9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the planes myth.

wtcrightenginefake.jpg

wtcboeingcgi.jpg
 
7forever said:
The deluded people that believe planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. Planers are willfully ignorant and for entertainment purposes only.
Click to expand...

Oh, good comeback. Your debate mojo is strong :boggled:
 
7forever said:
Honest question...why are you guys so against accepting that the government has ********** us all and have been doing so, way before we even made it here?
Click to expand...

Honest answer: Because there is no evidence for inside job :)
 
7forever said:
The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the planes myth.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcrightenginefake.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcboeingcgi.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
Troll
 
7forever said:
Honest question...why are you guys so against accepting that the government has ********** us all and have been doing so, way before we even made it here?
Click to expand...

I don't accept the absolutely idiotic idea that there were no planes that struck the WTC buildings. I may choose to accept or not accept anything else you accuse the government of depending on the evidence that exists to support it.

You know, like rational, responsible people do.

Don't go pulling the standard woo woo act of insinuating that just because we think your ideas are moronic, that means we trust the government no matter what.
 
7forever said:
Honest question...why are you guys so against accepting that the government has ********** us all and have been doing so, way before we even made it here?
Click to expand...

Because people like you keep proposing such ludicrous alternatives that the official explanation is by far the most plausible and best evidenced. The 'no planes' theory is so insane that I have to assume that those who advocate it are by and large trolls.
 
It appears they're having some sort of contest, where the most asinine, retarded theories win. It's tough to call a winner to be honest.
 
7forever said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIyGEDvG9KQ&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=34
Advance to 5:33 and see the last bogey showing before the plane morph is aired one minute later. They showed the bogey 6-10 times in 23 minutes. What a shame it is that such an active forum encourages willful ignorance.:boggled:

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcwb11926.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcwb927.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Nuh. It discourages willful self-deluding.

I don't even know what you are saying there. I see a plane and a plane and the same plane again. The plane that had passengers aboard that are now dearly missed by their loved ones. The plane that rained plane debris over lower Manhattan. The plane that everybody saw. The plane that was captured by dozends of video cameras.
You know, that plane.




ETA: For crying out loud - I chatted a few minutes with real world friends, and the troll got half a dozend replies in the meantime - including my own. :D
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
The deluded people that believe planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. Planers are willfully ignorant and for entertainment purposes only.
Click to expand...
You have delusions on 911. Why can't you understand RADAR?
You manufacture evidence, and it does not support your claims. That is bad, you can't even fake your evidence to match your delusion.

RADAR data proves your claims false. Making fun of people murdered by terrorists; your goal?

Have you contacted 60 minutes? ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, anyone? No

You can't figure out 911, JFK, and what else? You don't use evidence, you use nonsense.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
EventHorizon said:
I don't see anybody here encouraging you.
Click to expand...
You replied.

:boxedin:
Click to expand...
I thought that I was the only one making that obvious comment.

Don't feed trolls. They are after attention. Giving them attention feeds their egos. Let 'em starve or at least put them on a diet. :rolleyes:

DGM said:
I'm wondering at this point. Are the trolls having a competition, or are they all the same lonely person?

:(
Click to expand...
I seriously doubt if any of the most active trolls are one person playing two or more roles.

They have widely differing styles which they maintain with fair consistency and easily detected differences. They also show significant differences in the intellectual level of the material in their posts.

We currently have examples of regulars who are very successful at making sure the debate does not progress by perennially sending it round in circles. At a lower standard of trolling we see those who seem unable to post anything smarter than snide comments or overt personal insults.. Then the "lurking nit pickers" style of those who never join in debate other than when they seize on any minor loophole some debunker leaves in his logic.

So I doubt anyone would be a good enough character actor to play those differing roles undetected.

Then again I could be wrong. ;)
 
... Why do I do this to myself..

7forever said:
The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage.
Click to expand...

Wrong.
wtcrightenginefake.jpg



This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be.
Click to expand...

Wrong Again.
wtcboeingcgi.jpg


I guess this is fake too?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom