Please tell me what you are saying I said in my post.
Not to mention his remarks present a commensurate overrating of US intelligence abilities, to almost mythical proportions. Too much watching The Bourne Identity and too little actual research.Why do people continue to perpetuate the myth that Osama and his associates were "cavemen", implying of course that they were uneducated buffoons? These were (are) well-educated men and far from being cavemen. The master planners were actually Yousef, Murad and KSM. Yousef was educated in the UK and quite brilliant. Murad studied at flight schools in the US and was a pilot. KSM also studied in the US. Osama (the financier) was also a college-educated man who left college to engage the Soviets in Afghanistan. His #2, Zawahiri is a medical doctor. And, the operational commander Atta had just earned a Masters degree!
So hardly cavemen. They were very bright men who had studied not only the US, but also our intelligence assets since the Soviet-Afghan conflict. They studied commercial aviation and knew exactly how to penetrate it. Your remarks demonstrate your ignorance of the topic at hand.
Fenton give pieces of the puzzle. There are broader issues with multi nation intelligence agencies that go beyond just Alec Station to others such as: ISI (Pakistan) and GID (Saudi)...
Bandar Bush stated they were tracking the hijackers "with precision". He wass referring to the GID which was headed at the time by Prince Turki. Turki's sister is Bandar's wife, princess Haifa. She was also the one who was sending money to one of the saudi agents in San Diego who was helping two of the hijackers that were living at an FBI informants house.
Small world.
We know that is a LIE because we know the censored pages in the joint inquiry show foreign goverment involvement.
We do? Show how.
You can show the connection? (not just some faction of)
Can we explore possible reasons an administration (I didn't specify Bush because this hold true today) might want to withhold this information (whatever it might actually be)?
Sound good?
What do you think intelligence agencies do, Jackanory?
They collect data and try to piece things together.
When it comes to 9/11, we have those people lying, distorting and blocking crucial information that would have stopped the 9/11 plot for happening.
What do you think intelligence agencies do, Jackanory?
They collect data and try to piece things together.
When it comes to 9/11, we have those people lying, distorting and blocking crucial information that would have stopped the 9/11 plot for happening.
I just don't see that as being possible given the information we have today.
And this is the reality. This is what intelligence agencies are really for. Lying, deception, spying, assassinations, high-level intrigue, and other assorted shenanigans.
Mafias have their hit squads, while nation-states have "intelligence agencies". They essentially have the same function when you get right down to it.
I would agree. It also shows how a government involvement in something like 9/11 would not go unnoticed or investigated by major world journalists.Yes I saw that documentary and thought it was very good. Frontline documentaries are one of my favourite programs.
I found this episode to be really good also.
Why do you keep equating the Mafia with intelligence agencies?
SpringHallConvert does not speak for people interested in the truth..
You still didn't answer my question. Who should have investigated it?
The media then in-tern the people. This is why "truthers" have been so unsuccessful. They can't convince the media any of their arguments are true.Bingo. That's the big question everyone on this board should be asking and attempting to answer.
When corruption, cronyism, and treason permeate nearly every level of government, and that government murders its own citizens in cold blood, who has the authority, resources, and power to investigate the investigators?