Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
Fark headline: Whitney Houston beats Bobby Brown to death.
Sick, but I laughed.
Damn, so did I.
I blame Lisa.
Fark headline: Whitney Houston beats Bobby Brown to death.
Sick, but I laughed.
Hey, Look at what happened to Sci-Fi cinema since Star Wars' success. Just because a bunch of low-talent hacks try to copy a success, does not diminish the quality or talent of the artist that inspired them.
Back on topic: I agree with Complexity here. How exactly does Whitney Houston, Michael Jackson or Elvis Presley count as 'talented'? Could they do something useful, practical or beneficial? The answer is a resounding no. You take away their charisma and nothing separates them from the wanna-be leaches trying to imitate them. In less than a month's time someone else will take her place and she will be forgotten, and you will realize that Complexity was right.
Back on topic: I agree with Complexity here. How exactly does Whitney Houston, Michael Jackson or Elvis Presley count as 'talented'? Could they do something useful, practical or beneficial? The answer is a resounding no. You take away their charisma and nothing separates them from the wanna-be leaches trying to imitate them. In less than a month's time someone else will take her place and she will be forgotten, and you will realize that Complexity was right.
Who still talks about him apart from the occasional CT crackpots suggesting he's still alive or some nonsense like that?Are you suggesting that Elvis has been forgotten? Michael Jackson?
Try disinterested. I didn't even know the useless girl died till I heard about it a few minutes ago. On an MMO.Mathew Best said:You seem to be deluded.
Fark headline: Whitney Houston beats Bobby Brown to death.
Sick, but I laughed.
They had the looks, and knew how to use them. Their singing abilities weren't particularly good or unique, so if they didn't have those previously mentioned looks or an inordinate amount of luck no one would have ever given them the time of day.If Whitney, MJ and Elvis were not talented, the word has no meaning. Not to mention words like "useful", "practical" and "beneficial".
I think you should look up the term trolling.lionking said:Are you just trolling, or can you support your contentions?
I don't know, have any singers done anything worthwhile with their undeserved fortune?I also ask Mudcat, does any singer, ever, meet your standard of talent?
They had the looks, and knew how to use them. Their singing abilities weren't particularly good or unique, so if they didn't have those previously mentioned looks or an inordinate amount of luck no one would have ever given them the time of day.
They had the looks, and knew how to use them. Their singing abilities weren't particularly good or unique, so if they didn't have those previously mentioned looks or an inordinate amount of luck no one would have ever given them the time of day.
I think you should look up the term trolling.
Now, can singing save a life? Build a bridge? Deliver people to their family safely? Put a man on the moon? Build better knowledge to give to future generations? Rebuild buildings destroyed by natural disasters or the malicious intent of human beings? Anything apart from this wooish "It motivates people and gives me something better than silence to listen to"?
I don't know, have any singers done anything worthwhile with their undeserved fortune?
Otherwise my respect goes something like this:
- Pond scum
- Actors
- Singers
- Sports players
Note, that at least singers rate higher than sports players.
I think you should look up the term trolling.
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted".
I didn't even know the useless girl died till I heard about it a few minutes ago. On an MMO.
They had the looks, and knew how to use them. Their singing abilities weren't particularly good or unique, so if they didn't have those previously mentioned looks or an inordinate amount of luck no one would have ever given them the time of day.
I think you should look up the term trolling.
Now, can singing save a life? Build a bridge? Deliver people to their family safely? Put a man on the moon? Build better knowledge to give to future generations? Rebuild buildings destroyed by natural disasters or the malicious intent of human beings? Anything apart from this wooish "It motivates people and gives me something better than silence to listen to"?
I don't know, have any singers done anything worthwhile with their undeserved fortune?
Otherwise my respect goes something like this:
- Pond scum
- Actors
- Singers
- Sports players
Note, that at least singers rate higher than sports players.
Good to great singing voices, good to great dancing ability ( though I would rate Houston as fair.) the ability to make millions feel emotion through performance.Back on topic: I agree with Complexity here. How exactly does Whitney Houston, Michael Jackson or Elvis Presley count as 'talented'?
To millions of people, yes. Hell, the ability to put emotions & intent to song alone covers all three quite wellCould they do something useful, practical or beneficial?
Explain.The answer is a resounding no.
Like saying if you take away Einstien's, Dawkins', & Hitchens' intelligence nothing separates them from a Jr high science teacher.You take away their charisma and nothing separates them from the wanna-be leaches trying to imitate them.
In less than a month's time someone else will take her place and she will be forgotten, and you will realize that Complexity was right.
Drug addicts imbue your notion of culture?Yeah, who needs culture anyway?
http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/11/showbiz/whitney-houston-dead/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
A sadly predictable end.