TheL8Elvis
Philosopher
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 8,276
If I am the shooter, and I am not certain the shootee is dead or fully incapacitated, I might well straddle, put weapon to their head and tell them to move their hands out to where they are fully visible. If there is motion (especially offensive motion) without hands coming out, cooty grass time. (If combat is fair, it is being done very incorrectly.)
Based on the so-far available info, I am fairly sure it was not self-defense per the law. I suspect it was hot-head. But I was not there, I do not know. Neither was Sharpton or any others who have fully made up their minds on this.
Could be that Martin was on top of Zimmerman ( as per what the witness reported seeing on the tv interview ) , perhaps even struggling for control of the gun at this point, and Zimmerman shot Martin in the chest, and then rolled over on top of him afterwards, and that's what Mary Cutcher saw. (if indeed she saw much of anything ... I admit, I find her testimony at this point to appear self serving)
That scenario doesn't contradict what we know, except perhaps Zimmermans own statement of being attacked form behind.
IDK what all that means under the SYG law. And FWIW, I think Zimmerman carries a lot of responsibility for the death simply for following Martin, although following someone is not illegal. IDK if just because Zimmerman was some sort of cop wannabe (someone many pages back described the term whacker, and it seemed appropriate) that means when push comes to shove he actually wanted to shoot someone. Maybe. But I think that's still a premature conclusion even based on his past record and behavior.
ETA: after re-reading I need to clarify zimmerman carries all the responsibility for the death and martin should never have been shot ... but it did happen, and I am trying to figure out the scenario based on what information has been released so far
Last edited: