Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
Interesting article in The New Yorker:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...hops.html?mbid=gnep&google_editors_picks=true
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...hops.html?mbid=gnep&google_editors_picks=true
People have been condemning the religious for social activism for centuries, it's nothing new.I don't know--modern nuns are a bunch of commies.
Very interesting. It really points out the hypocrisy in the Vatican position. It's not the LCWR's doctrinal positions that are at issue or even their political activism but rather activism on the wrong (from the Vatican perspective) issues.Interesting article in The New Yorker:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...hops.html?mbid=gnep&google_editors_picks=true
The auto da fe?
Or just The Inquisition?
Scientific progress no. http://ncronline.org/node/11541 same as social progress no.The RCC has long been okay with scientific progress. But yes, social progress is different.
Social activism isn't uncommon among the female religious, e.g. Sr. Stan, along with charitable work. It seems the Vatican, or at least the former rotweiller of orthodoxy, feels their efforts should be better focussed on opposing access to legal abortion, opposing marriage equality et cetera.
The support of LCWR and Network for US health care reform was particularly annoying to the hierarchy.
However in conjunction with other actions, like the silencing of Tony Flannery (exiled to a monastery to contemplate his sins), this crackdown may prove counter-productive to the aim of maintaining Roman control.
Scientific progress no. http://ncronline.org/node/11541 same as social progress no.

The RCC has long been okay with scientific progress. But yes, social progress is different.
I heard an interview with the spokesperson for this group on BBC World yesterday. Honestly, I have never heard someone so humorless, dull, pompous, arrogant, self-important, self-reverential, self-centered and jingoistic in my entire life.
The reign of his holiness, Simon Bar Sinister, will end soon. Then we can go back to appreciating the good works of the Vatican Observatory and the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, which includes Stephen Hawking as a member.Scientific progress no. http://ncronline.org/node/11541 same as social progress no.
This is a positive development. When a pedophile-enabling, anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-independent thinking cult is plagued by infighting, this can only be a good thing for society.

Yes, and we can reflect on the fate of Father George Coyne. See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-401950/Pope-sacks-astronomer-evolution-debate.html .The reign of his holiness, Simon Bar Sinister, will end soon. Then we can go back to appreciating the good works of the Vatican Observatory and the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, which includes Stephen Hawking as a member.
And who fired him? Ratzi, about whom rumors regarding his endgame (death or abdication) have been swirling since before his elevation.Yes, and we can reflect on the fate of Father George Coyne. See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-401950/Pope-sacks-astronomer-evolution-debate.html .
There have only ever been two nuns? I would say a polygamist surpassing Solomon.Nuns are proof that Jesus is a bigamist.