• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Genesis Seal

Dinwar said:
My suggestion is, take some time off to put together one well-worded post outlining your ideas, and the evidence that your ideas are true. Then come back. We'll wait for a long time for you to do that--but this crew has little patience for people that expect us to not respond to half-formed arguments. We're argumentative.
Click to expand...

Half-formed? Amorphous.
 
dafydd wrote:
Please address this:

Quote:
I came up with over 50 words doing the same thing with the Enuma Elish, you ignored that because it didn't fit your preconceived idea, thats confirmation bias right there
Click to expand...

Given that the Enuma Elish consists of around a thousand lines of text, your efforts can hardly be compared with the 64 letters of the Genesis Seal. Consider the ill-fated bible code based on about 20,000 words. In this matter, the extreme compactness of the Seal is everything.
 
You aren't limited to 160 characters, this is not twitter. Put your information into one post, as Dinwar suggests, and then we can look at it. As it's midnight here (and in Blackburn), I suspect you won't do this tonight, but it's something to bear in mind for tomorrow.
 
Kingfisher2926 said:
dafydd wrote:


Given that the Enuma Elish consists of around a thousand lines of text, your efforts can hardly be compared with the 64 letters of the Genesis Seal. Consider the ill-fated bible code based on about 20,000 words. In this matter, the extreme compactness of the Seal is everything.
Click to expand...

in this matter, you are deluded, it isnt about what the actual text is, but the arrangement of a limited number of letters in it. To claim otherwise is just bs, don't you realise what you just said is nonsense
1. It requires a large text or it won't work
2. it just requires the first 64 letters of that text to work

basically youre just posting crap as excuses because you think we're all stupid, truth is, we are all apparently more intelligent than you are, and some of our knowledge leaves yours in the shade
Marduk said:
so a question
Q. Show any character in history was aware of this with direct evidence (i.e. not your suspicions)

I will keep asking this question, if you refuse to answer, we will all know youre making it up
Click to expand...
answer it
this is your ninth oppotunity
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Agatha said:
You aren't limited to 160 characters, this is not twitter. Put your information into one post, as Dinwar suggests, and then we can look at it. As it's midnight here (and in Blackburn), I suspect you won't do this tonight, but it's something to bear in mind for tomorrow.
Click to expand...

Midnight, midday. You'll never get the information. It doesn't exist.
 
Agatha wrote:
If you miss out the vowels (like Hebrew) the first sentence of Harry Potter and The Philosopher's Stone has exactly 64 letters.

Because I had nothing better to do this evening, I put those 64 letters into the square the OP suggested.

There are plenty of words one can make running horizontally and vertically, adding in vowels where necessary. Some of them even relate to Harry Potter for example Ron, auror, seer, late, shoot, fire, Lord, fatal, keeper...
Click to expand...
How many of them are positionally connected in striking configurations? Then, if you reverse the text in the same grid, do you get equally stunning conjunctions in precisely the same places? That is what happens in the Genesis Seal.
 
Marduk said:
in this matter, you are deluded, it isnt about what the actual text is, but the arrangement of a limited number of letters in it. To claim otherwise is just bs, don't you realise what you just said is nonsense
1. It requires a large text or it won't work
2. it just requires the first 64 letters of that text to work

answer it
this is your ninth oppotunity
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It wouldn't take him long to type the name of one person. We can do our own investigating. The truth is that he has no character in mind,
 
So, if I put the Genesis Sealion in my pool, what would I feed it? Do you think it would eat corn dogs? I have lots of them that the Corn Gods bestowed upon me, although they have been in storage for months, and may not be as tasty as they once were.
 
I have him on ignore but I will bet that his last post did not answer the question. It was probably more conformation bias. We need more entertaining chew toys than him.
 
Kingfisher2926 said:
How many of them are positionally connected in striking configurations?
Click to expand...
The "striking configurations" are artifacts of the fact that you used a square. If you'd used some other geometric shape, they may not exist or may be even more striking. Try a hexagon, a triangle, a pentagon, etc., see what you come up with.
 
Kingfisher2926 said:
Given that the Enuma Elish consists of around a thousand lines of text, your efforts can hardly be compared with the 64 letters of the Genesis Seal. Consider the ill-fated bible code based on about 20,000 words. In this matter, the extreme compactness of the Seal is everything.
Click to expand...
And the Bible contains many thousands of lines of text - your objection is illogical.

You are using a verse and a bit of one book of the Bible, Marduk used a specific piece of the Enuma Elish, I used one complete sentence of HP&TPS. If anything, HP should be a better text to use as the first sentence is exactly 64 letters (without vowels), whereas your method not only uses part of a verse, it cuts off in the middle of a word.
 
Kingfisher2926 said:
How many of them are positionally connected in striking configurations? Then, if you reverse the text in the same grid, do you get equally stunning conjunctions in precisely the same places? That is what happens in the Genesis Seal.
Click to expand...
Lots, and yes. That is what happens when you put a limited number of letters into a shape such that you can read in different directions - you get patterns. Some of those patterns will be words, and you can ascribe special meaning to some of the words. It's just human pattern forming behaviour, nothing mystic or divine about it.

I attached the first grid I did with Harry Potter to a previous post; if I have some free time tomorrow I will highlight some 'striking' configurations and perhaps do a reverse of the text. I fully expect to find more words and patterns in the reversed text, it would be most surprising if I didn't. That does not mean there is hidden meaning in the first sentence of HP&TPS, just that this will happen whatever text you use.

ETA and please, learn to use the quote function. It's the box marked "quote" at the bottom of the post you wish to respond to.
 
Last edited:
Agatha said:
Lots, and yes. That is what happens when you put a limited number of letters into a shape such that you can read in different directions - you get patterns. Some of those patterns will be words, and you can ascribe special meaning to some of the words. It's just human pattern forming behaviour, nothing mystic or divine about it.

I attached the first grid I did with Harry Potter to a previous post; if I have some free time tomorrow I will highlight some 'striking' configurations and perhaps do a reverse of the text. I fully expect to find more words and patterns in the reversed text, it would be most surprising if I didn't. That does not mean there is hidden meaning in the first sentence of HP&TPS, just that this will happen whatever text you use.
ETA and please, learn to use the quote function. It's the box marked "quote" at the bottom of the post you wish to respond to.
Click to expand...

Kingfisher seems hell bent on ignoring this.
 
Dinwar said:
You have to show two things: first, what your method is…
Click to expand...

First things first, my method was blind chance. I make no claims to a connection between the Genesis Seal and the Ulam spiral. All that did was prompt me to think in a new way about something else. Just how much method is needed to find one's way around a well-designed ard gallery. I'm not offering scientific rigour here, only a window onto the most beautiful vista I ever saw.

Also, thanks for the technical advice.
 
dafydd said:
Kingfisher seems hell bent on ignoring this.
Click to expand...
Indeed. Perhaps if we put our objections and questions in a 8x8 grid, s/he might actually address the posts being made. ;)
 
Agatha said:
Indeed. Perhaps if we put our objections and questions in a 8x8 grid, s/he might actually address the posts being made. ;)
Click to expand...

This thread is proving to be a monumental waste of time. Just another ten-a-penny woo.
 
slingblade said:
The first page of a google search reveals this thread, and something to do with trucks, or truck bed liners. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I saw that too. At least they exist. If there was a rumour of the Genesis Seal in the past then some nutter would have started a site about it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom