CompusMentus
Waiting for the Worms
VERY LIKELY
Think about what those words mean, and get back to me. But you probably won't.
Compus
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread
- Thread starter WTC Dust
- Start date
VERY LIKELY
Think about what those words mean, and get back to me. But you probably won't.
Compus
Sunstealer
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,128
It's classic dusty, her NPD takes over so she has to have her words first because she sees herself as more important than everyone else. In effect she's putting herself above (literally) the person she is responding to.
phunk
Illuminator
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Messages
- 4,127
The author's preface has transcripts of her classes?
ETA: adding previous quotes for clarity.
Last edited:
CompusMentus
Waiting for the Worms
Why do the those that defend Judy Wood here get so het up about the evidence that she has often insisted that the DEW was situated in space?
Why is there such denial that she said those words even when there is irrefutable evidence that she did?
Perhaps the unrelenting, pitiless scorn and ridicule she was/is subjected to because of it (her space beam theory) has something to do with that denial.
Why is it all so shameful?
Compus
Why is there such denial that she said those words even when there is irrefutable evidence that she did?
Perhaps the unrelenting, pitiless scorn and ridicule she was/is subjected to because of it (her space beam theory) has something to do with that denial.
Why is it all so shameful?
Compus
Last edited:
CompusMentus
Waiting for the Worms
tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
Any idea as to when we'll see this world shifting information?
Yes, I'd like to get in on the IPO.
Stellafane
Village Idiot.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
- Messages
- 8,368
I'm not sure it's "shameful" exactly; it's that if you place the DEW in space then it becomes observable (quite easily so in fact), and thus you have to explain why no one has seen it. Since there's no good answer for that one (even by the modest standards set by Truthers), it's better if you just pretend it never happened.
Scott Sommers
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,866
I'm getting tired of all you JREF cronies telling these no-plane Truther heroes to do their research properly and then turning around with such sloppy work. Everyone knows there are hand held DEW weapons.
I looked all over the place and was able to find this video of one of the weapons on Youtube. You can see it around the 0:30 second mark. Too bad they don't use it, but once you see it, you'll know how silly you've been acting.
9/11 Truth...9/11 Truth...making heroes out of losers since high school graduation.
Last edited:
Debunkers owned
This is a post that undermines the integrity of 9/11 DEBUNKING to a faretheewell:
It is found a few pages back and has generated no comment, other than my having posted that it is an admission of fascism and of the utter futility of the concept of 9/11 debunking.
It is more than that, really, it is proof that debunking is based on disengenuity.
At the very least, debunkers, if there are those of you who wish to explain (away), distance, qualify, endorse, or otherwise cop some sort of plea concerning the undermining of debunking that has been admitted, please do so now, even though, in reality, it is already too little too late.
For those who might like to plead ignorance, the post merely confirms the unwritten rule that thou shalt not question the common storyline of 9/11 out of fear or reprisal. The US military is up front about it; military personnel CANNOT question 9/11. The same is true, less openly stated, in corporate America, including corporate Media, Big Academia, government at all levels and in the the work place here, there and everywhere.
People are mandated, by fascism, to shut up, go along and be "good Americans" lest they be fired from their jobs that they are already afraid of losing in the depression we are in, anyway. In fact, it is a wonder there is as much professional analysis confirming the common storyline of 9/11 is false, as there is, in the police state condition we have allowed ourselves to live in.
Take your time. I've got other fish to fry for a few days. I'll check again in a week.
Meanwhile,
Blessings
This is a post that undermines the integrity of 9/11 DEBUNKING to a faretheewell:
It is found a few pages back and has generated no comment, other than my having posted that it is an admission of fascism and of the utter futility of the concept of 9/11 debunking.
It is more than that, really, it is proof that debunking is based on disengenuity.
At the very least, debunkers, if there are those of you who wish to explain (away), distance, qualify, endorse, or otherwise cop some sort of plea concerning the undermining of debunking that has been admitted, please do so now, even though, in reality, it is already too little too late.
For those who might like to plead ignorance, the post merely confirms the unwritten rule that thou shalt not question the common storyline of 9/11 out of fear or reprisal. The US military is up front about it; military personnel CANNOT question 9/11. The same is true, less openly stated, in corporate America, including corporate Media, Big Academia, government at all levels and in the the work place here, there and everywhere.
People are mandated, by fascism, to shut up, go along and be "good Americans" lest they be fired from their jobs that they are already afraid of losing in the depression we are in, anyway. In fact, it is a wonder there is as much professional analysis confirming the common storyline of 9/11 is false, as there is, in the police state condition we have allowed ourselves to live in.
Take your time. I've got other fish to fry for a few days. I'll check again in a week.
Meanwhile,
Blessings
Last edited:
aggle-rithm
Ardent Formulist
FAKE! Note how the crew woman looks EXACTLY like Dr. Pulaski?!?
plague311
Great minds think...
This is a post that undermines the integrity of 9/11 DEBUNKING to a faretheewell:
[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/post475.jpg[/qimg]
It is found a few pages back and has generated no comment, other than my having posted that it is an admission of fascism and of the utter futility of the concept of 9/11 debunking.
It is more than that, really, it is proof that debunking is based on disengenuity.
At the very least, debunkers, if there are those of you who wish to explain (away), distance, qualify, endorse, or otherwise cop some sort of plea concerning the undermining of debunking that has been admitted, please do so now, even though, in reality, it is already too little too late.
Take your time. I've got other fish to fry for a few days. I'll check again in a week.
Meanwhile,
Blessings
Don't hurry, you can stay gone. I, personally, don't believe anyone values your opinion about much of anything.
MarkLindeman
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 493
Like many of your assertions in your thread, that one is bizarre and unsupported. Really, what else needs to be said?
If the facts don't support you, cite the law. If the law doesn't support you, pound the table. And if that doesn't work out, declare victory and leave.
WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
Are you talking about the thunder they heard at all 3 NYC airports on 9/11? Are you trying to deny the weather reports? I really don't get it.
Sonic booms. The skies were clear on 911. Simple research could stop your fantasy of steel turning to dust.
WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
Other people brought up Mackey's attempt at debunking Wood, not me. "Space beams" is still used by members of this forum to fake-describe Judy's work. I'm just pointing it out. It takes a lot more than an internet post to get me hot and bothered. The murder of thousands of New Yorkers and the sickening of thousands more is what bothers me.
My degree in biomedical science allows me the expertise to comment on the health effects of the rescue workers. They are suffering from the inhalation of excessive amounts of IRON, not asbestos. That these people are suffering more than they need to be (because of their politically motivated disease diagnosis) makes me mad.
My degree in biomedical science allows me the expertise to comment on the health effects of the rescue workers. They are suffering from the inhalation of excessive amounts of IRON, not asbestos. That these people are suffering more than they need to be (because of their politically motivated disease diagnosis) makes me mad.
WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
I do. He's rather clever, and he knows the work of Judy Wood better than I do, in some aspects.
phunk
Illuminator
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Messages
- 4,127
How do you not understand what I said? It was very simple, especially given the direct quotes I included. I did not deny any weather reports, although I was here on 9/11 and there were no thunderstorms, so I'm curious what reports you're referring to.
Again:
I'm trying to figure out why you think thunder is evidence of an electromagnetic field extending from the eye of hurricane erin to NYC.
WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
Sonic booms? Do the airports normally report sonic booms as thunder? Silly theory.
WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
Just as long as you're not specifically denying reports of thunder at all 3 NYC airports, and as long as you're not specifically denying that Hurricane Erin was off the coast of Long Island on 9/11, we're good on these points.