• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trayvon Martin, Vigilante Justice

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's what I want too, but the mob (Spike Lee, Al Sharpton, and the New Black Panthers....) is looking for an actual conviction as well. I'm not sure how they will react if that doesn't happen.

It's quite clear. Bloody riots. And the career race baiters as well as the media will have the blood on their hands.
 
She also claims the police did only a short interview initially and then ignored her. The police story is that she refused to be interviewed and only agreeded on the third request.

Thanks, had not seen that particular detail.

In my personal opinion, her credibility just keeps getting less and less.
 
Strawman, and a dumb one at that.

His point is, that the fight would have most likely NEVER occurred if Zimmerman had not left his vehicle to follow him.
I've seen way too much stupid in this thread to discount anything out of hand.
 
No, I'm under the impression that Zimmerman's actions weren't justified by what LTC seems to have implied was a reasonable need to observe a suspicious person.
DUH! Given that he had no probable cause even to maintain surveilance means that his actions weren't justified.

There is also the fact that everything he did was, from a tactical point of view, stupid.
 
Basically, Zimmerman says that as he was walking back to his SUV, Martin approached him and asked why he was following him.

So far, Zimmerman hasn't said much of anything particular, either on his own or through his lawyer. The Sanford police have leaked multiple accounts of Zimmerman giving an improbable story - so far, he was both attacked from behind and punched in the face.

Of course, their own police chief also said that Zimmerman's 911 tape showed that Zimmerman didn't't know Martin's race, even though on the actual tape, Zimmerman identifies Martin as black. At this point, pretty much everything they say isn't trustworthy, so I wouldn't put their words into Zimmerman's mouth.
 
Wouldn't be the first time Sharpton's mouth led to innocent people being killed.

You have no idea what's happening. If anything, Sharpton is calming things down by helping to focus people into peaceful protests and helping get mainstream media coverage.
 
Sanford police have leaked multiple accounts of Zimmerman giving an improbable story - so far, he was both attacked from behind and punched in the face.
No such thing was said.

Why can't you discuss this without lying?

The story is he was approached from behind, words were exchanged, and he was punched in the face.

Not that facts matter to the Martin Truthers.
 
You have no idea what's happening. If anything, Sharpton is calming things down by helping to focus people into peaceful protests and helping get mainstream media coverage.
Sure he is, just like Freddie's Fashion Mart.

Tawana Brawley and the Duke lacrosse fiasco, also shining moments in Sharpton's career.
 
No such thing was said.

Why can't you discuss this without lying?

The story is he was approached from behind, words were exchanged, and he was punched in the face.


The most often-repeated lies being told in this thread involve proclaiming that the evidence "supports Zimmerman's self-defense claim", when in fact it does no such thing. All it supports is that Zimmerman followed Martin, there was a fight, and Zimmerman killed Martin.
 
The most often-repeated lies being told in this thread involve proclaiming that the evidence "supports Zimmerman's self-defense claim", when in fact it does no such thing. All it supports is that Zimmerman followed Martin, there was a fight, and Zimmerman killed Martin.

And so the evidence does support his self defense claim. It doesn't completely support it, and the evidence also supports versions where self defense isn't a valid claim.

Evidence can support more than one hypothesis.
 
The most often-repeated lies being told in this thread involve proclaiming that the evidence "supports Zimmerman's self-defense claim", when in fact it does no such thing. All it supports is that Zimmerman followed Martin, there was a fight, and Zimmerman killed Martin.

Innocent until proven guilty ring a bell ?

NM - tyr_13 said it better with less snark
 
Last edited:
So far, Zimmerman hasn't said much of anything particular, either on his own or through his lawyer. The Sanford police have leaked multiple accounts of Zimmerman giving an improbable story - so far, he was both attacked from behind and punched in the face.

Of course, their own police chief also said that Zimmerman's 911 tape showed that Zimmerman didn't't know Martin's race, even though on the actual tape, Zimmerman identifies Martin as black. At this point, pretty much everything they say isn't trustworthy, so I wouldn't put their words into Zimmerman's mouth.


Got a link to that?
 
Obviously, or they wouldn't have recommended a felony charge, as has been stated numerous times.

They can recommend any charge they want, but if they don't do a complete enough investigation to back up those charges, the SAO cannot do a damn thing about it.

"Here, here's the charges we suggest."

"You don't have enough evidence, we can't do anything"

"But we suggested a charge...."

"Correct, but your charge isn't supported......get more evidence...."

"Um......about that....."

Yeah, it's that simple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom