Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 26,461
I think you ment bookie...
Due to points of rotation of our planet or the hemisphere at time of event. In relation to tides, volcanic and seismic events.
Dates as follows: 5/31 6/12 9/16 11/14/12 Next year: 2/10 2/11 3/6 4/9 4/10 5/10 7/8 11/12/13.
Give me a Nevada spread of a couple dates before and after. Before marking signs from animals as in birds flying eratically and pets on edge. After - aftershocks.
Microseismic earthquakes (magnitude less than 1.0 to about 2.0), measured by seismographs but not felt by humans, occur on average every other day in the NMSZ (more than 200 per year).
Wherever there has not been an event recently. Or it could heighten intensity of one...
Ah. A different kind of seismic event.Prostitution is legal in Nevada.
I think you meant meant.
And no Sideroxylon was correct. "Bookie" is just an abbreviation of Bookmaker.
These are sentence fragments. Can you clarify what you are trying to say?Due to points of rotation of our planet or the hemisphere at time of event. In relation to tides, volcanic and seismic events.
There are about 500,000 measurable earthquakes every year. That works out at roughly 1300 per day. Predicting that there may be an earthquake on a few dates (with a spread of 2 days either side!) isn't really very impressive. Give us the magnitude and location, and you might be taken seriously.
Or were you hoping that no-one on this board would be aware of how many earthquakes there are each year?
Since your location remains undeclared, your on your own. If where you are is prone to any events as mentioned and has not had a large( measureable) or above normal(?..) occurence of late then...well I don't know why I even waste my time....I doubt rc is ever going to answer these questions.
I would like to be proven wrong.
As long as specifics are given of course.
Since your location remains undeclared, your on your own. If where you are is prone to any events as mentioned and has not had a large( measureable) or above normal(?..) occurence of late then...well I don't know why I even waste my time....
Let's go with catastrophic...Uh huh, sure and what level exactly? Recent event of what size?
Sure, whatever...
Let's go with catastrophic...
I thought a bookie took bets and a bookmaker kept the logs for a business...You are not going to answer my question, are you. Let me have a go then. No bookie (since you prefer the informal shortened form of the term) would touch it because of the sloppy amount of wriggle room you have provided for yoursellf to claim success in most any outcome.
I thought a bookie took bets and a bookmaker kept the logs for a business...
...and a bookmaker kept the logs for a business...