Did Obama really go to Harvard?

[Anders Lindman]

You can't explain things either. I asked, you failed.

But I haven't claimed to be an expert. In the past the high priests had to be trusted or your would be roasted on the stake, literally. Today the high priests have been replaced by experts and the punishment is now merely ridicule (or in professional settings the risk of being fired or worse). So the same blind trust in authority is still being stamped into people.

 

[JayUtah]

Credentials are useful...

If you really believed this, you wouldn't have your panties in such a twist to undermine Obama's. If it really didn't matter that he went to Harvard, then you could just say, "So he's a Harvard man; big deal. It's what he does that counts." But no -- you have to make a huge deal out making sure he doesn't really have those Harvard credentials. Gotta take those away from him at all costs, no matter how silly you look in the process.

But when your credentials are questioned, you sidestep the question altogether. Interesting that your view on the value of credentials flip-flops depending on who is alleged to have them. Pathetic. Really, really pathetic.

 

[Anders Lindman]

There is no hope for you.

Both versions have been edited, the MSNBC version has a tidier edit point on the audio with a blurr, the youtube one has a tidier video edit with a garbled audio.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/want-to-see-new-video-of-barack-obama-from-his-harvard-days/

"The full video will be unveiled Wednesday night during Fox News’ “Hannity,” Pollak said."

That is edited. As in EDITED. They made a cut using the same camera

You can verify for yourself that the word I marked 'inaudible' in my quote stretches a fraction of a second INTO and ACROSS the cut. This means that the audio recording in that video is consecutive. And consequently, two separate cameras had to be used, which is inconsistent with the fact that when the camera filming the professor is panned back to Obama it's filming from the same location as the first camera!

 

[JayUtah]

But I haven't claimed to be an expert.

Nonsense. You claim to be able to tell real videos from fake, and to do it better than other people.

 

[Anders Lindman]

If you really believed this, you wouldn't have your panties in such a twist to undermine Obama's. If it really didn't matter that he went to Harvard, then you could just say, "So he's a Harvard man; big deal. It's what he does that counts." But no -- you have to make a huge deal out making sure he doesn't really have those Harvard credentials. Gotta take those away from him at all costs, no matter how silly you look in the process.

But when your credentials are questioned, you sidestep the question altogether. Interesting that your view on the value of credentials flip-flops depending on who is alleged to have them. Pathetic. Really, really pathetic.

In Obama's case the Harvard credentials are needed to convince the public. I'm sure that his real credentials are from elite learning institutes far more prestigious than Harvard, but to reveal that would be to reveal that Obama has been trained on purpose to become a U.S. President.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Nonsense. You claim to be able to tell real videos from fake, and to do it better than other people.

I make those claims as an ordinary person, not as someone who needs credentials to examine things.

 

[NoahFence]

I remain unconvinced of Obama's supposed Harvard credentials.

Want a cookie?

 

[NoahFence]

I'm sure that his real credentials are from elite learning institutes far more prestigious than Harvard,

You're too much.

Say, care to provide that list of institutes?

 

[Mudcat]

Why not simply the face? Have you personally ever tried to create a convincing doctored image?

I'm willing to wager he hasn't. Dear OP, if I were to doctor a photo to make someone appeared to have done what they didn't I would go with the suggestion suggested above, swap out the face and do some touch up. It is infinately more feasable than what you are suggesting (which is wrong to begin with because he really did go there).

And hey, little advice for your next fail:

 

[Anders Lindman]

You're too much.

Say, care to provide that list of institutes?

Ha ha. Do you think I'm a member of the secret cabal? I have no clue what those institutes are. Conspiracy researchers have mentioned how talented students are taken out of the ordinary education system and put into 'real deal' education programs.

 

[NoahFence]

Ha ha. Do you think I'm a member of the secret cabal? I have no clue what those institutes are. Conspiracy researchers have mentioned how talented students are taken out of the ordinary education system and put into 'real deal' education programs.

So he went to a college more presigious than Harvard, YOUR ASSERTION, yet you can't name any?

In my world, that's called dishonesty.

Par for your course.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So he went to a college more presigious than Harvard, YOUR ASSERTION, yet you can't name any?

In my world, that's called dishonesty.

Par for your course.

In my world it's called conspiracy theory.

 

[TheRedWorm]

YOU may not believe the evidence for Obama going to Harvard has been doctored but I KNOW how ITS authenticity of it has been FAKED.

No. You really don't. All you are doing is trolling. You aren't even an interesting troll.

 

[Erock]

You can verify for yourself that the word I marked 'inaudible' in my quote stretches a fraction of a second INTO and ACROSS the cut. This means that the audio recording in that video is consecutive. And consequently, two separate cameras had to be used, which is inconsistent with the fact that when the camera filming the professor is panned back to Obama it's filming from the same location as the first camera!

No it doesn't!!!

This is done in almost every single interview or news broadcast you will ever see. The audio is overlaid across the cut.

Seriously, watch the video below(one will play in your region hopefully) it is highly informative about the TV tricks of the trade and how unethical edits are performed, and how easy it is to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07NMglQX6gE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH_9QcMCkvg

 

[Anders Lindman]

No. You really don't. All you are doing is trolling. You aren't even an interesting troll.

You don't need to be an expert in image editing to see that Obama's head is too large in this image: http://www.dancewithshadows.com/celebrity/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/barack-obama-harvard.jpg

Compare with the actual size of Obama's head: http://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/hil-b-2.jpg

 

[Anders Lindman]

No it doesn't!!!

This is done in almost every single interview or news broadcast you will ever see. The audio is overlaid across the cut.

Seriously, watch the video below(one will play in your region hopefully) it is highly informative about the TV tricks of the trade and how unethical edits are performed, and how easy it is to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07NMglQX6gE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH_9QcMCkvg

Wrong! Obama's lip movements are in sync with the audio both before and after the cut.

 

[R.A.F.]

In my world it's called conspiracy theory.

In my world, It's called "allowing idiots access to the internet."

 

[R.A.F.]

I make those claims as an ordinary person, not as someone who needs credentials to examine things.

Thankyou for exposing your ignorance for all to see....

 

[NoahFence]

In my world it's called conspiracy theory.

"Conspiracy Theorist" is just another word for "Dishonest Person".

 

[R.A.F.]

I remain unconvinced of Obama's supposed Harvard credentials.

Big woop....no one cares about your uninformed opinions because of how wrong you continue to be about well, practically everything.

So your claim is, Harvard lies about their graduates? Good luck with that one...



Is there any conspiracy theory Anders hasn't "fallen in love" with?? I'm thinking that a "list" of those "theories" he doesn't believe would be much shorter than a list than those he does believe.