Somebody riddle me this.

[EventHorizon]

Lol Where?

Is that a serious question? It's no wonder you won't learn anything. You can't even see what's right in front of your face.

 

[Mr.Herbert]

Quote:
2) "Fence sitter" receives numerous responses, with at least a few detailed and sourced answers.

Because real skeptics always have a position on a subject first, and don't need to ask questions.




Lol Where?

That19Guy

Somebody riddle me this……. <snip – Jaqing off ->

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=8007728#post8007728
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=8007786#post8007786
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=8007901#post8007901
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=8009156#post8009156


what a d-bag

 

[cjnewson88]

I sense a little SuperLogicalThinker in this OP.

I had a guy message me on youtube a couple of weeks ago saying SuperLogicalThinker = Brian Good.. Not sure what that means, but I thought it might mean something to you guys.

 

[Mr.Herbert]

I had a guy message me on youtube a couple of weeks ago saying SuperLogicalThinker = Brian Good.. Not sure what that means, but I thought it might mean something to you guys.

http://www.truthjihad.com/good.htm

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

I'm interested if this poster will return.

For a laff I sent him a PM to ask if he was coming back to participate.

The response, so far,

 

[Firestone]

How true.

In many cases, there is a 6)
6) "Fence sitter" is banned as sockpuppet of a previous "Fence sitter".

A very recent case:

Liberty (the forum member, not the principle) has been banned as a sockpuppet of a previously banned member (Malmoesoldier).

(Pithy LashL )

You are correct, and I even allude to it in my sig. Thanks for the addition, since I should have added it.

Funny sig, but again, so saddly true.

 

[BaaBaa]

The scary part is that an F18 has two engines meaning its the same size as a 767!

And an F-18 has the same number of engines as a B-25, so it couldn't possibly break the sound barrier!

 

[plague311]

I had a guy message me on youtube a couple of weeks ago saying SuperLogicalThinker = Brian Good.. Not sure what that means, but I thought it might mean something to you guys.

Brian Good is a cross dressing individual really popular at SLC as stated above. He's fairly entertaining when you read his stuff. He gets owned on a regular over at SLC because he's a failed janitor that crossdresses, and has several sanity issues.

If you ever get board hop over there and read his comments. There aren't many restrictions so people speak a bit more...plainly over there.

 

[cjnewson88]

Brian Good is a cross dressing individual really popular at SLC as stated above. He's fairly entertaining when you read his stuff. He gets owned on a regular over at SLC because he's a failed janitor that crossdresses, and has several sanity issues.

If you ever get board hop over there and read his comments. There aren't many restrictions so people speak a bit more...plainly over there.

Can you post me a link to the forum please?

 

[plague311]

Can you post me a link to the forum please?

Here is the most recent conversation on the Screw Loose Change. Snug.bug is Brian, you'll see them address him by name. Or possibly other derogatory titles. I don't believe any can be mentioned here.

 

[KatieG]

Not a scientist, nor do I play one anywhere, but even I figured out there was a reason they crashed shortly after take off. Fully loaded with fuel, fuel burns, runs everywhere. It did seem rather strange in the beginning but emotions were running very high.

Science, it's everywhere. Ya just can't fight the science.

 

[NoahFence]

Not a scientist, nor do I play one anywhere, but even I figured out there was a reason they crashed shortly after take off. Fully loaded with fuel, fuel burns, runs everywhere. It did seem rather strange in the beginning but emotions were running very high.

Science, it's everywhere. Ya just can't fight the science.

I'll read that twenty more times and still have no idea what it says.

 

[332nd]

Not a scientist, nor do I play one anywhere, but even I figured out there was a reason they crashed shortly after take off. Fully loaded with fuel, fuel burns, runs everywhere. It did seem rather strange in the beginning but emotions were running very high.

Science, it's everywhere. Ya just can't fight the science.

Chocolope's a helluva drug.

 

[Travis]

Not a scientist, nor do I play one anywhere, but even I figured out there was a reason they crashed shortly after take off. Fully loaded with fuel, fuel burns, runs everywhere. It did seem rather strange in the beginning but emotions were running very high.

Science, it's everywhere. Ya just can't fight the science.

Of course the emotion monster is on steroids and it is pissed......as usual.

 

[SpitfireIX]

Not a scientist, nor do I play one anywhere, but even I figured out there was a reason they crashed shortly after take off. Fully loaded with fuel, fuel burns, runs everywhere. It did seem rather strange in the beginning but emotions were running very high.

Science, it's everywhere. Ya just can't fight the science.

Also significantly increases the weight of the aircraft, causing more damage from the impact, but more fuel is the main "benefit" (from the terrorists' point of view). I realized that maximum fuel on board had been the goal as soon as ABC news flashed a graphic on the screen showing that all four airliners had been scheduled to fly to California.

 

[Craig4]

If the building was believed to be brought down due to intense fuel fire that reached temperatures over the melting point of steel. Yet, it was clear that the temperature couldn't have been that intense and even if it was near that, the building wouldn't have collapsed. The proof for that is many high rise fires and most of them burned for 17+ hours, the twin towers burned for 100 minutes. Most eye witness reports indicate the presence of secondary explosions after the initial impact. Which really indicates that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, as the speed of the collapse was 10 seconds, which was exactly the same as free fall speed. Common sense should dictate that when a building collapses upon itself in such circumstances where the upper top portion of the building was burning and the lower part remained untouched, the building's collapse time would be delayed due to the resistance from a multitude of floors.

As videos show, the collapse looked too smooth, and the fact that secondary explosions were present (as previously stated) really points to the fact that controlled demolition had taken place. The building had also been designed to withstand SEVERAL hits from a Boeing 707, which is a considerably larger plane with 4 engines instead of 2 engines on the 767's that hit the twin towers, and the towers would withstand speeds of up to 600 miles per hour, whereas the 767's were moving at the speed of 450.

Truly, truthers just aren't important.

 

[jaydeehess]

wow after just a few words into the OP it was amazing the number of wrong assumptions he made. Truly astounding idiocy and the only other like minded soul to respond in this thread does not even bother adressing the OP.

 

[twinstead]

At first I was upset that that19guy didn't bother supporting his points, but then I realized that they're not HIS points; it's just the stuff some other people told him are his points

 

[Brass]

At first I was upset that that19guy didn't bother supporting his points, but then I realized that they're not HIS points; it's just the stuff some other people told him are his points

But you're the tool for believing what people tell you. Remember that!

 

[jaydeehess]

But you're the tool for believing what people tell you. Remember that!

True, I believed my physics professors.
I believe people like Bazant.
I believe people with demonstrated expertise in subjects relevant to a discussion.
I do not believe necessarily people who's expertise is barely relevant(or completely irrellevant) to a topic of discussion or who can easily be seen to be ignoring evidence contrary to their contentions.