• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Whitney Houston dead

I'm so glad I don't watch or listen to music TV and radio, I wouldn't be able to cope with the endless playing of that awful of cover of "Iiiiiii-eeeeee-iiiiii Will Always Love Yoooooo-OOOOO" that I'm sure we're in for over the coming weeks.

As for the question of talent: meh. She was no Freddie Mercury.
 
So You got nothing, just what I thought.

Codswallop. What you thought was that you could make me go and write a list of 30 names and then laugh at me. Sorry, not playing your stupid games.

Since you've already acknowledged that you have no way of distinguishing between a genuine list and a list I've completely made up, what possible point would there be in producing one?

It's called motive. It's actually important, despite anything you might have heard to the contrary.

And the goalposts start to move, just as I suspected!
 
Why does yours? Because you agree with the majority?
I'm not the one who insists components of talent don't count to make a point.

Shifting burden of proof, really? How the heck do you provide evidence for a negative? You're the one claiming that something useful and beneficial came from these artists. You prove it.
Ok, what evidence will you accept that will show they provided something useful & beneficial?


Ah that was my mistake, sorry. Speaking of which, do you 'remember' the others?
Yep.
 
Codswallop. What you thought was that you could make me go and write a list of 30 names and then laugh at me. Sorry, not playing your stupid games. Since you've already acknowledged that you have no way of distinguishing between a genuine list and a list I've completely made up

Edited by LashL: 
Removed breach.
That's what Google is for. Even obscure artists turn up on it these days.

Produce this list, and I will apologize and admit I am wrong. I already done it once already on this thread and I'm not too prideful not to do it again.
Mathew Best said:
what possible point would there be in producing one?
Intellectual honesty, perhaps?

Matthew Best said:
And the goalposts start to move, just as I suspected!
:confused: I thought it (motive) was already understood (to be important). :confused:
Guess my initial impression about you was right.

When a Moderator edits your post for a breach of the M.A., do not thereafter edit it yourself to remove the Mod's edit.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you can't do it.

Don't want to read up thread? Meh, here you go:

Mudcat said:
I've also conceded that the music industry does provide some benefit, it generates revenue and provides jobs. Since I'm being generous I'll even concede it helps do charity related stuff, despite my misgivings about their motives for doing so. No such thing as a completely selfless act, so I can't criticize them too harshly.

Doesn't mention 'artists' specifically but since everyone seems to have comprehension fail today let me spell it out for you, Music Industry includes it's most recognizable participants: the 'artists'.

Generating revenue? Practical, beneficial, useful.

Providing jobs? Same notation.

Charity events? Dubious about their effectiveness and motivations, but still practical, beneficial and useful.

Are you satisfied?
 
Last edited:
alleged "music" tv channel.
I haven´t seen _any_ music on MTV in several years. If I open the channel, on my way scrolling to some other channel, they _always_ have some reality show like the Hogans or something. No music.
 
Too lazy to read up thread? Meh, here you go:
Nope. Just wanted to make you point out the weakness in your argument yourself.


Doesn't mention 'artists' specifically but since everyone seems to have comprehension fail today let me spell it out for you: Music Industry includes it's most recognizable participants the 'artists'.

Generating revenue? Practical, beneficial, useful.

Providing jobs? Same notation.

Charity events? Dubious about their effectiveness and motivations, but still practical, beneficial and useful.

Are you satisfied?
Nope. Still just your opinion & you haven't backed up your claim with anything more than your opinion. Its not surprising since art is subjective & people get from it what they will.
You don't like modern music & that's fine. You want to try to tie reason & logic to art, that's just sad.
 
I haven´t seen _any_ music on MTV in several years. If I open the channel, on my way scrolling to some other channel, they _always_ have some reality show like the Hogans or something. No music.

Bowling for Soup, "1985":


"Bruce Springsteen, Madonna
Way before Nirvana
There was U2 and Blondie
And music still on MTV"
 
Nope. Just wanted to make you point out the weakness in your argument yourself.
Only weakness in my previous argument I can see is that I was looking for a different type of usefulness and value, and failed to see the business aspect of it.


Redtail said:
Nope. Still just your opinion & you haven't backed up your claim with anything more than your opinion.
I've admitted I was wrong and pointed out where I was wrong and you aren't satisfied with that? Really, what more do you want?

Redtail said:
Art is subjective & people get from it what they will.
True enough
Redtail said:
You don't like modern music & that's fine. You want to try to tie reason & logic to art, that's just sad.
How is it 'sad'?
 
And listening to that dirge will have made that time seem much longer. Bonus!

My comment on FB when I posted the vid:

Hadn't thought of her in years, and she was too ubiquitous for me when she was famous & good, but underneath all that she had real skill and talent. It's sad*, but somewhat nice that people are appreciated en masse after they die.

*depressing and rather pathetic
 
Only weakness in my previous argument I can see is that I was looking for a different type of usefulness and value, and failed to see the business aspect of it.
K.

I've admitted I was wrong and pointed out where I was wrong and you aren't satisfied with that? Really, what more do you want?
Wait for it...
How is it 'sad'?
Because it's not about logic & reason, its about feeling emotion. Granted they can overlap, but though many people on this forum could break down the who, what, where, & why of Iago (From Shakespeare's Othello), few, if any, could make people hate him like I could.

Same with Whitney, Elvis, Micheal, etc... It would take you less than a day to learn the lyrics. Odds are, if you had a year to work out the logic & reason behind why their hits, "hit" so to speak, you would go on stage and fail in an epic fashion.

Yet they could take the lyrics of pretty much any song you choose & receive a standing ovation if not make it a hit. That is talent. You may not like it, you may deny it... but its a fact.
 
He was dead a long time before I was born, meant to cite this source. This is called citing. You might try doing the same.


Even more shocking to the idea of Lennon as a secular leftist, or a deep thinker, the man rejected evolution. “Nor do I think we came from monkeys, by the way,” he insisted. “That’s another piece of garbage. What the hell’s it based on? We couldn’t’ve come from anything—fish, maybe, but not monkeys. I don’t believe in the evolution of fish to monkeys to men. Why aren’t monkeys changing into men now? It’s absolute garbage.”

That's so sad coming from John Lennon. I always thought he was smarter than that. He even resorts to the old "why aren't monkeys changing into men now" line. So sad.
 

Back
Top Bottom