Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

[Mojo]

If I find any evidence I can post it. It's just that at the moment all I have is a bunch of theories.

I doubt that they are even hypotheses.

 

[Hans]

I doubt that they are even hypotheses.

More likely weak flights of fancy coughing out their lifes blood do to an embarrassing lack of evidence.

 

[Tomtomkent]

If I had evidence it would be conspiracy fact, not conspiracy theory.

Please, explain what you think defines a theory.

A theory is not just a random idea. A theory is the best explanation for the available evidence. You have no evidence, so how could you possibly form a theory?

What you have sir, is not a theory. It is an unsupported idea. At best a hypothosis, but a rather useless one as you have no way of putting it to the test, to gather the data on which to build the theory.

 

[Tomtomkent]

If I had evidence it would be conspiracy fact, not conspiracy theory.

You know, you really shouldn't both use the word "theory" and admit your lack of evidence in the same sentence. It only begs me to repeat:

Theories are based on data and evidence. So, unless this is the Conspiracy Hypothosis section, maybe you could provide evidence the Cabal exists, so you can then theorise about its actions?

Unless you are attemtping to formulate the best explanation for evidence at hand, you do not have a theory.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Please, explain what you think defines a theory.

A theory is not just a random idea. A theory is the best explanation for the available evidence. You have no evidence, so how could you possibly form a theory?

What you have sir, is not a theory. It is an unsupported idea. At best a hypothosis, but a rather useless one as you have no way of putting it to the test, to gather the data on which to build the theory.

As I wrote before, I do not necessarily defend the lawsuit. So why do you expect evidence? Let's wait and see how things unfold.

 

[Tomtomkent]

As I wrote before, I do not necessarily defend the lawsuit. So why do you expect evidence? Let's wait and see how things unfold.

And exactly how will that support the specific claims of Vatican Assassins and Cabals causing 9/11 I asked you supply evidence for?

 

[Anders Lindman]

And exactly how will that support the specific claims of Vatican Assassins and Cabals causing 9/11 I asked you supply evidence for?

Think of it as an outrageous conspiracy theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ

 

[Craig4]

If I find any evidence I can post it. It's just that at the moment all I have is a bunch of theories.

No what you have are most properly classified as mere conjecture. A theory provides a framework to explain facts. You're nowhere close to that. You've just allowed yourself to be lead around by the nose by liars and con men like David Wilcock.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Think of it as an outrageous conspiracy theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ

I would like to think of it as a theory, but as already explained: Theories are based upon evidence. That you tube video is not evidence for a Cabal nor Vatican Assassins. So please, where is the evidence that your "outrageous" theory explains?


Or is it just a Conspiracy Hypothosis?
A conspircay Idea?
A Conspiracy Burbling Pulled From Nowhere?
A Conspiracy Cry For Attention?

 

[Anders Lindman]

No what you have are most properly classified as mere conjecture. A theory provides a framework to explain facts. You're nowhere close to that. You've just allowed yourself to be lead around by the nose by liars and con men like David Wilcock.

I take in all kinds of information. When it comes to the lawsuit, ok it's maybe not a theory I have. I don't think it matters much though since the lawsuit stands by itself. What I have done is basically to summarize it and added some conspiracy theories around it. My current intuition tells me that I haven't anything really clear yet. My ideas around this are speculations so far. We'll see what happens. I'm a bit curious about what David Wilcock will publish in part III.

 

[Anders Lindman]

I would like to think of it as a theory, but as already explained: Theories are based upon evidence. That you tube video is not evidence for a Cabal nor Vatican Assassins. So please, where is the evidence that your "outrageous" theory explains?


Or is it just a Conspiracy Hypothosis?
A conspircay Idea?
A Conspiracy Burbling Pulled From Nowhere?
A Conspiracy Cry For Attention?

Ok, it's not a theory I have presented. Only speculations so far.

 

[Craig4]

For those unfamiliar, this is some of David Wilcock's work. This guy is a real piece or work. What a liar and fraud. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Yp6YdoZ9d8&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL3D87B378EADFADE9

ETA: That fact that some of the audience, (some real one-world types and true believers) seemed to be not believing his weird ass fairy tales gave me hope for the future.

 

[Craig4]

Ok, it's not a theory I have presented. Only speculations so far.

So, given the obviously poor quality of both your reasoning and education on any of the topics you pontificate about why do you even bother posting them? Your input clearly offers no value beyond entertainment.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So, given the obviously poor quality of both your reasoning and education on any of the topics you pontificate about why do you even bother posting them? Your input clearly offers no value beyond entertainment.

I think it's a very interesting lawsuit, and what IF it turns out true? That would be the scoop of the century so far.

 

[JayUtah]

I think it's a very interesting lawsuit, and what IF it turns out true? That would be the scoop of the century so far.

I can sue Harvey Fierstein claiming he's the Easter Bunny and impregnated by sister with space alien spawn. That would also be a very interesting lawsuit, if for the sheer morbid fascination of watching it argued under actual legal rules of engagement. That doesn't make it true. All frivolous lawsuits would be fascinating if true. Real lawsuits are boring -- you know, the ones that involve actual fact.

Keenan was obviously scammed and his suit is obviously farfetched and baseless.

 

[Craig4]

I think it's a very interesting lawsuit, and what IF it turns out true? That would be the scoop of the century so far.

If pigs could fly I bet pork wings would be delicious.

 

[Border Reiver]

If pigs could fly I bet pork wings would be delicious.

Mmmmmm, pork wings.

 

[Craig4]

Mmmmmm, pork wings.

The idea of pork wings makes me want to give a donation to a genetic engineering research laboratory.

 

[Anders Lindman]

"Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis20120109: The Feds have sued for peace and detailed settlement negotiations have begun

In a very major development, the Federal Reserve Board faction that is in de-facto control of the Obama regime and Israel has approached the White Dragon Society to negotiate a way to unfreeze their funds. They have promised to use any released funds for humanitarian projects and to develop hitherto forbidden technology." -- Full blog post: http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/...ailed-settlement-negotiations-have-begun.html

 

[Tomtomkent]

I believe the vatican has a secret group of Morris Dancers that control the silly non-bonds. If no evidence to support any of these baseless assertions is ever found you will be able to read, on my evidence free blog, that this simply proves the extent the Morris Dancers will go to when it comes to hiding their existence.

They live in a secret moonbase and are the only ones who know that bears never do poop in the wood.


Yeah, speculation is fun,but whats the point of pretending any of these assertions bare the slightest resemblance to truth?