Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clayton Moore said:
It's hardly damaged. And the little section at the top is supposed to have overwhelmed the undamaged portion of the building in less than 20 seconds? ahahahahahhahahahahaha
Click to expand...

First the top destroyed the floor below, then the top + 1 destroyed the floor below that, then the top + 2 destroyed the floor below that, ect. ect. ect.
 
Someone who can't do physics said this about the North Tower.

It's hardly damaged.
Click to expand...

The building is damaged beyond repair. The impact of Flight 175 was equal in energy to a 2,000 pound bomb; the kinetic energy of the impact was equal in energy to a 2,000 pound bomb. It damaged the exterior and the core, and destroyed the fire protection systems. Lack of knowledge, and having no skills in math and physics has this poor denier making stupid statements.
 
tsig said:
First the top destroyed the floor below, then the top + 1 destroyed the floor below that, then the top + 2 destroyed the floor below that, ect. ect. ect.
Click to expand...

It's almost impossible to simplify it enough for an individual whom doesn't understand the most primal mechanics in physics
 
"Precise preperation" really just means take out all the salvageable materials in the building like glass, aluminum, copper, iron, etc. However, verinage does not need any kind of structural weekening prior to demolition.
 
Clayton Moore said:
It's hardly damaged. And the little section at the top is supposed to have overwhelmed the undamaged portion of the building in less than 20 seconds? ahahahahahhahahahahaha
Click to expand...

article-1249885-083AA80E000005DC-387_470x627.jpg



Hardly damaged??????? That's fires over at least 10 floors
 
Wow. It's only when one realizes just how big that building was does one really understand the extent of the damage and fires
 
Clayton Moore said:
It's hardly damaged. And the little section at the top is supposed to have overwhelmed the undamaged portion of the building in less than 20 seconds? ahahahahahhahahahahaha
Click to expand...


I do know verinage requires precise preparation and I don't think it has been performed on a steel framed building,
Click to expand...

1) The 25+ floors above WTC2's impact site would certainly have some impact collapsing onto the lower floors.

2) Verniage requires the removal of support, allowing the upper stories to fall onto the lower stories, pancaking them.

3) The WTCs were struck by jet airliners then burned out of control for an hour. The support steel softened and lost the majority of its structural integrity. A "Verniage" pancake collapse followed.
 
Last edited:
twinstead said:
Wow. It's only when one realizes just how big that building was does one really understand the extent of the damage and fires
Click to expand...

If I hold my finger in front of the picture it sort of covers 10% of it, so the WTC was very small therefore the fires were really small! I dont even know how they fit that many people in there I really dont. Btw I lit a match the other day and it didnt collapse at free fall speed into my hand, you bunkers are so stupid
 
Edx said:
If I hold my finger in front of the picture it sort of covers 10% of it, so the WTC was very small therefore the fires were really small! I dont even know how they fit that many people in there I really dont. Btw I lit a match the other day and it didnt collapse at free fall speed into my hand, you bunkers are so stupid
Click to expand...

You have convinced me, where do I sign up? :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom