• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The death throes of a conspiracy theory.

@SHC
Ridiculous!
You arrive at your belief purely on weak circumstantial evidence and utter personal speculation
You have exactly no evidence to support your postion and yet demand a much greater standard from those in oppostion to you
You have been shown all of the evidence that DOES exist and assert, without compelling reasoning that any evidence to back your position is just unavailable
Of course the most parsimonious reasoning for why you have no doc to back your position is that it does not and never did exist

Your arguement is toast
 
Last edited:
It is very much relevant, they weren't concentration camps. But the fact that the camps were wrong? I agree with that.

Of course they were concentration camps, just as the British termed them and used them during the Second Boer War 40 years earlier. The British built concentration camps to house Boer civilians in, primarily to keep them from aiding and supporting the Boer guerrillas. This was the same goal of Roosevelt when he built his concentration camps - to keep the Japanese-American U.S. citizens from aiding and supporting the Japanese Empire.

You just don't like the term 'concentration camp' because you've been programmed to associate it with only the Holocaust. Sorry, but that term was in use long before the Holocaust.

So somone gave the order that that all records of this be destroyed is given, which would require signatures of the person giving the order, someone would have to destribute these orders, requiring signatures that these orders were received and understood, then someone would have to carry out those orders, requiring signatures for arrests made for non-compliance, papers confisticated, warnings issued not to talk to anyone anywhere ever, and someone would have to receive, cataloge, and destroy all these documents requiring more signatures affirming all that. Is that about the size of it?

Maybe, you don't know. You're assuming our criminal government doesn't destroy evidence of their wrongdoing. I don't make that assumption.

Because it sounds ridiculous. Now I've noticed you introduced the existance of the Syphalis experiments and MKULTRA IV for support of your claims...

You do realise the only reason why we know of those programs and for the very same reasons that makes your claims sound stupid right? Someone within those programs broke silence and they produced evidence... from the Government!!!

So? That doesn't necessarily mean that someone always breaks silence. We should also point out from the MK-ULTRA case how a high-ranking government official attempted to destroy a whole lot of evidence of government wrongdoing and largely succeeded.

In 1973 CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKULTRA files destroyed. Pursuant to this order, most CIA documents regarding the project were destroyed, making a full investigation of MKULTRA impossible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA

Imagine the stuff we didn't ever learn or hear about due to the destruction of that evidence. Could a similar destruction of evidence have occurred after the Pearl Harbor attacks?

I see no reason to believe otherwise.

I reached a conclusion based upon available evidence. It is you who is speculating.

Correction:

You reached a conclusion based upon evidence the U.S. government wanted and allowed you to see. So, in reality, you really are speculating.

You have absolutely no way of knowing what Roosevelt and his henchmen really knew about the Pearl Harbor attack.
 
One (the only?) useful thing to come out of SHC's threads if final proof that the "It takes just as much faith to be an atheist" trope is just as stupid when applied to history as it is to religion.
 
Why do you assume that there is no continuity of and within our government? Because the presidential puppet changes every four to eight years?

Ah, yes, it is actually the evil Jew billionaire shadow government that is in charge. The evidence supporting this "theory" follows:
 
Last edited:
Why do you assume that there is no continuity of and within our government? Because the presidential puppet changes every four to eight years?

What sinister eminence grise do you claim has been keeping a lid on this conspiracy since 1941?

You still haven't told us whose permission the president needs to seek to be allowed to read Top Secret documents.
 
Obviously the lid covering the sooper seekrit evidence you imagine is being suppressed.

Who knows? You're only guessing that Pearl Harbor information isn't being suppressed.


But you haven't yet told us who forbids him to read whatever he damned well pleases.

But you haven't yet told us how you know presidents can read all the Top Secret classified information they want, or proven why they'd even have the desire to release it.
 
What's daft about it?

A trail of paper evidence can by destroyed by removing or sabotaging key pieces of the trail. A trail of evidence can even be redirected from one conclusion to another.

Unless "they are classified"? :jaw-dropp

Hypo: You are a teenager who thinks Alex Jones is a newsman.

Grow up and enjoy the company of Anders in my ignore list.
 
It is kind of telling that someone like SpringHallConvert is the top poster in this thread (reading the OP).

:p
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom