Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
FreemanMenard said:
I also note that without even knowing what I am talking about, you reject it, and vilify me for presenting it, or being about to.
Click to expand...

Presenting what exactly? I'll let you into a secret Rob, none of us know what you're talking about, literally. You have not provided your method, therefore we have to infer what the hell you are talking about. Without more information, our best guess so far is that it's a load of nonsense.


FreemanMenard said:
You have already began operating on the belief that in order for it to work, we have to stiff someone.
Click to expand...

Again, for what to work? What are you talking about?


FreemanMenard said:
Luckily you have remedy available. If you personally disagree with this process when explained, all you have to do is not employ it yourself.
Click to expand...

At last, now we're getting somewhere, does this mean you are about to explain this process?

I'm going to go with........no.
 
deeper said:
Presenting what exactly? I'll let you into a secret Rob, none of us know what you're talking about, literally. You have not provided your method, therefore we have to infer what the hell you are talking about. Without more information, our best guess so far is that it's a load of nonsense.




Again, for what to work? What are you talking about?




At last, now we're getting somewhere, does this mean you are about to explain this process?

I'm going to go with........no.
Click to expand...

Not yet, and not first here. I have a bit more research to do, and will be presenting it this Sunday, videotaping it and creating a new video production. I promise to post a link when it is completed. Thank you for your patience.
 
FreemanMenard said:
Not yet, and not first here. I have a bit more research to do, and will be presenting it this Sunday, videotaping it and creating a new video production. I promise to post a link when it is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I'll look forward to that.
 
Luckily you have remedy available. If you personally disagree with this process when explained, all you have to do is not employ it yourself. Simple right? Or did you wish to also stop others from doing so because you do not wish to, even though they have the right?
Click to expand...

Great stuff Rob, for you to have found remedy you must have moved on from your previous stance because we all know that doesn't work.

I look forward to your new found claims and hope that everyone can use them to free themselves from the bounds that enslave them.
 
I hope that whatever this new process is, that I can use it to buy Rob's DVDs from him.
Click to expand...
I bet that one line has just thrown Rob into total turmoil and he now has to re-think his whole theory to avoid him from having to distribute his videos to people in exchange for nothing.

Im going to order a million copies as soon as he reveals his new plan. :D
 
Well, since he's making it all up as he goes along, I'm sure Rob knows the magic words to counter his own magic words.
 
jargon buster said:
I bet that one line has just thrown Rob into total turmoil and he now has to re-think his whole theory to avoid him from having to distribute his videos to people in exchange for nothing.

Im going to order a million copies as soon as he reveals his new plan. :D
Click to expand...


I forced myself to watch one of his Youtube videos, and I believe he claimed that one can only draw against one's "birth bond" for necessities--food, rent, utilities, etc., so I imagine that will be his defense (or "defence," for all you Commonwealth types :p).
 
Yep the faceless side of commerce, he knows that face to face it simply would result in him being arrested.
Utilities and credit cards,loans and how to avoid your responsibilities, its an easy argument to sell to cowards who don't want to pay their way.
 
FreemanMenard said:
Not yet, and not first here. I have a bit more research to do, and will be presenting it this Sunday, videotaping it and creating a new video production. I promise to post a link when it is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Click to expand...


Upon reflection, I think you are being a bit modest Rob. Considering you are about to change the way that the world conducts business, a televised press conference is probably the way to go.
 
Odd.
I were at a restaurant this weekend, and when presented with the bill for me and my parents I just left a pair of notes. Perhaps I should have tried signing it in some way or other instead?

Could someone (Robert Menard) explain how the place could have recuperated the bill from my signature?
 
FreemanMenard said:
Not yet, and not first here. I have a bit more research to do, and will be presenting it this Sunday, videotaping it and creating a new video production. I promise to post a link when it is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Click to expand...
Alternatively, you could just try it out at a local restaurant to see if it actually works.

But I guess it's a little difficult to package and sell abject failure.
 
Horatius said:
Come now! FoTLer Gurus have been doing just that for years now!
Click to expand...
True. But as long the gurus only preach and don't practice, they can continue to blame failures on their followers rather than on the teachings.
 
arayder said:
The difference between me and you is that I don’t sell imbalanced wannabes like Lance Thatcher $800 worth of useless documents on the promise they can beat the rap using them and then run from the bad deed when it’s time for an accounting.

http://www.kamloopsnews.ca/article/...t-fuelled-freeman-8217-s-beliefs-says-ex-wife
Click to expand...

I wasn't aware of Thatchers vulnerability. If Menard knew about his health problems it inevitably makes his conduct even more disgraceful.
 
FreemanMenard said:
Abuse and cheat the working class people? Wow. Dude, WE are the working class people who are tired of being cheated and abused by the politician class, lawyer class, and banker class.

I also note that without even knowing what I am talking about, you reject it, and vilify me for presenting it, or being about to. This is what I am talking about when I say defending previously held misconceptions. For now it won't really matter to you if I am right, or what words I bring to the table, you have a vested interest in rejecting it, lest you be seen even in your own mind as wrong. And if I call this outlook childish, which it s, you cry about that.

You have already began operating on the belief that in order for it to work, we have to stiff someone. What if however it is we being stiffed, and all we have to do is learn how and then take lawful steps to avoid being further stiffed? What if these actions benefit the small business owner, and does not stiff them at all? Your prejudice is so overwhelming and debilitating you will never even be able to see the truth. Hatred has that affect.

Rejection of everything that does not fit into your preconceived beliefs is not being skeptical. It is the opposite, for a true skeptic should first and foremost be skeptical of that which he believes.

Luckily you have remedy available. If you personally disagree with this process when explained, all you have to do is not employ it yourself. Simple right? Or did you wish to also stop others from doing so because you do not wish to, even though they have the right?
Click to expand...

That's laughable, Menard. Your methods, if you ever grew the stones to use them, would cheat restaurant owners out of the check. . . .then you parse words and play debate games to make it sound like I just don't understand your "brilliance".

I know thievery when I see, it ole son.
 
Last edited:
gtm said:
I wasn't aware of Thatchers vulnerability. If Menard knew about his health problems it inevitably makes his conduct even more disgraceful.
Click to expand...

I don't know what Menard knew, but I doubt he would have cared.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom