• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

RedIbis said:
Pulling the firefighters out of what? It's been explained ad nauseum that there was no firefighting operation in 7.
Click to expand...

Just because there was no firefighting in 7 doesnt mean they didnt pull everyone out of that area due to them thinking the building was probably going to collapse. That is what the FDNY's fire chief Daniel Nigro and dozens of firefighters said happened with no hint of disagreement from any of them anywhere. So if you require there to be no reason to create a collapse zone you have to be saying the entire FDNY are in on it as well.

As I have asked before, truthers require him to have casually admitted fraud and conspiracy with the FDNY to rig WTC7 in a few hours with super secret nano thermite to demolish a building in a way never used before or since without anyone noticing in a pre-recorded documentary.
 
RedIbis said:
That's not saying much, but holy crap that post looks like a tremendous waste of time.
Click to expand...

And just WTF have you been doing for the last... ten... years?

Have you found the evidence that Silverstein "made out like a bandit" yet? Or of your assertions of FDNY involvement in the conspiracy?
 
RedIbis said:
Pulling the firefighters out of what? It's been explained ad nauseum that there was no firefighting operation in 7.
Click to expand...

The... area... around... the... building.

9/11 twoofers are just ******* stupid.

Edited by jhunter1163: 
To properly mask profanity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sword_Of_Truth said:
The... area... around... the... building.

9/11 twoofers are just ******* stupid.
Click to expand...

Apparently truthers cant see a reason why you'd want to make sure no one is an area where a 47 story building is in danger of collapse :rolleyes::D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
grandmastershek said:
Duh...because it fell perfectly in its own footprint. No danger at all.
Click to expand...


Since we know Silverstien was one of the perps he knew there it was going to fall in it's own footprint so he can only mean blow up the building when he ordered them to pull it.:boggled:


Or maybe he was ordering chicken for lunch.
 
grandmastershek said:
Duh...because it fell perfectly in its own footprint. No danger at all.
Click to expand...

Whats funny is that must be literally how they think.

Its these kinds of really bizarre thought processes that somehow arent laughed at immediately at the apologiseg for saying something so stupid upon someone pointing it out to them that made me realise how utterly crazy and vacuous the truther position is.
 
RedIbis said:
Agreed. Something's clearly not kosher.
Click to expand...

You going to admit that even if people are not inside it, it does actually make sense to make sure everyone is far away from a building if its thought to be in danger of collapse?
 
Miragememories said:
"pull it" obviously meaning "pulling firefighters" since the first thing to come to Larry Silverstein's mind in that interview was to refer to the firefighters as it.

Yeah right.

MM
Click to expand...

Have you read the 9/11 Commission Report yet MM? Have you declared your incompetence with regards to what it contains and apologized for your unsourced nonsense from the other thread? Probably not, as here you are, yet again, spewing nonsense without context. I guess you are incapable of admitting you're absolutely wrong with everything related to 9/11 or you just refuse to. Which is it? Did Silverstein make billions or lose millions/billions as a result of 9/11? Are you going to continue to make ludicrous statements without any substantially sourced backing?
 
Whether there was actually any firefighting effort going on then is irrelevant to the quote because it comes from Silverstein who was likely unaware exactly what the firefighters were doing. His comment makes perfect sense if he thought there were firefighters still in the building.
 
RedIbis said:
Pulling the firefighters out of what? It's been explained ad nauseum that there was no firefighting operation in 7.
Click to expand...

But there were hundreds of firemen on the neighboring debris pile looking for survivors and we know they did fight some of the other fires in the area (the smaller buildings, cars etc.)
The people on the debris pile were pulled back (which they were not happy about)
 
Travis said:
Whether there was actually any firefighting effort going on then is irrelevant to the quote because it comes from Silverstein who was likely unaware exactly what the firefighters were doing. His comment makes perfect sense if he thought there were firefighters still in the building.
Click to expand...

They just don't get that Silverstein had no say....no say, in what was going on that day.
 
Travis said:
Whether there was actually any firefighting effort going on then is irrelevant to the quote because it comes from Silverstein who was likely unaware exactly what the firefighters were doing.
Click to expand...

According to his own account, he was speaking directly to a fire commander. So I guess the fire commander also didn't know what was going on. So many people, so confused. Fog of war and everything.

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

It's so very clear. A decision needed to be made about whether to pull personnel away from the area outside the building where they were trying to stop the fire with the power of their minds. Then, at Larry the property developer's timely suggestion, they decided they would pull their personnel back. They pulled "it". Then they watched the building collapse three hours later.

What's not to understand?
 
ergo said:
According to his own account, he was speaking directly to a fire commander. So I guess the fire commander also didn't know what was going on. So many people, so confused. Fog of war and everything.
Click to expand...

Except what Silverstein said is exactly what the FDNY had been saying all day

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

It's so very clear. A decision needed to be made about whether to pull personnel away from the area outside the building where they were trying to stop the fire with the power of their minds. Then, at Larry the property developer's timely suggestion, they decided they would pull their personnel back. They pulled "it". Then they watched the building collapse three hours later.

What's not to understand?
Click to expand...

The FDNY needed to " pull personnel away from the area outside the building" ... because they saw WTC7 was in danger of collapse so pulled their rescue and firefighting efforts away from the area and created a "collapse zone". Larry didnt have any say in the matter. It was a courtesy call.

You want us to believe instead that Larry casually admitted, in a pre-recorded documentary, to fraud and conspiracy with the FDNY to rig WTC7 in a few hours with super secret nano thermite to demolish a building in a way never used before or since without anyone noticing.

What do YOU not understand about that?
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
According to his own account, he was speaking directly to a fire commander. So I guess the fire commander also didn't know what was going on. So many people, so confused. Fog of war and everything.

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

It's so very clear. A decision needed to be made about whether to pull personnel away from the area outside the building where they were trying to stop the fire with the power of their minds. Then, at Larry the property developer's timely suggestion, they decided they would pull their personnel back. They pulled "it". Then they watched the building collapse three hours later.

What's not to understand?
Click to expand...

I gotta tell you, when you need an argument from ignorance and incredulity, ergo has GOT to be your go to guy.
 
cjnewson88 said:
If Truthers consider Larry Silverstein's 'pull-it' to be a "fact showing proof that 9/11 was an inside job" then you guys are dam desperate for proof.. I mean really scraping the bottom of the barrel if you honestly consider this proof.
Click to expand...
They are. I mean you pretty much nailed that one on the head.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom