Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

[Anders Lindman]

OOooboy, have you got the wrong number...

Maybe the wrong forum. I'm out of here.

 

[JayUtah]

Maybe the wrong forum. I'm out of here.

...for the umpteenth time. Warning: fringe reset in progress.

 

[JayUtah]

Do you see the flawed logic in that statement?

I see what you think is the flawed logic. I corrected you, because the complex premise in your argument is that the receiver of the story has the burden of proof to show it was made up. I pointed out that we must instead place the burden of proof on that proposition for which direct proof can exist.

And when I ask you how a burden of proof for a negative proposition could ever be satisfied, you went off on a tirade explaining how you didn't have to answer that question because I was such a dunce. In other words: you realized you'd been refuted, but instead of conceding you chose to try to save face.

Are you trying to be a troll...

Wow, you just accused me of being a troll?

Because you can't seriously miss seeing something this obvious.

Consider that it's obvious to you only because you're the one missing something.

 

[epeos76]

I for one expect that a lawsuit has at least some evidence behind it, so that it has a chance of actually succeeding.

And I expect that if a lawsuit is done without any evidence to back it up, it'll promptly be thrown out of court for wasting everyone's time.

True for a generous value of "promptly".

 

[epeos76]

. . . And completely failed to notice that there were 18 pages in this thread before I posted.

 

[Mojo]

Although much, if not most, terrorism, are false flag operations, to say that the cabal and terrorists are the same thing is incorrect.

Do you have any more evidence to support your claim that the Fuji Bank is part of the "cabal" than there is to support an assertion that the terrorists were part of the "cabal"?

ETA: the amount of evidence that supports either claim so far submitted is, of course, none.

 

[Craig4]

Flawed logic. Try again.

How would you be able to identify flawed logic?

 

[Craig4]

I have heard that the 9/11 victims may be faked, so-called vicsims. So you need first to prove that there are actual victims before you can use that as some kind of accusation.

What the Hell are you babbling about here? I assume you've watched video of the attacks. Only someone totally divorced from reality bat **** insane, oops deary you're drooling on your pillow it's time to take your medicine crazy could possibly watch those videos and conclude there were no victims.

Thank you for for doing such an outstanding job in proving my point that this topic deserves better than you.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Wow, you just accused me of being a troll?

No I didn't.

 

[Anders Lindman]

How would you be able to identify flawed logic?

If someone says something without providing evidence, then that's not the same as what is being said is false.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Do you have any more evidence to support your claim that the Fuji Bank is part of the "cabal" than there is to support an assertion that the terrorists were part of the "cabal"?

ETA: the amount of evidence that supports either claim so far submitted is, of course, none.

Check the 9/11 section for Fuji Bank. And there were no terrorists hijacking any planes. That's the reason for the USAF 'stand down' which was no stand down at all but merely a consequence of there being no hijacked planes in the first place, but that's slightly off topic here.

 

[Anders Lindman]

"Benjamin Fulford 1-23-12…”Secret government regime change in Asia nears completion, Satanic cabal in West crumbling”

…the battle over control of the global financial system and therefore the future of the planet Earth is proceeding well for the White Dragon Society and its allies.

…Interpol is steadily squeezing criminals like George Soros and Senator J. Rockefeller and something big may happen before the key January 31st accounts settling date." -- http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/201...s-completion-satanic-cabal-in-west-crumbling/

 

[Mojo]

If someone says something without providing evidence, then that's not the same as what is being said is false.

OTOH, there's absolutely no reason to think that what is being said is true.

 

[Anders Lindman]

OTOH, there's absolutely no reason to think that what is being said is true.

So when you tell someone you know you had Big Mac for lunch, do you need to provide evidence for that statement? Ha ha.

 

[twinstead]

So when you tell someone you know you had Big Mac for lunch, do you need to provide evidence for that statement? Ha ha.

When you tell someone that a 4 foot tall Big Mac is living in your garage and teaching interpretive dance to unicorns, do you need to provide evidence for that statement, or do you expect others to prove it false?

 

[SpitfireIX]

If someone says something without providing evidence, then that's not the same as what is being said is false.

No, but if the claim is extraordinary, it must be assumed false until proven true. This has been explained to you several times already.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Maybe the wrong forum. I'm out of here.

Yes, you appear to be in a critical thinkers forum with unsubstantiated claims.
Including this one.

 

[TheRedWorm]

When you tell someone that a 4 foot tall Big Mac is living in your garage and teaching interpretive dance to unicorns, do you need to provide evidence for that statement, or do you expect others to prove it false?

He is a troll people. This is his MO. He will pretend to believe even the most far-fetched, evidence free crap knowing you will give him 10+ pages of replies.

 

[JayUtah]

If someone says something without providing evidence, then that's not the same as what is being said is false.

Who has the burden of proof and why?

 

[JayUtah]

No I didn't [accuse you of being a troll].

Good. Having therefore agreed that my question is properly intentioned, please provide an answer for it. Who as the burden of proof for the validity of the story, and why?