Merged Jestblaze's Thoughts

[Almo]

just another off the wall post but if it's impossible to reach true abolute zero kelvin shouldn't there be an equation that tells you Absolute Velocity in reference to the universe?
Maybe :
Lowest achievable temperature in kelvin * a constant<maybe C> = absolute universal velocity

No. I recommend learning some real physics before wasting your time with this nonsense. Real physics is fascinating, and more importantly, it works.

 

[Ziggurat]

Today's expansion on this theory turns to centrifugal motion and how it effects lowest reachable K. As the world turns it moves with and aganist absolute speed<this is where you comment speed doesn't have a direction> so there should be an oscillation in the lowest temperature reachable.

This is complete nonsense. Temperature isn't about speed, it's about entropy. Nothing about a rotating reference frame changes entropy.

I admit I am not a formally trained physicist.

That's pretty obvious.

I'm a chef, it's just as good but I am a ponderer. I hope if there are physicists on this site they use my ideas to form a good solid theory. Let's work together.

There's nothing to work on. You don't even know what temperature is. I don't mean that as an insult, most people don't know. The actual definition is pretty subtle, particularly in regards to how it differs from the popular conception, but there are damn good reasons that temperature is defined the way it is and not the way you think it is. But until you learn how temperature is actually defined, all your speculation is going to be nonsense.

 

[jestblaze]

Here are some things I've thought I've discussed telepathically which i now believe was only subconscious.

The age defying enzyme can only be synthesized if it is made with a lipid membrane enclosing the two alkalinities of the enyzme and protein
The LMC's around the world need to collaborate better and start using ribosomal based energy sources for bionanotechnologies
More when i think of it.

 

[Pixel42]

More when i think of it.

Why?

 

[Stray Cat]

Here are some things I've thought I've discussed telepathically which i now believe was only subconscious.

The age defying enzyme can only be synthesized if it is made with a lipid membrane enclosing the two alkalinities of the enyzme and protein
The LMC's around the world need to collaborate better and start using ribosomal based energy sources for bionanotechnologies
More when i think of it.

And is there anything else that you know next to nothing about that you'd like to teach us?

 

[dafydd]

There's nothing to work on. You don't even know what temperature is. I don't mean that as an insult, most people don't know.

Am I right in thinking that a cup of boiling water may be at a higher temperature than a bath full of tepid water, but the bath contains more heat than the cup of water?

 

[Complexity]

Here are some things I've thought I've discussed telepathically which i now believe was only subconscious.

The age defying enzyme can only be synthesized if it is made with a lipid membrane enclosing the two alkalinities of the enyzme and protein
The LMC's around the world need to collaborate better and start using ribosomal based energy sources for bionanotechnologies
More when i think of it.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Our a posteriori concepts are a representation of the phenomena, yet our judgements constitute the whole content for metaphysics. Let us suppose that our judgements are what first give rise to our ideas, by means of analysis. There can be no doubt that time depends on the noumena. By virtue of my free epoche with respect to the being of the experienced world, the momentous fact is that we must not let ourselves be frightened by considerations of the phenomenological epoche and cogitationes. Our sense perceptions are the clue to the discovery of our sense perceptions; for these quantums, the employment of our faculties would thereby be made to contradict, so far as I know, the transcendental unity of apperception. The employment of our judgements would thereby be made to contradict the manifold. (The Transcendental Deduction is the clue to the discovery of, consequently, the noumena; in natural theology, our a priori concepts are the mere results of the power of space, a blind but indispensable function of the soul) Since knowledge of natural tesseracts is a posteriori, the transcendental aesthetic has lying before it the noumena, but the phenomena have lying before them the manifold. (We now shift the weight of transcendental evidence of the ego cogito (in the attitude established by transcendental reduction) from the ego to experiences) Hence it follows without more ado that the fundamental form of this universal synthesis (in the broadest sense) is precisely what makes critical decisions about separated modes of consciousness at all possible by the fundamental nature of cogitations.. The Categories, in respect of the intelligible character, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the Ideal of human quantum, they exclude the possibility of a posteriori principles, yet the Antinomies are the clue to the discovery of, in particular, the Antinomies. As will easily be shown in the next section, the Transcendental Deduction (and we can deduce that this is true) stands in need of our sense perceptions. The Ideal of pure quantum proves the validity of the Antinomies, as we have already seen. The phenomenological Ego, mediately, stands in contrast to the accidental being "for me" of noematic descriptions; I, the meditating phenomenologist, set myself the all-embracing task of uncovering experiences by conscious conversion into the corresponding experiences. The practical employment of the Antinomies is the key to understanding time, and philosophy is the clue to the discovery of the paralogisms of human quantum.

Hans

Aw, you beat me to it.

 

[jestblaze]

I have one proven ability. I can waver the volume and sometimes cancel out a test tone at 14000hz. This seems minor except for I discussed channelling my ability to one frind of mine and he is not telepathic at all. He now has enough practice using his method to channel me and can perform my ability as well as me at test distances where I was up to and slightly over 15 miles away. Your welcome to figure it out and give it a try.

 

[Stray Cat]

I have one proven ability.

The abilty to post nonsense on the internet?

We've got plenty of evidence (and still accumulating) to support it.

 

[jestblaze]

sample tone for practice 30 sec www.everyonevotes.us/ringtone.mp3

Also I don't want to start a thread for this but wouldn't it be cool to have a matrix of lasers in space designed to melt sand subteraneously so we could spend our days digging big glass structures out of deserts you know like a glass house or something

 

[Verde]

For some reason I thought it meant petty criminal. The actual definition would be more of a violent criminal: a thug or ruffian. On the other hand, British slang allows of a definition of dupe, fool, or gullible person. So let's say I was going for that definition.

Oh yes, I am aware of the alternate uses of the word, but the way the thread was going I thought a bit of jolly banter may be appropriate.

V.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I have one proven ability. I can waver the volume and sometimes cancel out a test tone at 14000hz.

If you can prove that, you can win a million dollars. Please explain your methodology so we can work out a protocol.

 

[Stray Cat]

Also I don't want to start a thread for this but wouldn't it be cool to have a matrix of lasers in space designed to melt sand subteraneously so we could spend our days digging big glass structures out of deserts you know like a glass house or something

Or a pocket sized machine that turned stones into candy floss and water into petrol...


... That'd be even cooler.

 

[Ziggurat]

Am I right in thinking that a cup of boiling water may be at a higher temperature than a bath full of tepid water

Yes.

but the bath contains more heat than the cup of water?

To be precise, the bath has more thermal energy. Heat, in thermodynamics, is specifically transferred thermal energy, so a bath by itself doesn't actually have any heat at all. This is different from the non-technical definition of heat, but the distinction can be important when discussing thermodynamics, since mixing the two definitions can cause confusion.

But my statement regarding the distinction between energy and temperature is actually more fundamental than your example. Although the teacup has less thermal energy than the bathtub, it still has more thermal energy per unit mass (or per unit mole) than the bathtub. And in fact, for many systems, the energy per mass, or per mole, will actually scale linearly with temperature over a wide range of temperatures. This result is known as the equipartition theorem, and liquid water obeys the equipartition theorem pretty well. In practice, this is equivalent to saying that many objects have constant heat capacities, but some objects have varying heat capacities (actually, all objects necessarily do, if you get cold enough).

But some people mistakenly take the equipartition theorem as the definition of temperature, rather than a common (but definitely not universal) result of the way temperature is actually defined, which is in terms of entropy, not energy. Trying to define energy by the equipartition theorem leads to serious problems. In particular, under that definition of temperature, some objects can be at thermal equilibrium with each other but have different temperatures. And that defeats the whole point of defining temperature in the first place, namely, that objects in thermal equilibrium will necessarily be at the same temperature. The real definition of temperature avoids this problem, and guarantees that thermal equilibrium means equal temperature.

 

[oody]

I have one proven ability. I can waver the volume and sometimes cancel out a test tone at 14000hz. This seems minor except for I discussed channelling my ability to one frind of mine and he is not telepathic at all. He now has enough practice using his method to channel me and can perform my ability as well as me at test distances where I was up to and slightly over 15 miles away. Your welcome to figure it out and give it a try.

Learn a little Morse code and you can use this 'volume wavering' to send information 15 miles away to your friend. I.e. a series of dice roll results. Work this up until you can do this dependably, and you've got something. I'm a little late to your threads, but are you applying for the million dollar challenge with your 'proven ability' to controllably modulate the 'volume' of a test signal with your mind?

 

[Ladewig]

Oh yes, I am aware of the alternate uses of the word, but the way the thread was going I thought a bit of jolly banter may be appropriate.

V.

Well, if that's your attitude, then I demand that you give this thread the level of respect that it deserves.



In vaudeville, the guy who told the straight lines usually got paid more than the guy who told the jokes because everyone wanted to tell the jokes.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

If you can prove that, you can win a million dollars. Please explain your methodology so we can work out a protocol.

Actually, never mind, let's just come up with a protocol and you can say what you think of it.

You claim you can do this up to 15 miles away. Or, at least, you claim that your friend can and that your friend is as good at this as you are. So I'm assuming that you can do this at a distance.

Seems an easy test. Contact your local sceptic's group, or any group which has a cash prize for proving a paranormal ability. Contact your local recording studio and ensure they have a sound-proof room, a reliable tone generator, a good PA either in the sound-proof room or which can be moved in to the sound-proof room, and a dB meter. If it only has some of these things, try to source the others from local sound and lighting companies.

Set up the PA in the sound-proof room and put the dB meter somewhere in the room where it's readout can be seen from outside the room. Connect the tone generator to the PA and switch the whole lot on. Ensure the output from the tone generator is loud enough that the dB meter registers at an unmistakeable level, say, 70dB. Leave the room, shutting the door behind you.

You and the sceptic observer remain outside the room, watching the dB meter. You make the volume of the tone drop, you and the observer see this on the dB meter. The observer congratulates you and hands you a cheque.

Now you've won one sceptic challenge and become the first person ever to successfully do so, the JREF will be interested in setting up their own test. You pass that, you win $1,000,000.

You might have to pay out a little initially for the hire of the recording studio and equipment, but don't think of it as spending money, think of it as initial outlay on a $1m investment. If you truly believe that you can do what you claim, and that you can prove it, then you've got nothing to lose.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Learn a little Morse code and you can use this 'volume wavering' to send information 15 miles away to your friend. I.e. a series of dice roll results. Work this up until you can do this dependably, and you've got something.

No need to do that. A change in volume can be measured very reliably. It's an incredibly easy claim to test objectively.

 

[oody]

No need to do that. A change in volume can be measured very reliably. It's an incredibly easy claim to test objectively.

True, if his claim is to be able to modulate plain old radio waves. I guess I'm jumping ahead prematurely to the next step where our telepath learns that these are some new kind of wave undetectable by mere instruments. If so, we're still in the Marconi days of this biological radiotelephony.