tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
Seriously though, what is being gained from this thread?
Legaltainment, it's right there in the title.
Seriously though, what is being gained from this thread?
Ok, finally.
Hopefully we can end this thread here and focus on more productive threads?
Seriously though, what is being gained from this thread?
?????
You seem to be trying to answer my question about this thread by asking an irrelivant question back. The question is quite simple.
Either answer the question, or explain why you just said that to me.
You've done the same, I am talking about this thread. You said "these threads", implying a far wider (and unspecified) scope than this particular thread.
So, reading about child molestation gives you both giggles?
This is doubly amuzing, you've just pointed out that indeed they are fallacies, which is the very point I was making about this thread.
Yes I agree, this thread is fallacious, as is my post, which was the point![]()
You sure are posting a lot in a thread you should probably just ignore. Are you concerned?Third time lucky, maybe someone will answer this eventually.
The premise of this thread is that we will be entertained by yet another truther who finds himself in legal trouble, there is nothing fallacious about it.
You sure are posting a lot in a thread you should probably just ignore. Are you concerned?
[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/ConcernTrollisConcerned.jpg[/qimg]
Seriously though, what is being gained from this thread?
You seem to be trying to answer my question about this thread by asking an irrelivant question back. The question is quite simple.
Either answer the question, or explain why you just said that to me.
Because everything about "truthism" is irrelevant?You question is irrelevant so why do you complain about my irrelevant reply?
I guess thats the difference, I don't find this case entertaining like you do, I find it quite sickening that things like this happen at all; and thats irrespective of whatever stereotype you choose to label the person with.
You find it sickening that someone accused of child molestation has to go to court many, many times and faces serious punishment?![]()
You find it sickening that someone accused of child molestation has to go to court many, many times and faces serious punishment?![]()
I think the idea that he's trying to communicate is the he finds child molestation sickening, as if the rest of us don't.
Or he finds it sickening that child molesters are labeled truthers.
Just saying that I dont find this situation as "entertaining" as other people have said they do.
More that the labelling of any child molester to a particular stereotype/group is unrepresentative and misleading, unless the group in question is the motivation for the crime. Any one paedophile could be linked to any arbitrary subjective group, but the link is mere co-incidence; unless the group has influenced the crime, such as Vatican priests. I don't think people would argue that the influence of truthers and researching 9/11 conspiracy theories on this person was an influence in the crime they committed.
You'll find criminals like this in every flavor of group worldwide.
I don't think people would argue that the influence of truthers and researching 9/11 conspiracy theories on this person was an influence in the crime they committed.
Don't you think it's important to show the TRUTH?
I think it's a reflection on a person's logic and decision making.
Zeuzzz I'm with you. This is a pathetic thread. I read it with a little embarrassment, like looking at a car accident.
I guess thats the difference, I don't find this case entertaining like you do, I find it quite sickening that things like this happen at all; and thats irrespective of whatever stereotype you choose to label the person with.
You find it sickening that a lying, hypocritical douchebag is going to be sent to jail?