• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Jestblaze's Thoughts

I'm seeing someone who only posts here because this is probably the only attention he gets when he speaks of these kinds of ideas. My reccommendation is to take the approach his dad did when he starts:

"Out of the way son i'm trying to watch the game"
 
Ok firstly i didn't know they already tried to create tesseractile matter secondly thank you for a HELPFUL post
I wrote this late at night when the idea just came to me I thought about how in the future we may make it stable. Steven Hawkings proposed a theory that black holes too small for a photon to pass through exist in every particle. I know that was after the Columbia experiments. Do you think it in the future this principle could allow for the stabilization of a 3 dimensional shifting true four dimensional tesseractile matter? I really know little about this and I am just trying to give some off the wall ideas that I honestly don't know if they lack scientific credibility but to everyone who posted jokes or simply bashed me <i'm thinking of a four letter word> you
 
jestblaze said:
Ok firstly i didn't know they already tried to create tesseractile matter secondly thank you for a HELPFUL post
I wrote this late at night when the idea just came to me I thought about how in the future we may make it stable. Steven Hawkings proposed a theory that black holes too small for a photon to pass through exist in every particle. I know that was after the Columbia experiments. Do you think it in the future this principle could allow for the stabilization of a 3 dimensional shifting true four dimensional tesseractile matter? I really know little about this and I am just trying to give some off the wall ideas that I honestly don't know if they lack scientific credibility but to everyone who posted jokes or simply bashed me <i'm thinking of a four letter word> you
Click to expand...

Whoosh...
 
jestblaze said:
Ok firstly i didn't know they already tried to create tesseractile matter secondly thank you for a HELPFUL post
I wrote this late at night when the idea just came to me I thought about how in the future we may make it stable. Steven Hawkings proposed a theory that black holes too small for a photon to pass through exist in every particle. I know that was after the Columbia experiments. Do you think it in the future this principle could allow for the stabilization of a 3 dimensional shifting true four dimensional tesseractile matter? I really know little about this and I am just trying to give some off the wall ideas that I honestly don't know if they lack scientific credibility but to everyone who posted jokes or simply bashed me <i'm thinking of a four letter word> you
Click to expand...

Err..... jestblaze, take a peek at this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiotimoline
 
jestblaze said:
...but to everyone who posted jokes or simply bashed me <i'm thinking of a four letter word> you
Click to expand...


'Woo' only has three letters.

'Thank' has five letters.

I'm not quite sure what you mean, but thank you for your insightful constributions.
 
Last edited:
Posting in a troll thread...

A tesseract is a 4-dimensional cube, not a state of matter. If you want to say tesseract, say tesseract. If you want to say 4-dimensional matter, say 4-dimensional matter.

There's no such thing as tesseractile matter just like there's no such thing as cubic matter.
 
Using my unfathomable powers not only have I made you raise your hand but I've wiped your memory of doing it. You puny sceptics make me laugh with your need for evidence. You are all in my power.

Or perhaps not.
 
more off the wall ideas about tesseractile atomic structure creation to make tesseractile elements
I believe if you take a radioactive element atom and lower it to 0k it still exhibits radioactive decay but shows no signs of radioactivity because 0k restricts time-space to motionlessness relative to the atom. This radiation goes somewhere. It goes into the impossibly small blackholes in the atomic structure and i hope dilates the black hole enough to pass particles through and into the black hole. Combining two radioactive elements, not sure which ones, to create what seems to be a cubic radioactive atomic structure where the black holes stay dialated and allow for tesseractile formation stable in four dimensions. You may say it goes into the black hole but why does it come out. Simple black holes work on gravity, i believe and atomic structure is held together by the greater force which trumps gravity allowing atomic shifting three dimensionally to acomadate <sp> a constant shifting cubic three dimensional form. Maybe this is all false, I'm no physicist so I'm just trying to inspire you to look at is it possible we may be able to make free energy tesseractile matter in the future. I slightly take offense to comments that I'm retarded etc please stop
 
jestblaze said:
a tesserect is a four dineminsoinal cube
Creating an element with tesseractile properties could be an eneregy source.
The only stable tesseractile atomic configuration is time dependent with parts of it hidden from standard view.
The best example of this while flawed is in the movie cube 0
Based on the elemental/tesseractic fundamentals the structure of the tesseract would be constantly changing but appear the same as with the constant C
Energy could be harvested from the stablity complex of a true tesseractila aton and it's element because part of it would become interdimentional and release energy constantly with their reshaping. I am not 100% positive on the outcome but i believe we should be making the terreractila matter as our first experiment in extradimensional energy.
Click to expand...

So you've read too much Marvel comics ?
 
jestblaze said:
Ok firstly i didn't know they already tried to create tesseractile matter secondly thank you for a HELPFUL post
Click to expand...

jestblaze, the "thiotimoline" reference, as several people have pointed out, was from a short story by Isaac Asimov ("Thiotimoline to the Stars"). Nobody has tried to create "tesseractile matter"; there is no such thing.

I wrote this late at night when the idea just came to me I thought about how in the future we may make it stable.

It doesn't exist.

Steven Hawkings proposed a theory that black holes too small for a photon to pass through exist in every particle.

No, he didn't, and that doesn't even make sense. It's like saying there's a very small pony in every amoeba.

I know that was after the Columbia experiments.

Again, there were no such experiments. That was a joke.

Do you think it in the future this principle could allow for the stabilization of a 3 dimensional shifting true four dimensional tesseractile matter?

That makes no sense whatsoever. There's no separate set of some other "four dimensional" or "tesseractile" matter. Arguments about string theory and extra dimensions are about the nature of all matter and how we observe and interact with it.

I really know little about this and I am just trying to give some off the wall ideas that I honestly don't know if they lack scientific credibility

Sorry, but nothing you said bears any resemblance to physical reality. But I commend you for your free-ranging interest.

but to everyone who posted jokes or simply bashed me <i'm thinking of a four letter word> you

Temper, temper. This isn't an academic environment, and frankly if you make wild claims people are going to have a little fun with it. Especially if you haven't invested enough effort to notice that the "HELPFUL" post was itself a joke. I'm not bashing you; that's just an observation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom