Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

NoahFence said:
Answer this.

How did the explosives survive the impact and fireball, and remain useful an hour later?

All your mumbo jumbo about spheres is IRRELEVANT.

What's more? You know it.
Click to expand...


Sometimes I wish this forum had an 'answer the question!' rule...
 
Christopher7 said:
Not so. The extreme temperatures that melted iron and vaporized lead have only one explanation. Y'all have speculated but have yet to produce any evidence to explain why "iron melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles." or "The presence of lead oxide on the surface of mineral wool indicate the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse[FONT=&quot]"[/FONT]
Click to expand...

So if there was only you utterly insane explanation why did RJ Lee say they were expected? Are you saying RJ Lee were in on it too????? and dumb enough to include data in their report that proved your case as well.........
 
NoahFence said:
Answer this.

How did the explosives survive the impact and fireball, and remain useful an hour later?

All your mumbo jumbo about spheres is IRRELEVANT.

What's more? You know it.
Click to expand...
Oh ye of one sided imagination. What it the thermite were IN the columns?
 
Oh ye of one sided imagination. What it the thermite were IN the columns?
Click to expand...

You'll just be a good troll and continue to invent "what if's" no matter what explanation is given.

Suffice to say the entire builidng shook like it was in an earthquake, and they would have been shook loose, or incinerated like anything else in the path of that fireball.

It's 100% fantasy that anything could have survived in those conditions. ESPECIALLY explosives for chrissake.
 
Christopher7 said:
So your position is:
As the office contents burned the trace amounts of iron in them formed into microspheres and fell to the floor, despite the air turbulence and updraft that carried other particulates away as smoke?

I offer the iron microspheres in the stack of the solid waste incinerator as evidence that they would be carried away in the smoke.

What evidence do you have that these iron microspheres fell to the floor while air was rapidly rising and smoke was pouring out of the building?
Click to expand...

who said they had to fall to the floor? They would stick to anything the smoke touched and smoke got into many parts of the building. Furthermore you never showed that many did not simply remain with the ash. The ash then got blasted out with the rest of the dust in the collapse.

And how do you justify that with the argument that the breeze carried iron microspheres to the bank building?
Click to expand...

How do you justify saying it didn't? Smoke gets everywhere air can flow. And the smoke was there for 90 plus days
 
DGM said:
Good thing no one looked at any of the steel, they might of seen evidence of the hundreds of tons of "therm?te".

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Indeed.

Chris7 seems to forget that this was the single most investigated event in US (world?) history.

The evidence would have been seen.
 
NoahFence said:
Suffice to say the entire builidng shook like it was in an earthquake, and they would have been shook loose, or incinerated like anything else in the path of that fireball.

It's 100% fantasy that anything could have survived in those conditions. ESPECIALLY explosives for chrissake.
Click to expand...
Do you know everything there is to know about thermite, nano-thermite and state of the art demolition techniques?
 
Christopher7 said:
Oh ye of one sided imagination. What it the thermite were IN the columns?
Click to expand...
Do you think it is at all possible that significant amounts were in the perimeter columns? I think we would have seen the extremely bright light if burning thermite had made it out of the perimeter columns.

Christopher7 said:
Considering the extreme temperatures that vaporized lead during the collapse.
Click to expand...
I think we established that RJ Lee thinks most of the cooked-off lead was in the computers.

How could thermite inside the columns have cooked of lead in the open offices? You hopefully are aware that thermite, while able to reach extreme temperatures locally for a very short time, contains surprisingly little heat (energy) and could therefore not project that temperature over serious distances or for long enough time to melt columns AND vaporize computers?
 
Christopher7 said:
Do you know everything there is to know about thermite, nano-thermite and state of the art demolition techniques?
Click to expand...

There is no way humanly possible that explosives survived that impact.

None.

All your theories are bunk in light of that fact. Sorry, Chris. You need a new hobby. Your failure to even address this makes it quite obvious that you know it as well as I.
 
Oystein said:
Do you think it is at all possible that significant amounts were in the perimeter columns? I think we would have seen the extremely bright light if burning thermite had made it out of the perimeter columns.

I think we established that RJ Lee thinks most of the cooked-off lead was in the computers.

How could thermite inside the columns have cooked of lead in the open offices? You hopefully are aware that thermite, while able to reach extreme temperatures locally for a very short time, contains surprisingly little heat (energy) and could therefore not project that temperature over serious distances or for long enough time to melt columns AND vaporize computers?
Click to expand...
You sound like a two year old. A never ending stream of questions. :rolleyes:
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Can you clarify what you mean by "vast majority" and how did you come to that figure?
Click to expand...
Isn't it strange how he's so precise some times and maddeningly vague others?

Christopher7 said:
Do you know everything there is to know about thermite, nano-thermite and state of the art demolition techniques?
Click to expand...
Do you? I think not.

You're not proposing a 'state of the art' technique, you're proposing a type of demolition that was completely unprecedented, has never been repeated, and no Truther in ten years has been able to come up with a plausible and comprehensive theory for.
 
Christopher7 said:
It has been the biggest coverup in history. And the evidence has been seen.
Click to expand...

Why is it so damn hard to tell perfect strangers that you're wrong?!?

If you're actually going to sit there and tell me that everybody on site was somehow paid off to keep quiet about finding evidence of therm*te, I'm going to seriously suggest you get help. Living your life mired in some paranoid delusion isn't going to go away on its own.

You need to settle down, take a nice long drag off a smoke, and think about the vast numbers of people who would need to be involved. It would number in the thousands. And not a one - NOT A SINGLE ONE has come forward.

Why?

Because it's how it went down. Explosives don't survive aircraft impacts or fireballs. Fire Department chiefs do NOT send their subordinates into places they know ahead of time are going to kill them. Teams of ninjas do not plant tons of explosives in the largest buildings in the largest city with nobody noticing.

FIND HELP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom