9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

7forever said:
The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the planes myth.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcrightenginefake.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcboeingcgi.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

The funny thing is, one class in theater lighting would help you understand why you're wrong.
 
cjnewson88 said:
... Why do I do this to myself..



Wrong.
[qimg]http://i962.photobucket.com/albums/ae107/sniperNZSAS/wtcrightenginefake.jpg[/qimg]




Wrong Again.
[qimg]http://i962.photobucket.com/albums/ae107/sniperNZSAS/wtcboeingcgi.jpg[/qimg]

I guess this is fake too?
Click to expand...

All images are fakes, 100 percent. The weird elongated patterns are most obvious.
 
beachnut said:
You have delusions on 911. Why can't you understand RADAR?
You manufacture evidence, and it does not support your claims. That is bad, you can't even fake your evidence to match your delusion.

RADAR data proves your claims false. Making fun of people murdered by terrorists; your goal?

Have you contacted 60 minutes? ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, anyone? No

You can't figure out 911, JFK, and what else? You don't use evidence, you use nonsense.
Click to expand...

You have delusions on 911. Why can't you understand RADAR?
You believe in fake evidence, and it does not support your claims. That is bad, you can't even fake your evidence to match your delusion.

RADAR data proves fake 175 had to be behind the towers and most footage shows fake imagery coming from the west.

I solved jfk over a year ago and have done awesome work on 911 that others are afraid of because there was a drone and no plane of any kind. You don't use evidence, you use nonsense that was broadcast on tv and cannot in a millions years validate one of those fake images.
 
I always knew it was a bad idea to allow internet access at the local asylum....
 
NoahFence said:
It appears they're having some sort of contest, where the most asinine, retarded theories win. It's tough to call a winner to be honest.
Click to expand...

It is proven that the government and media produced a theory of arab hijackers and left behind the real evidence confirming cgi and drones for both towers.
 
Garrison said:
Because people like you keep proposing such ludicrous alternatives that the official explanation is by far the most plausible and best evidenced. The 'no planes' theory is so insane that I have to assume that those who advocate it are by and large trolls.
Click to expand...

Because people cannot challenge basic evidence stemming from footage that's been ignored. The bogey showed up in 4 broadcasts and that can't be refuted in any way. The official explanation is by far the most retarded. The 'no planes' truth is so sane that I have to assume that those who advocate it are honest.
 
7forever said:
The same silly fake images are used by both sleuths like myself and denialists like you.
Click to expand...

I've met hundreds of people who saw it with their own eyes. Even a few who happened to see the first impact. They're all lying? I don't think so.
 
Oystein said:
Nuh. It discourages willful self-deluding.

I don't even know what you are saying there. I see a plane and a plane and the same plane again. The plane that had passengers aboard that are now dearly missed by their loved ones. The plane that rained plane debris over lower Manhattan. The plane that everybody saw. The plane that was captured by dozends of video cameras.
You know, that plane.




ETA: For crying out loud - I chatted a few minutes with real world friends, and the troll got half a dozend replies in the meantime - including my own. :D
Click to expand...

You see an orb and then a minute later a fake plane with no wings and dots for engines. The dot and fake image had no passengers aboard. No one saw any planes on the ground, they saw a drone.
 
Justin39640 said:
I've met hundreds of people who saw it with their own eyes. Even a few who happened to see the first impact. They're all lying? I don't think so.
Click to expand...

If all the footage showed a plane, then you'd be okay, but ny1, wnbc, cbs, and wb11 showed a drone coming from directly west. Only cbs did not air it live.
 
7forever said:
You see an orb and then a minute later a fake plane with no wings and dots for engines. The dot and fake image had no passengers aboard. No one saw any planes on the ground, they saw a drone.
Click to expand...

You're speaking for millions. Literally. Everyone who had a view of the Towers was watching it burn when the South Tower got hit.

I don't think a lot of people can comprehend just how big they were and just how much they stuck out in an already impressive skyline.
 
OhDear.gif
 
7forever said:
You see an orb and then a minute later a fake plane with no wings and dots for engines. The dot and fake image had no passengers aboard. No one saw any planes on the ground, they saw a drone.
Click to expand...

You fail to understand resolution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom