has an excuse; he's just a kid and he lives in a world where real knowledge of how radio works is unavailable to him. Even though it's fiction, his beliefs and actions are plausible in context.

No-planers', not so much.

Respectfully,
Myriad