• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Origin of the paint that was found as red-gray chips - any ideas?

I originally asked Dr. Harrit that very question at the Toronto 9/11 Hearings last September.

He stated emphatically that the Bentham Paper research team had had clear communication with Tillotson and were told that the DSC testing was conducted in open air.

I have brought your assertion and accusation of lying to their attention and received a prompt reply that they would never engage in such a charade and that their information came directly from Tillotson and Gash.

MM
Has Dr Harrit commented on what Tillotson and Gash think of their paper? Certainly they have run their results by them.
 
I couldn't care less whether you accept my stated credentials.

Insomuch as you gainsay the credentials of others, it only seems fair that you provide some proof of your claimed bona fides. Sauce for the goose and all that.

If you were one of the few people here I trusted and respected, it would be worth my while to provide proof.

Oh that's rich. I don't care who you are in particular just that you provide some evidence that someone with your claimed skillset would have.

Is it really that daunting?

I have never supported those absurd no-planer postulations. The idea of realtime insertion of a CGI plane using AMC is so laughable you look like a fool for just referring to it.

I don't buy it for a moment. But for those not in the suite, why is it so laughable?

Obviously there's a subset of the 'truther' movement who does buy into i and Ace Baker in particular has made a cottage industry of it. However, if you're unable to answer the question, do appreciate that it throws your claimed bona fides into doubt as to anything video-related

Fitz
 
I originally asked Dr. Harrit that very question at the Toronto 9/11 Hearings last September.

He stated emphatically that the Bentham Paper research team had had clear communication with Tillotson and were told that the DSC testing was conducted in open air.

I have brought your assertion and accusation of lying to their attention and received a prompt reply that they would never engage in such a charade and that their information came directly from Tillotson and Gash.

MM

The Bentham paper research team. Huh.

Did they also ask Tillotson whether he'd be interested in "peer reviewing" their vanity paper too? Or had Joney already lined up the fellow travelers already?
 
Still fishin' trolling, I see.

MM

Still got less than nothing, I see.

Good for you.

Say, did you ask the Bentham paper team how many ther*te matches they think were needed to set off the conventional explosives, and what a *********** ridiculous hypothesis that is?
 
Last edited:
So, here is another truther article on the incoming presentation of Jim Millette.
Kevin Ryan is probably the author, it has a title "Where Mohr is Less" and is full of silly and unfair accusations of Chris Mohr and Jim Millette (first of all). Anyway, Kevin Ryan (?) seems to be rather nervous now:cool:

For years we've heard the drumbeat of "new investigation, new investigation" now that there's a new investigation they're running from it like cockroaches running from the light, spewing poison behind them.

/How's them kumquats?
I love it so./JAD off
 
Chris,

Kevin Ryan wrote
Kevin Ryan said:
In attempts to obtain pre-processed samples from me, Mohr has also engaged in deception and has made false statements about our communications.
This is a claim whose veracity can't be assessed without seeing the actual communications. Were these entirely by e-mail, and do you have copies of the entire exchange? Then maybe you could ask Kevin to publish the entire exchange, so that people can see for themselves if his allegation holds water!?
 
So, here is another truther article on the incoming presentation of Jim Millette.
Kevin Ryan is probably the author, it has a title "Where Mohr is Less" and is full of silly and unfair accusations of Chris Mohr and Jim Millette (first of all). Anyway, Kevin Ryan (?) seems to be rather nervous now:cool:

The fear is palpable in the truther community.

By the way, after reading his screed it is clear that Kevin Ryan is an anti-intellectual scumbag of the highest order
 
I noticed Kevin also uses the R.J. Lee report as confirmation of his findings. Wasn't that already addressed?

It is funny seeing the deer in the headlights reaction to the new analysis. If it's one thing Mr. Ryan can do without fail, it's make bold statements with absolutely nothing to back it up.
 
I wrote a long reply to this latest blog entry. We'll see if Kevin Ryan posts it.

Chris I notice you never made mention of the Cate Jenkins EPA whistle blowing
report that prominently features Lab Guy Dr. Millette?

You seemed to think that our only interest was Millette's not being more open about his observation of iron microspheres.

MM
 

Back
Top Bottom