portlandatheist
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 3,725
I think no matter how you feel about whaling in general, I think its fair to say that Japanese whaling has as much to do with research as the Sea Shepard does with whale conservation.
The guise of "research" has a lot to do with it, yes. If the Japanese could somehow convince me that their whaling is in any way akin to what the Inuit do, I may even change my mind.
But seeing as though they enjoy slaughtering (See Taiji) I'm not gonna hold my breath. They are contemptable.
HA HA HA HA!!!!!!
He's taking our money and fueling a pleasure cruise with our money....
IN THE ANTARCTIC
Okee doke. Hellova spot. Me? I'd have chosen Bermuda but I'm goofy like that.
If you all had tasted whale meat, you would all cheer the whalers on.
Mmm, whale meat.
I disagree. I think that Muk Tuk is disgusting and the meat itself is OK but nothing to write home about. Its tender for sure but very marbled with fat as well. Of course, the meat I had was only boiled in water without any flavoring or spices at all so I don't know what it would be like if properly prepared. The Inuit insisted that the photos were not free and that I had to participate in the work, the food, and the festivities. Cultural immersion I suppose.
In point of fact Antarctica is visited by hundreds of tourists every year on cruise ships and private yachts. And that's not counting the however many visitors like this tool who declare that they will not be following any country's laws about visiting Antarctica (but still expect Southern Ocean nations to respond when they need assistance) and never check in with anyone.
who were you speaking to ?
Macgyver1968 clearly was only angry at Randfan
![]()
I saw him reacting to a personal insult the way most people do: personal insults make people angry.
Sure, Randfan apologized but you then very quickly took the opportunity to make fun of him in a pretty dirty fashion - advancing the fallacy that getting angry at a personal insult is the same thing as a bankrupt emotional argument. He got angry and left at that dirty tactic of yours, which was on top of a previously dirty tactic by someone else. And you followed with another one too. Human nature dictates that once anger is provoked, the apology does not instantly vacate that anger so it is an especially vulnerable time for the person provoked.
But I do withdraw any statement about Watson being your terrorist hero. I actually did think a previous comment with an ad hom in it was yours, and it wasn't. You were just having a lot of fun making him angry, basically accusing him of being a hypocrite which was not true and a cheap shot. So I apologize for that confusion but it remains true you took a cheap shot at a guy who was already provoked, and you thought that was funny.
show me yours !I admire people that have integrity.
This wasn't a contestSee how I "won?" .
that was Randfan, your post was all over the shop wasn't itI got him angry.
Boiled? Sounds horrible.. Treat it like a steak and it turns out delicious.
Whale meat isn't every day food in Norway. I eat it less than once a year, and mostly only when grandma makes it. But it sure is a treat. I see the word 'heritage' thrown around, and I'm sure that's part of why the Inuits and Faroese do it. But when it comes to Japan, I suspect they do it for the same reason we Norwegians do it: We see it as a great tasting meat and a real treat.
Suppose that we aren't talking about fully self-aware humans, but humans who are at a similar level of awareness as seals and whales, like infants or children?
I have no idea what you just said...what the **** does AIDS and the middle east have anything do with the justification of killing whales?
Your position is confusing to me in that I really don't see much of a distinction between what the Inuit do and the Japanese.
I understand that some think whaling is always bad, a view I've held the majority of my life, but these two cultures are both trying to hold on to something they see as their respective heritage, perhaps a bad culture practice and I understand that argument but cultural nonetheless and they use similar excuses, I really don't see much difference.
I don't see the distinction either.
1.) Not all animals experience pain the same (that's a scientific fact). 2.) Not all animals are self aware. So, IMO, there is a substantive difference based on empirical evidence. Repeating the same argument over and over isn't advancing the discussion.
Are you being obtuse? You are arguing by assertion and that's a fallacy. You are not making an argument based on empirical facts. I am.
Ad hominem deleted. Sorry.
I'm still lost. Are you seriously implying that support for the IRA is either a policy of the US government, or an important part of America's national identity (or both)?
Do you truly feel this is the kind of cause that's worth killing people for?