Do you know that there aren't any Nazi war criminals who admitted to gassing 1.1 million Jews at Auschwitz?
Hilariously wrong. Hoess admitted almost precisely that in his memoirs. His estimates of the major deportation actions to Auschwitz come to almost exactly 1.1 million, and as camp commandant then as staff officer in Amtsgruppe D in charge of the camps, he was in the best position to know.
No Nazi war criminal was ever charged with gassing 1.1 million Jews at Auschwitz.
Indeed, plenty of Nazi war criminals were charged with participating in the gassings of smaller numbers, since no one person had total responsibility for the overall death toll. Not even Hoess, since he was't camp commandant from November 1943 to May 1944 and left again in the summer of 1944. So that's a strawman.
Nobody has ever been convicted in a court of law or punished in any way for gassing 1.1 million Jews at Auschwitz.
Yet dozens of SS men were convicted of participating in gassings of smaller numbers, the ones for which they actually have criminal responsibility. Kremer was only at Auschwitz for a matter of months, how could he be charged with 1.1 million murders? Liebehenschel was only in charge for six months. Grabner was arrested at the end of 1943. Et cetera.
Am I a holocaust denier for saying this?
No, you're just clueless.
On the other hand, there is compelling evidence that 4.5 million Poles, Russians, Czechs, French, Belgians, Dutch, American, and other nationalities (but not Jews) were gassed at Auschwitz.
Funny, I don't see the words 'compelling evidence' used in the relevant section of the
UNWCC Law Reports summary of the Tesch case, which sums up the prosecution argument that an estimated six million were killed using Zyklon B in camps, referring to 4.5 million at Auschwitz. The evidence section then cites Pery Broad, who actually estimated 2.5 million victims at the trial, and contrary to your gloss, emphasised that those victims were Jews (as quoted in your source a few pages later). The indictment evidently did not specify a number, judging by the summary. As the Royal Warrant courts did not issue written judgements, there is no indication that any figure was carved in stone by the court at all. The evidence it heard would have contradicted the prosecution estimate since Broad gave a figure two million lower.
There are people who were arrested and prosecuted for supplying the Zyklon B that was used for committing this crime. None of the defendants charged with this crime denied that it occurred. Two men were convicted and executed specifically for supplying the murder weapon that was used for committing this crime. .
If I said that 4.5 million Poles, Russians, Czechs, French, Belgians, Dutch, American, and other nationalities (but not Jews) were not gassed at Auschwitz, would I be a holocaust denier?
If I said that Stalin didn't kill 100 million people as claimed by Solzhenitsyn on several occasions, am I minimising Stalin's crimes? Inaccurate or exaggerated estimates are hardly unusual for 20th Century megacides, some come from otherwise trustworthy sources. Solzhenitsyn may have been wrong about 100 million dead in the GULag, but that doesn't impeach all the evidence in the Gulag Archipelago. We have better evidence today regarding how many people Stalin ordered killed and caused to die in the GULag, and we have better evidence today regarding the precise extent of Nazi crimes at different sites.
If I said that Nazi Germany intended the physically exterminate all the Jews in Europe but that nobody was killed in a gas chamber, am I denying the holocaust?
But you don't say that, since you have repeatedly denied any such Nazi intention. Name me one person on the planet who denies gas chambers were used by the Nazis who accepts there was a Nazi intention to physically exterminate Jews. (I am ignoring your 'all Jews' strawman until you reply to a previous post.)
If I said that Nazi Germany murdered six million Jews but the five million non-Jews that some people say were murdered in the holocaust is a fantasy, would I be a holocaust denier?
Since many more than 5 million non-Jews were murdered by the Nazis, yes. But if you're correcting a populist meme spread around by Simon Wiesenthal and offering something
more sensible then no. Alas, you're not offering anything more sensible, you're just being a contrarian troll.
Is the evidence of gas chambers the same evidence that proves the Nazi plan to kill every Jew in Europe?
Common sense says no. Evidence of planning is not going to be identical to evidence of implementation, especially not when the Nazis used other means (like rifles and machine guns) to exterminate Jews alongside using gas chambers and gas vans.
I'm sure everyone long ago spotted the trend for Dogzilla to offer up strawmen and dance around the subject. I'm sure any noobs will spot this quick enough since three posts in a row from you is normally enough to convince anyone reading that you're simply trolling.
