Tomtomkent
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Messages
- 8,607
Then you need to consider all evidence that will falsify it. Simply stating it is falsifiable is not enough. Stating that an alternative cabal is evidence you are wrong is not enough.
Then you need to consider all evidence that will falsify it. Simply stating it is falsifiable is not enough. Stating that an alternative cabal is evidence you are wrong is not enough.
"lets all surround ourselves with white light and protection"
"Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis20120109: The Feds have sued for peace and detailed settlement negotiations have begun
In a very major development, the Federal Reserve Board faction that is in de-facto control of the Obama regime and Israel has approached the White Dragon Society to negotiate a way to unfreeze their funds. They have promised to use any released funds for humanitarian projects and to develop hitherto forbidden technology." -- Full blog post: http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/...ailed-settlement-negotiations-have-begun.html
Anders have you listened to this interview about this by David Wilcox?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcy0X5w3KwU like seriously?
at one point they were implying that aliens have been harvesting the world of our gold.
seriously fruitloop, the lot of them IMO.
You have absolutely no ability to tell fact from fiction do you?
Originally Posted by Anders Lindman
"Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis20120109: The Feds have sued for peace and detailed settlement negotiations have begun
In a very major development, the Federal Reserve Board faction that is in de-facto control of the Obama regime and Israel has approached the White Dragon Society to negotiate a way to unfreeze their funds. They have promised to use any released funds for humanitarian projects and to develop hitherto forbidden technology." -- Full blog post: http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/b...ave-begun.html
You have absolutely no ability to tell fact from fiction do you?
It COULD be true!
no, you are correct, she said it, but he knew what she meant.
"anonymous" was also attempting to imply that he was in fact an alien himself.
the "bigger distances than you can imagine.." thing, several times. clearly a plant by Kerry "aliens" Cassidy IMO.
not the most credible of places to be interviewed by is it? interspersed with astrologists, chakras and white light.
does anybody else apart from total fruitloops take him seriously?
Sometimes talk about space aliens and UFOs and things like that may just be smokescreens to on purpose make the information incredible while in fact the main facts are true (and sometimes even info about UFOs etc can be true).
why? they either want us to believe it or they dont?
if you were trying to convince me of something fairly outrageous, would you further surround it with things you knew sounded really ridiculous?
Sometimes talk about space aliens and UFOs and things like that may just be smokescreens to on purpose make the information incredible, while in fact the main facts are true (and sometimes even info about UFOs etc can be true).
Then my hypothesis is false. But then the question is: Who the heck was Woodrow Wilson talking about in the below quote?
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." -- Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States
Woodrow Wilson said:Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him. For if he begins to sell to certain retail dealers, to any retail dealers, the monopoly will refuse to sell to those dealers, and those dealers, afraid, will not buy the new man's wares.
And this is the country which has lifted to the admiration of the world its ideals of absolutely free opportunity, where no man is supposed to be under any limitation except the limitations of his character and of his mind; where there is supposed to be no distinction of class, no distinction of blood, no distinction of social status, but where men win or lose on their merits.
I lay it very close to my own conscience as a public man whether we can any longer stand at our doors and welcome all newcomers upon those terms. American industry is not free, as once it was free; American enterprise is not free; the man with only a little capital is finding it harder to get into the field, more and more impossible to compete with the big fellow. Why? Because the laws of this country do not prevent the strong from crushing the weak. That is the reason, and because the strong have crushed the weak the strong dominate the industry and the economic life of this country. No man can deny that the lines of endeavor have more and more narrowed and stiffened; no man who knows anything about the development of industry in this country can have failed to observe that the larger kinds of credit are more and more difficult to obtain, unless you obtain them upon the terms of uniting your efforts with those who already control the industries of the country; and nobody can fail to observe that any man who tries to set himself up in competition with any process of manufacture which has been taken under the control of large combinations of capital will presently find himself either squeezed out or obliged to sell and allow himself to be absorbed.
There is a great deal that needs reconstruction in the United States. I should like to take a census of the business men,—I mean the rank and file of the business men,—as to whether they think that business conditions in this country, or rather whether the organization of business in this country, is satisfactory or not. I know what they would say if they dared. If they could vote secretly they would vote overwhelmingly that the present organization of business was meant for the big fellows and was not meant for the little fellows; that it was meant for those who are at the top and was meant to exclude those who are at the bottom; that it was meant to shut out beginners, to prevent new entries in the race, to prevent the building up of competitive enterprises that would interfere with the monopolies which the great trusts have built up.
What this country needs above everything else is a body of laws which will look after the men who are on the make rather than the men who are already made. Because the men who are already made are not going to live indefinitely, and they are not always kind enough to leave sons as able and as honest as they are.
Well, if you bothered to find out where the quote came from, then you could read it in context. BTW, it comes from his book, "The New Freedom" which was published in 1913 and is compilation of some of his campaign speeches.
Here is a more complete quote.
Reading that, it is obvious that he is talking about monopolies and the need for the government to limit those monopolies that stifle competition.
Its about Monopolies; I actually read that entire book and a number of others about that period and the financial actions of that time.
Monopolies: you might want to look at the terms robber barons, International Harvester, American Tobacco, Standard oil and U.S Steel and the Clayton act
Why isn't it enough?
It's not obvious. Why would the big business people Wilson talked to in private be afraid of monopolies? For crying out loud, they were themselves a part of those monopolies! So that logic doesn't really compute.