Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
GlennB said:
If he said that then he's implying that every part of both Towers was doused with unimaginably vast amounts of thermite.

Therefore he's barking mad or having a bit of fun. Either way .....
Click to expand...

No, he is not having fun, he is really quite upset.
And he has always said that there must have been tons upon tons of thermite.
 
Oystein said:
No, he is not having fun, he is really quite upset.
And he has always said that there must have been tons upon tons of thermite.
Click to expand...

Then he should be mocked and / or ignored like every other idiot truther. He's not special in any way, and shouldn't be afforded any kindness.
 
chrismohr said:
All fragments
that are shot out of the towers have white, regular traces behind
them. What do you think they are?
Click to expand...

Its just dust. The dust in a demolition isn't caused by thermite either (because they dont use thermite), its not even caused by explosives.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Please provide your link that "refutes" David Chandler's analysis of the debris exploding, sped up descent and change of direction.
Click to expand...
Can anyone actually provide a link for Clayton on this? It was discussed extensively on some JREF thread and I don't have time to dig it up. If someone else can help here I'd be grateful.
 
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8071929#post8071929

At 13 minutes

Mr. Mohr would you please explain that?
Click to expand...

A pyroclastic flow (also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current[1]) is a fast-moving current of superheated gas (which can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F)) and rock (collectively known as tephra), which reaches speeds moving away from a volcano of up to 700 km/h (450 mph).


You need to explain where the volcano was first.
 
These guys clearly received heavy burns after being trapped under a car melted from the pyroclastic flow.



Just look at all that paper burning in the intense 1800F heat!
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8071929#post8071929

At 13 minutes

Mr. Mohr would you please explain that?
Click to expand...

Mohr called Gage out for using that term I think in their debate. Pyroclastic clouds is not only demonstrably false but if Gage is still saying that then he is being srsly dishonest.

I took a minor in geology because of my interest in YEC claims, I didn't think that I would also be able to see how absurd 911 CT claims were with that minor as well.
 
Edx said:
In what way was it pyroclastic?

You know you get a dust cloud in buildings that collpase without explosives, right?
You know you get a dust cloud in explosive demolition, but that its not created by explosives or thermite, right?
Click to expand...

Mount Vesuvius was an active nanothermitic volcano at one point in time.
 
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8071929#post8071929

At 13 minutes

Mr. Mohr would you please explain that?
Click to expand...

Well, simple really. It didn't happen.

Image290.jpg


243136879


fire_trucks-01.jpg


memory-remains-fdny-firetruck_37803_600x450.jpg


Notice a common thing in all of these photos?

99.9% of all the aluminum is still there. Plastics and cloth, not so much.

Debunked. And whomever said that, is a complete moron and a liar.
 
Look, Tri, they were covered in dust, thats the same thing as being melted. GAWD. :rolleyes:;)
 
Edx said:
In what way was it pyroclastic?

You know you get a dust cloud in buildings that collpase without explosives, right?
You know you get a dust cloud in explosive demolition, but that its not created by explosives or thermite, right?
Click to expand...

Maybe they meant protoplasmic flow, the stuff you get when the beams touch.
 
NoahFence said:
please don't tell me in 2012 that's some seriously still saying pyroclastic clouds were there on 911.
Click to expand...
Just look at the video where CM got his quote from:
[nfurl]www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6eMq5Rit1w[/nfurl]

"2012 New 9/11 Documentary"

CM's quote starts at minute 13:05 more or less. It shows cars burnt by fires, probably because of the fire passing from car to car, and claims that the pyroclastic cloud did it.
 
chrismohr said:
Can anyone actually provide a link for Clayton on this? It was discussed extensively on some JREF thread and I don't have time to dig it up. If someone else can help here I'd be grateful.
Click to expand...

Chris,

Sure thing, since you ask. Don't be misled into thinking that CM posted this question because he wants to learn something, tho.

Here's my response to the tech nonsense that is Chandler's claim.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7632808&postcount=402


Tom
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom