Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

[Christopher7]

Isn't it strange how he's so precise some times and maddeningly vague others?

Do you? I think not.

You're not proposing a 'state of the art' technique, you're proposing a type of demolition that was completely unprecedented, has never been repeated, and no Truther in ten years has been able to come up with a plausible and comprehensive theory for.

I'm looking at the evidence which only controlled demolition using one or more types of thermite can explain.

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

 

[DGM]

I'm looking at the evidence which only controlled demolition using one or more types of thermite can explain.

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

Or, fires and gravity....................whichever floats your boat.

 

[NoahFence]

I'm looking at the evidence which only controlled demolition using one or more types of thermite can explain.

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

Sure you are.
*Pats chris on the head*

Sure you are.

You're bailing because you've been asked questions, and the answers you know ruin your lies.

Since this is a method of controlled demolition that has never taken place before, or since, how can you say "only" thermite can explain?

Nobody has ever taken down a building of any size using thermite - yet its as obvious as the nose on your face that they^TM used thermite?

Lies.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

They log you out after 5 or 10 minutes with no activity. Other than that the only problem i have is with the JREFers themselves.

My thermite theories?

I'm just calling 'em as I see 'em. There was molten steel/iron in the debris pile. The folks here deny that but that's just what they do. The NYPD Museum has a gun encased in concrete that melted and flowed around everything in it's path. Iron melted and lead vaporized.

What we have here is a preponderance of evidence for temperatures far in excess of what office fires can attain, local denial notwithstanding.

And since you are not an expert witness.....how you see em is irrelevant.
You are simply wrong about the molten steel (and even if you were right you couldn't prove it in a court of law) and the "molten concrete" is just laughable, its just a silly mistake made by someone as ignorant as you (well maybe not that ignorant but you know what I mean....)

 

[000063]

I'm looking at the evidence which only controlled demolition using one or more types of thermite can explain.

No, you're cherry-picking evidence to support your theory, ignoring contrary evidence (such as the time it would take for thermite to cut through steel, the plumes of smoke and flame and sparks, and the lack of knowledge of the properties of nano-thermite, which is basically Unobtanium for Truthers) showing it to people, and tipping over the chessboard when they don't agree with you. For what, five years now?

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

Feel free. Your post is not actually a response to even a single point I've made.

 

[Oystein]

I'm looking at the evidence which only controlled demolition using one or more types of thermite can explain.

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

Highlighted the part that you need to work on.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

He makes a good case for lead as the falling metal.

ETA: If he is correct then NIST was lying about it being aluminum.

Are you confusing being mistaken for lying? Do you know the difference? If you don't then you have been "lying" in almost every post

 

[Oystein]

You sound like a two year old. A never ending stream of questions.

Report or put on ignore? Hmm hmm....


Goodbye, C7!

 

[sheeplesnshills]

When the trade center towers burned and collapsed, tons of concrete, glass, furniture, carpets, insulation, computers and paper were reduced to enormous, oxygen-poor debris piles that slowly burned until Dec. 19, 2001.
http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC.htm


Actually, it was the molten metal that kept the "fires" burning.

Not possible, there was no large "ingot" of previously molten metal found.
Glad however to see you have concede it was "metal" not "steel". You are learning.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Considering the extreme temperatures that vaporized lead during the collapse.

Therefore implying that said "extreme" (you never did say what "extreme" was) temps were also expected.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

What it the thermite were IN the columns?

There would be a lot of very strange looking columns in the debris. There were none.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

It doesn't get into places that require excess pressure to force it in, and the amount of lead in the air was miniscule.

So where did they get samples from that were STILL hermetically sealed AFTER the event...........and 90 days of "miniscule" adds up......

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Do you know everything there is to know about thermite, nano-thermite and state of the art demolition techniques?

Do you? This is just an appeal to magic.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

It has been the biggest coverup in history. And the evidence has been seen.

and yet you can produce none that would stand up for a minute in any court. Why is that?.....could it be that you are simply Mistaken (or lying).

 

[LSSBB]

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

Insults notwithstanding, which are uncalled for even if richly deserved, no blaze of glory with this departure, only a fizzle, and maybe a faint "pop".

 

[sheeplesnshills]

You sound like a two year old. A never ending stream of questions.

That how they learn, you should try it!...... and if you stop making baseless assertions then we can stop asking questions...

 

[sheeplesnshills]

I'm looking at the evidence which only controlled demolition using one or more types of thermite can explain.

Enjoy your insult fest, I'm going to leave for a while.

Run away little boy.....

 

[chrismohr]

Re Chris7: Let's give credit where credit is due. Only C7 noticed the mistake in the Chinese paper; I certainly didn't, and neither did anyone else. He's got an eagle eye and kudos to him for that.

 

[NoahFence]

Re Chris7: Let's give credit where credit is due. Only C7 noticed the mistake in the Chinese paper; I certainly didn't, and neither did anyone else. He's got an eagle eye and kudos to him for that.

eh?

He'll get no credit from me. He openly mocks the deaths of 3,000 people for his own personal hobby. Its sickening, vile and obscene. I'm not going to give a known liar any leeway because he found some irrelevant tidbit in a newspaper nobody has ever heard of.

 

[BasqueArch]

Re Chris7: Let's give credit where credit is due. Only C7 noticed the mistake in the Chinese paper; I certainly didn't, and neither did anyone else. He's got an eagle eye and kudos to him for that.

Eagle Eye miss Harrit same mistake.
Eagle Mouth silent until German Bee speak.