Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[WTC Dust]

Are you saying the dust cloud was there BEFORE the impact and the plane flew through it?

How could the plane have flown through the dust cloud when the dust cloud was created after the plane impacted the tower?

You need to read more carefully. You wouldn't be so confused. WTC was already emitting stuff at 9:03AM. No evidence of a wake was seen in the cloud of material being emitted from WTC 1. Really good evidence that there wasn't a plane flying nearby.

 

[carlitos]

The simple fact is Dr. Judy posts random images that only have significance to her..No one else knows what the **** she is talking about. Somehow her followers see relevance to these and assign great meaning to these findings.

It amazes me how devoted her follower are. Take amandareckonwith on DIF...he acts like he get commission from Dr. Judy's book.

Speaking of commissions and her "book," I wonder if she got releases and permission to use all of those photos in her book. Showing them on your website with a link is one thing, printing them in your $50 book and selling them is a completely different use, in terms of copyright.

Jamm, are you and Judy Wood one in the same?

jammonius, I believe, is attorney Jerry Leaphart. Here is a PDF Link to example of his fine work. I don't think he's ever confirmed / denied his identity here though. Could be wrong.

 

[phunk]

You are stating that some air follows an airplane.

"Follows" implies that the air is behind the plane moving in the same direction. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the boundary layer that's not much thicker than the paint on the plane, has nothing to do with the wake, and stops when the plane does.

 

[phunk]

You need to read more carefully. You wouldn't be so confused. WTC was already emitting stuff at 9:03AM. No evidence of a wake was seen in the cloud of material being emitted from WTC 1. Really good evidence that there wasn't a plane flying nearby.

That cloud was hundreds of feet above and to the west of the plane. The wake of a plane doesn't go up, it goes down.

 

[carlitos]

Much as mentioning Judy Wood's name has a beetlejuice-like effect in making jammonius appear, please do take care not to show examples of the height of the debris pile.

You don't really want to go there.

 

[DGM]

I'm not agreeing to that.

Are you one of the six who will admit that you can't provide evidence of a wake at 9:03AM? I'd like to close this thread satisfactorily.

Do you consider the fact the "wake" was possibly not visible?

I have seen images (shown) that show what most likely is the planes wake but, I can not show what you expect to see.

Can we close this thread as another failed attempt to prove "no-planes"?

 

[beachnut]

You need to read more carefully. You wouldn't be so confused. WTC was already emitting stuff at 9:03AM. No evidence of a wake was seen in the cloud of material being emitted from WTC 1. Really good evidence that there wasn't a plane flying nearby.

The aircraft, flight 175 was not nearby, it hit the WTC tower. This is a fact, not something you can debate.

You can debate how fast, which is provided by video evidence, and RADAR evidence. Not much more to debate.

RADAR proves 175 impacted the tower, and it is backed up with video and thousands of witnesses.

There would be no visible wake turbulence seen since the smoke was going up, and not down where the wake goes. You failed this time because you can't form a rational claim about wake.

Not seeing wake means you don't know physics, and that is backed up with your failure to understand momentum and gravity.

 

[WTC Dust]

Do you consider the fact the "wake" was possibly not visible?

I have seen images (shown) that show what most likely is the planes wake but, I can not show what you expect to see.

Can we close this thread as another failed attempt to prove "no-planes"?

Can you show the pictures and describe where you see evidence of a wake at 9:03AM? I want to know which pictures and what hallmarks of a wake are visible. Thanks ahead of time.

 

[DGM]

Can you show the pictures and describe where you see evidence of a wake at 9:03AM? I want to know which pictures and what hallmarks of a wake are visible. Thanks ahead of time.

R Mackey already did.

How about what I said in the rest of my post?

 

[X]

Goldfish have a 5 second memory...


Dusty, you ask a question, and when someone answers, you seem to "forget" the question you posed. And any previous replies pertaining to it.


Let's recap.
1) You say there were reports of thunder at 3 airports.
2) There were no thunderclouds in the area.
3) There were fighters traveling at supersonic speeds.
4) Supersonic aircraft produce sonic booms.
5) Sonic booms can sound like thunder.
6) Thunder reports from airports come from automated stations, which do not distinguish between thunder and sonic booms.
7) Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that given points 2, 3 and 6, the reports of "thunder" were actually reports of sonic booms.


Goldfish have a 5 second memory. How did you fair?

 

[000063]

Do you count yourself as one of the "six regular posters who aren't on my ignore list" who admits that they cannot provide clear evidence of a wake at 9:03AM at Ground Zero on 9/11? Just say, "Yes, I admit that I cannot provide clear evidence of a wake." and I will count you in towards the goal of closing this thread.

If only six people here aren't on your ignore, then why are you still here? That's like a Neo-Nazi skinhead with swatstika tats visiting a synagogue and being surprised when people glare at him.

 

[Gamolon]

Can you show the pictures and describe where you see evidence of a wake at 9:03AM? I want to know which pictures and what hallmarks of a wake are visible. Thanks ahead of time.

Can you please show me, in the photo below, what particles, smoke, dust, etc. are present in the plane's path that would allow a vortex, generated by said plane, to be visible?

 

[TSR]

Are you saying there is no forward movement of water as a boat moves through the water?

No, SUSPilot mentions nothing at all about boats, because any such mention is completely irrelevant to the topic of a "wake" being "pulled along" by an airplane.

Try reading for comprehension next time, m'kay?

 

[beachnut]

To be specific, I said reports of thunder, not thunderstorms, at all three NYC airports on 9/11.

Oh, Judy says rain too, rain in clear skies; beam weapon, etc... Thunder in clear skies with rain. You support a liar; Why?

You have dust and foam, both fantasies, and Judy makes up the weather to go with her insane claims. Bad research, or liar; which applies to Judy?

Did you try to look up the weather on 911 besides the fact we all know it was a clear day, no major wind, no weather; the terrorists pilots could not hit the towers in the weather, why do you think they picked VFR weather? Because they don't live in a fantasy world like Judy, or the dust/foam world you have made up.

 

[TSR]

Hell it got you a job with John Thomas Financial Brokerage.

How's that going?

Off topic.

And irrelevant, since it no longer exists...

 

[Sam.I.Am]

I'm still trying to figure out why (according to WTC Dust) there was only thunder "Reported" at three airports while in the rest of the area consisting of at least one hundred square miles there were no reports of thunder at all but in fact the exact opposite. What is it about Judy Woods magical space beams that targets lightning only at airports but nowhere else?

 

[WTC Dust]

I get it. I just say "meh". Reports of thunder are reports of thunder.

Goldfish have a 5 second memory...


Dusty, you ask a question, and when someone answers, you seem to "forget" the question you posed. And any previous replies pertaining to it.


Let's recap.
1) You say there were reports of thunder at 3 airports.
2) There were no thunderclouds in the area.
3) There were fighters traveling at supersonic speeds.
4) Supersonic aircraft produce sonic booms.
5) Sonic booms can sound like thunder.
6) Thunder reports from airports come from automated stations, which do not distinguish between thunder and sonic booms.
7) Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that given points 2, 3 and 6, the reports of "thunder" were actually reports of sonic booms.


Goldfish have a 5 second memory. How did you fair?

 

[dropzone]

my postdoctoral training was in the department of bioengineering

Mods, I request permission to snicker aloud.

 

[WTC Dust]

I'm still trying to figure out why (according to WTC Dust) there was only thunder "Reported" at three airports while in the rest of the area consisting of at least one hundred square miles there were no reports of thunder at all but in fact the exact opposite. What is it about Judy Woods magical space beams that targets lightning only at airports but nowhere else?

I'm not inventing these weather reports. I'm just pointing to them.

 

[WTC Dust]

And irrelevant, since it no longer exists...

Please stop talking about any of my former or current places of employment.