Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

[Brass]

Here's a simple question for the twoofers;

If Larry Silverstein has so much power and control over everything, including power to pull of these scheme, then why doesn't he have the power to edit out his "slip" of saying "pull it" from appearing in the final video?

I'll sit here, not worrying about little black helicopters following me everyday while you guys ponder over that.

 

[Edx]

Here's a simple question for the twoofers;

If Larry Silverstein has so much power and control over everything, including power to pull of these scheme, then why doesn't he have the power to edit out his "slip" of saying "pull it" from appearing in the final video?

I'll sit here, not worrying about little black helicopters following me everyday while you guys ponder over that.

Because it wasnt a slip, Silverstein cant help blab the whole FDNY demolition conspiracy to the whole world.

 

[plague311]

Here's a simple question for the twoofers;

If Larry Silverstein has so much power and control over everything, including power to pull of these scheme, then why doesn't he have the power to edit out his "slip" of saying "pull it" from appearing in the final video?

I'll sit here, not worrying about little black helicopters following me everyday while you guys ponder over that.

And on that same note, if he's got the ultimate power how come he didn't use it to get higher pay outs from the insurance companies?

 

[The Platypus]

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." –Larry Silverstein

So Larry, 5 years later, in an interview on a PBS documentary recalled that he told the fire commander that he thought the best thing to do is "pull" back because the fire commander said that they weren't going to be able to contain the fire. And somehow the paranoid 911 CTs spin doctor and distort this into an admission of demolition and inside job out of that... Wow...

And then they say that we need "agents" and the media to convince us into thinking that they are kooks spewing BS... Wow again...

 

[Travis]

According to his own account, he was speaking directly to a fire commander. So I guess the fire commander also didn't know what was going on. So many people, so confused. Fog of war and everything.

Who said the fire commander didn't know what was going on. He was just calling Larry up to let him know his building was probably toast.

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

It's so very clear. A decision needed to be made about whether to pull personnel away from the area outside the building where they were trying to stop the fire with the power of their minds.

I see someone forgets that they had made WTC7 a rally point earlier in the day. There were a lot of things that need to be "pulled back" even though no fire fighting was going on.

Then, at Larry the property developer's timely suggestion, they decided they would pull their personnel back. They pulled "it". Then they watched the building collapse three hours later.

What's not to understand?

Apparently much. It was never Larry's suggestion. The fire department decided to stop their efforts themselves. They called Larry to let him know that. Years later he puts a spin on this that makes him sound more actively involved than he was.

 

[000063]

Hey,..... Here's a real ten dollar bet for you. If someone was to drop this into ATS or Infowars, it would be taken seriously. Within the year, we'd be seeing it on chain emails and some drooling halfwit would be in Auckland or Toronto or Stockholm handing out copies of it to show the sheeple The Truth^TM

I have an ATS account.

Must...not...troll...

 

[RedIbis]

Years later he puts a spin on this that makes him sound more actively involved than he was.

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters. Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

 

[NoahFence]

He made no bizarre comments. Only benign comments misinterpreted by bizarre people.

 

[000063]

...
3) You would have to win some form of award for planting explosives in the building while it's on fire and about to go down...

This really is the sticking point, for me.

Either the explosives were in there already--and worked perfectly even after the building was on fire for several hours--or they were planted after the building got hit, which would be physically impossible to do in that timeframe, even without all the fire.

Some Truthers have posited that they were in there intended for a plane crash, but there was no reason for "terrorists" to hit the building, and the only unaccounted-for plane was the one in Shanksville, which crashed shortly after 7 was hit by debris.

In addition, explosives positioned to simulate a collapse that was the ultimate result of a plane crash would produce drastically different results from a collapse that was the ultimate result of debris falling on it.

Because it doesn't fit their agenda. Like I've said before, "twoofers" venture into an area where they don't accept tangible evidence. Why don't they accept this evidence? Because it disproves their ideas. It's also hard to shallow your pride and admit you're wrong, which "twoofers" refuse to do.

And next time someone tries to make the claim that "patriots" like Alex Jones are doing the right thing by exposing the people "behind 9/11", ask that person why Alex Jones believes the FDNY is guilty of manslaughter, and thus, obviously "in" on the whole operation.

That is one of the most disgusting bits of the whole affair, to me. Truther theories usually, by implication, accuse firefighters of culpability in the murders of thousands of people and hundreds of their colleagues, but they don't like to answer the question of whether the FDNY was involved, even when their assertion, like in this whole "pull it" case, all but states that directly.

 

[NoahFence]

How many people he cared about did Silverstein lose? And you twisted, ignorant people think he was involved? How do you sleep?

 

[000063]

Agreed. Something's clearly not kosher.

Ohohoho! Argument by 'witty' one liner! A clever tactic!

I gotta tell you, when you need an argument from ignorance and incredulity, ergo has GOT to be your go to guy.

Plus indirect personal attacks. I'm surprised he didn't manage to sneak one into the post in question.

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters. Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

He said that he suggested it was a good idea to pull out of the building. Then he said that the FDNY made the decision to pull it. There's a difference between a lie and spin. A lie, for instance, would be saying Larry "made out like a bandit", unless the person honestly believed that was the case. Of course, if corrected, and they refuse to admit they are wrong, then they're lying.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Here's a simple question for the twoofers;

If Larry Silverstein has so much power and control over everything, including power to pull of these scheme, then why doesn't he have the power to edit out his "slip" of saying "pull it" from appearing in the final video?

Oh! I know this one... Arrogance. Yes, Larry Silverstein's "pull it" was a middle finger to the entire world, because he knew he could get away with it. Of course, that begs another question: If he could outright admit to the fraud and get away with it, why the need for a coverup?

On another note, whenever truthers talk about Larry Silverstein and his "pull it" quote, it always has this weird feeling of being completely separate from everything else that happened on that day. As if 9/11 occurred, Mr. Silverstein decided to take advantage of it to commit insurance fraud, and that proving this fraud somehow proves 9/11 itself to be a fraud. Huh?

 

[Clayton Moore]

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters. Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

contortions
contortionor
contortioning
contortive

That seems to be SOP of those who attempt to debunk the truth about 9/11.

 

[RedIbis]

Ohohoho! Argument by 'witty' one liner! A clever tactic!

Thank you. I have my moments.

 

[000063]

None of them, apparently, involve explaining how Larry "made out like a bandit".

 

[aggle-rithm]

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters. Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

Come on. Take a step back and look at the big picture. Do you SERIOUSLY believe this crap?

I can understand some of the lower-intelligence truthers falling for this, as they lack the wit to comprehend the inherent contradictions in their own arguments. I would expect better from someone like you.

 

[The Big Dog]

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters. Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

No Red, you see most of us are familiar with Nigro's statement, and also know that the fact that anyone thinks that Larry Silverstein told the FDNY to demolish wtc7 is laughably stupid

 

[Clayton Moore]

Oh! I know this one... Arrogance. Yes, Larry Silverstein's "pull it" was a middle finger to the entire world, because he knew he could get away with it. Of course, that begs another question: If he could outright admit to the fraud and get away with it, why the need for a coverup?

On another note, whenever truthers talk about Larry Silverstein and his "pull it" quote, it always has this weird feeling of being completely separate from everything else that happened on that day. As if 9/11 occurred, Mr. Silverstein decided to take advantage of it to commit insurance fraud, and that proving this fraud somehow proves 9/11 itself to be a fraud. Huh?

Actually Larry had ironed out most of the wrinkles before he and his children skipped their usual breakfast on 9/11 at the Tower restaurant.

 

[WildCat]

Come on. Take a step back and look at the big picture. Do you SERIOUSLY believe this crap?

I can understand some of the lower-intelligence truthers falling for this, as they lack the wit to comprehend the inherent contradictions in their own arguments. I would expect better from someone like you.

Mental illness can strike anyone.

 

[Edx]

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters.

Yes, IT. The rescue efforts going on around WTC7. You're the one that apparently sees no danger of being near a 47 story building that collapses unless you're inside it.

Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

Larry said "THEY" (the FDNY) MADE THE DECISION. Apparently in your world it means... "I SAID BLOW UP MA BUILDING CHIEF, I WANT THAT THAR INSURANCE MONEY!!!!"

Now, since you've ignored the previous point I'll ask you again. Would you want to be around a 47 story building that you thought was going to collapse?

And once again., You want us to believe instead that Larry casually admitted, in a pre-recorded documentary, to fraud and conspiracy with the FDNY to rig WTC7 in a few hours with super secret nano thermite to demolish a building in a way never used before or since without anyone noticing.