• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

For the schmuck taken in by the con artist purporting to represent the "Dragon Family" to have to pay yet more money with no hope of recovery and further embarrass himself for our amusement?
 
Tomtomkent said:
Let's not. Why don't you post some evidence to support your assertions so we don't have to?
Click to expand...

That's also a valid assumption. I will test my assumption first though. And assume that the secret cabal rules the entire world and everything that goes on in society and the rest of us are basically clueless human resources that are manipulated into behaving in certain predictable ways through the scarcity of money etc.
 
Anders Lindman said:
That's also a valid assumption.
Click to expand...

No. it is NOT an assumption. No part of the statement is an assumption. Here, read it again:

The first part is:
Lets not.
Click to expand...
That is not an assumption, that is a direct answer. It means "Let's not assume the Dragon Family CT is real."

The next part is the important part:
Why don't you post some evidence to support your assertions so we don't have to?
Click to expand...
That is not an assumption either. It is a question. It means to ask why you do not post some evidence to support your assertions so we do not have to assume anything is real. Because if we have evidence we will know it either is, or is not.

When somebody has to point out that their post is not an assumption, nor can be in any way read as an assumption, it tends to suggest you have not bothered to read it, or are unable to rub two wits together to understand the post. Which was your problem?
 
Tomtomkent said:
No. it is NOT an assumption. No part of the statement is an assumption. Here, read it again:

The first part is:

That is not an assumption, that is a direct answer. It means "Let's not assume the Dragon Family CT is real."

The next part is the important part:

That is not an assumption either. It is a question. It means to ask why you do not post some evidence to support your assertions so we do not have to assume anything is real. Because if we have evidence we will know it either is, or is not.

When somebody has to point out that their post is not an assumption, nor can be in any way read as an assumption, it tends to suggest you have not bothered to read it, or are unable to rub two wits together to understand the post. Which was your problem?
Click to expand...

I call it an assumption. You assume my theory is false. That's valid. Because the theory is after all quite outrageous. That doesn't mean that I will change my own assumption. And let's see what evidence will come up, if any.
 
Mojo said:
It could just be the mind control making you think that. This is just further evidence that you are in fact under mind control.
Click to expand...

Even if that would be the case, would you be swayed by disinfo, or are you afraid that other people will be led astray?
 
Anders Lindman said:
My point is that you seem concerned about disinfo. A good way of dealing with disinfo is to learn how to detect it.
Click to expand...


It can easily be detected by looking at your posts.

But you're trying to change the subject again. Your question to which I was replying wasn't about detecting disinformation; it was about the potential effects of the disinformation.

Since you don't believe that you post disinformation, its potential effects can only be of limited interest to you. On the other hand your controllers in the cabal would be vitally interested in the results of their campaign. It seems more likely that the question originated with the cabal than with you.
 
Mojo said:
It can easily be detected by looking at your posts.

But you're trying to change the subject again. Your question to which I was replying wasn't about detecting disinformation; it was about the potential effects of the disinformation.

Since you don't believe that you post disinformation, its potential effects can only be of limited interest to you. On the other hand your controllers in the cabal would be vitally interested in the results of their campaign. It seems more likely that the question originated with the cabal than with you.
Click to expand...

Oh no! I think it's very important to be aware of possible disinfo. I think of all information as potentially being disinfo. So that I'm not led astray. And my suggestion is that people should be aware of disinfo and be able to detect it. In that way the disinfo loses its power.
 
Anders Lindman said:
"In a May 13, 1968 article in the Providence Evening Bulletin, [42] Estabrooks is described as a former consultant for the FBI and CIA, and is quoted as saying that, "the key to creating an effective spy or assassin rests in splitting a man's personality, or creating multipersonality, with the aid of hypnotism. This is not science fiction. This has and is being done. I have done it." P. 162" -- http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg
Click to expand...

And multiple personalities are a fraud, they do not exist.
 
Anders Lindman said:
How do you know it's well-debunked? And this is about programming an alter, not implanting childhood memories or anything like that. It's hardly possible to for example program several years of memory into a person.
Click to expand...

Because there is no evidence for alters, they are all fabrications, there is NO evidence for alters, they are fabrications. Eve was a fabrication, Sybil was a fabrication, there are NO documented cases of multiple personality disorder where alters actually exist.
 
Mojo said:
Your posting history doesn't support this assertion. The mind control must be preventing you from seeing how far astray you have been led.
Click to expand...

It's important to not get too stuck in rigid thinking. And clinging too hard to fixed beliefs can often make a person vulnerable to distractions. I too cling to some beliefs but I can quickly change my mind so I'm not so stuck in a fixed mindset.
 
Anders Lindman said:
It's important to not get too stuck in rigid thinking. And clinging too hard to fixed beliefs can often make a person vulnerable to distractions. I too cling to some beliefs but I can quickly change my mind so I'm not so stuck in a fixed mindset.
Click to expand...


Changing the subject is not the same as changing your mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom