Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[Oz1976]

I'm not inventing these weather reports. I'm just pointing to them.

Then you should have no problem reproducing these weather reports for our perusal...that is how this works...claim > evidence supporting > rebuttal. You continue to provide zero evidence and plainly, in my opinion, are flat out lying.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Either read the book or check out her website.

Sorry, I didn't realise that particular material was on her website. I looked at some stuff on her website a year or so ago: photos of wrecked cars with her "interpretations". I quickly concluded she wasn't quite right in the head.

 

[The Dark Lord]

Judy Wood supposedly spent several years in a coma. So she may have brain damage. What is your excuse, Dusty?

 

[plague311]

Judy Wood supposedly spent several years in a coma. So she may have brain damage. What is your excuse, Dusty?

Brain Damage.

 

[beachnut]

My goodness. Either read the book or check out her website. The data is there. So many of you claim expertise on Judy Wood, and yet none of you except Jammonius act like you even know what her work is!

Her work is delusional nonsense, you and Jammonius are the only people who can't figure it out.

I checked out her web site, it is filled with delusion, insane claims, lies and more. You failed to verify before you supported Judy. Your failure is due to lack of research and rational analysis.

 

[phiwum]

Sure, as soon as you drop the Scientist stuff and trafficking your Phd as a credibility boost.

With due respect, the fact that she pretends to have authority is irrelevant to whether we ought to mock her employment status. As much as I'm curious about how she did on Wall St., it really is a topic that ought to be out-of-bounds here.

 

[phunk]

Let's have a look..shall we?

Dr. Judy got her data from This Website

She only shows us the frame for 9/11...but lets look at a few other day's readings:

Sept 8:
[qimg]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46946106/2001FtYukonSept8.gif[/qimg]

Sept 9:
[qimg]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46946106/2001FtYukonSept9.gif[/qimg]

Sept 10:
[qimg]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46946106/2001FtYukonSept10.gif[/qimg]

Sept 11:
[qimg]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46946106/2001FtYukonSept11.gif[/qimg]

Sept 12:
[qimg]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46946106/2001FtYukonSept12.gif[/qimg]

Sept 13:
[qimg]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46946106/2001FtYukonSept13.gif[/qimg]

They must of been firing a really big DEW on the 12th and 13th!

Yep, those are caused by space weather, not earth weather. Nothing to do with the hurricane.

 

[Dog Town]

With due respect, the fact that she pretends to have authority is irrelevant to whether we ought to mock her employment status. As much as I'm curious about how she did on Wall St., it really is a topic that ought to be out-of-bounds here.

Why? All part of the package!

 

[phiwum]

Why? All part of the package!

Because it's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. We aren't here to discuss Dusty's professional failings --- especially not in a profession that is unrelated to any relevant topic here.

Look, her argument stands or falls on its own, right? Mocking her as a person and especially bringing in personal details about her career is just bad taste.

 

[beachnut]

With due respect, the fact that she pretends to have authority is irrelevant to whether we ought to mock her employment status. As much as I'm curious about how she did on Wall St., it really is a topic that ought to be out-of-bounds here.

You are right.

Her research skills and critical thinking brings the world steel turning to dust and foam; what more could 911 truth need.

 

[TSR]

\Because it's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. We aren't here to discuss Dusty's professional failings --- especially not in a profession that is unrelated to any relevant topic here.

She made it the topic, the very first time she told someone to shut up because she was a scientist and thereby worth of respect. If she hadn't started insisting that she be called "Dr." for a degree in a field completely unrelated to the topic at hand, you might have a point.

And should she now stop, then continuing to note that she has never been able to keep a paying gig for even so much as a school term since that degree was awarded still speaks entirely to the credibility she leans on so heavily to give her daft ideas the weight they cannot muster on their own.

The reason she is currently running from my question about the elapsed decade between her foam being deposited and her having found it is because the answer also destroys that credibility. The reason she finally came up with the "UV method" of determining the presence of DNA (something she has never claimed before) is because she is hoping beyond hope that no one else knows that that technique involves access to a moderately expensive piece of equipment she has no access to.

As so many of her failed ideas, it is only worth to her the attention she can garner from it, apparently and IMO -- and it's just to bad that that attention is not all in the form of adulation.

 

[Macgyver1968]

Brain Damage.

Dude...you can make fun of Dr. Judy because she's not a member. But Dusty is a member...It's against the rules to question her sanity...no matter how crazy her theories sound.

 

[phiwum]

She made it the topic, the very first time she told someone to shut up because she was a scientist and thereby worth of respect. If she hadn't started insisting that she be called "Dr." for a degree in a field completely unrelated to the topic at hand, you might have a point.

Her own arrogance and pretence is utterly beside the point. You shouldn't mock her (presumably short-lived) career in finance because that's simply beyond the pale.

But I've had my say. If the moderators think that repeated questions about the status of her Wall St. employment are acceptable in this thread, then so be it.

 

[dropzone]

Dude...you can make fun of Dr. Judy because she's not a member. But Dusty is a member...It's against the rules to question her sanity...no matter how crazy her theories sound.

Yep. Found that out my own self.

Edited to remove something I probably shouldn't have said.

 

[Macgyver1968]

If the moderators think that repeated questions about the status of her Wall St. employment are acceptable in this thread, then so be it.

The simple fact, some JREF'ers want to hear that Dusty was fired from her job with the "Wall Street" company due to her "Controversial Views" It's all Schadenfreude...you can't blame them.

 

[The Big Dog]

With due respect, the fact that she pretends to have authority is irrelevant to whether we ought to mock her employment status. As much as I'm curious about how she did on Wall St., it really is a topic that ought to be out-of-bounds here.

While I would normally agree, I have to point out that she performed a very public job search for it, she publicly advertised her status as a PhD to obtain it, she sat for media interviews and photographs regarding her success in obtaining a job as the result of it and she mentioned it right here in this thread.

She intentionally became a public figure regarding her inability to obtain employment despite having a PhD, yet has relied on her alleged credentials in order to bolster her credibility.

Seems like fair game to me. Perhaps next time she will decline the media attention. Perhaps she will abandon her claims that she has a PhD and thus that provides gravitas to her opinions.

Until then, I believe that people reading this thread deserve the full story.

That being said, I do strongly believe her consumption of marijuana should be out of bounds. I hereby state that her consumption of pot, notwithstanding how large or how little it is not relevant.

I urge all of you to agree that WTCDust's advocacy of marijuana and questions regarding her use of same are not appropriate.

I submit that every post in this thread from here on in should contain the following disclaimer:

I don't care about WTCDust's decade long advocacy of marijuana nor her use or lack thereof of marijuana.

Fair is fair.

 

[phiwum]

The simple fact, some JREF'ers want to hear that Dusty was fired from her job with the "Wall Street" company due to her "Controversial Views" It's all Schadenfreude...you can't blame them.

I'm curious about what happened as well. I don't blame them for wanting to know about it --- just for pushing for personal details on a public forum where it doesn't belong.

 

[Macgyver1968]

Yep, those are caused by space weather, not earth weather. Nothing to do with the hurricane.

Yes...the fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field is directly proportional to the amount solar wind expelled from the sun. The amount of energy from these solar wind bursts compared to a DEW Weapon is like comparing a trickle of water to the entire tidal forces of the earth. Several orders of magnitude difference.

 

[Macgyver1968]

I'm curious about what happened as well. I don't blame them for wanting to know about it --- just for pushing for personal details on a public forum where it doesn't belong.

Dude..I'm curious too. Just from her reactions...she doesn't work there anymore. But that's her prerogative to divulge.

 

[Huttosaurus]

Hey, man. If you would have produced evidence of a wake, I'd have taken back my statements and apologized for being wrong. I didn't ask for a justification as to why there wasn't a wake. I asked for evidence of a wake, and you couldn't provide it. You have failed to provide evidence of a wake at 9:03AM, and I wasn't asking for excuses. Just evidence.

You're asking for evidence though is meaningless, since in this context absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. It proves nothing. Claiming that not seeing something you should not expect to see proves anything is just cherry-picking data to prop up a pre-determined conclusion.