JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

[Tomtomkent]

Not all Lone Nutters have always been Lone Nutters. I believed the assassination was a conspiracy for years. Then I read Best Evidence and started to realize the CTs were out of their gourd. Crossfire was the final nail in my conspiracy coffin.

Best evidence was not fully convinvcing? Even the speculationon rebuilding and remodelling a human corpse?

 

[RoboTimbo]

The pic is merely an example of how easy it is to alter a film. Obviously.

Yes, that was a good demonstration of how obvious altering the film with a crayon is. You may want to rethink your strategy on that one. I don't think your feet can take much more.

Now perhaps you would like to address the question at hand. Is there a discrepancy of the right front head wound as depicted in the Z film and the death stare photo?

Then you are now admitting that the Zapruder film shows the exit wound to the right front of Kennedy's head? Good job! Why have you been so adamant until now that there was no such exit wound? Nope, no discrepancy, as has been explained with uncropped photos numerous times to you.

No more Red Herrings Crayon, please. Let's all act like grown-ups.

FTFY. LOL.

 

[Robert Prey]

Yes, that was a good demonstration of how obvious altering the film with a crayon is. You may want to rethink your strategy on that one. I don't think your feet can take much more.


Then you are now admitting that the Zapruder film shows the exit wound to the right front of Kennedy's head? Good job! Why have you been so adamant until now that there was no such exit wound? Nope, no discrepancy, as has been explained with uncropped photos numerous times to you.
FTFY. LOL.

Your "uncropped" photo shows a face and a right temple in tact except for a small entrance wound consistent with all of the Parkland personnel's observations and in contrast to what you have claimed the Z film shows.

 

[RoboTimbo]

Your "uncropped" photo shows a face and a right temple in tact except for a small entrance wound consistent with all of the Parkland personnel's observations and in contrast to what you have claimed the Z film shows.

Then why do the CTs always show the cropped photo?

So, let's get back to you admitting that the Zapruder film shows the exit wound in the right front of JFK's head. Why are you changing your story now? Or rather, why were you so adamant that it didn't show what it shows before?

 

[bynmdsue]

You are seriously not seeing a large exit wound in this picture?

NSFW - Graphic image

http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/history/news-jfk-autopsies-and-conspiries-photos?image=7

 

[Robert Prey]

You are seriously not seeing a large exit wound in this picture?
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/history/news-jfk-autopsies-and-conspiries-photos?image=7

I see a totally intact face. Where do you see an "exit" wound????

 

[Robert Prey]

Then why do the CTs always show the cropped photo?

So, let's get back to you admitting that the Zapruder film shows the exit wound in the right front of JFK's head. Why are you changing your story now? Or rather, why were you so adamant that it didn't show what it shows before?

The exit wound is your interpretation. I see something on the Z film that I don't see in the Death Stare Photo, whatever it is. And your nonsensical claim that CT's never show the full photo is false. The only time I showed a cropped photo was when introducing the full youtube video which shows all, but the intro had a still photo which was cropped. I know it's hard, but let's try to act like grown-ups.

 

[I Ratant]

Oh, you've actually talked to some of the "novelists", eh? And just who have you talked to that you find so ludicrous????? Names, please.

.
None of them are or will be you.
Plagarism and quote mining isn't publishing.

 

[RoboTimbo]

The exit wound is your interpretation.

No, the exit wound is confirmed by the video you posted and the website you posted. Don't you remember?

I see something on the Z film that I don't see in the Death Stare Photo, whatever it is.

Thus my question to I Ratant about the motivation of CTs and their cognitive dissonance.

And your nonsensical claim that CT's never show the full photo is false. The only time I showed a cropped photo was when introducing the full youtube video which shows all, but the intro had a still photo which was cropped. I know it's hard, but let's try to act like grown-ups.

I'm sure you do know it's hard to act like an adult. You'll get there someday.

When will you be providing that evidence for "all" Parkland personnel? More cognitive dissonance on your part? Did you miss where I posted the testimony of the chief autopsy surgeon? Did you do the homework assigned to you, pages 86 & 87 of Chapter 3 of the WCR?

 

[I Ratant]

Rubbish for two reasons:
1) first generation copies of the full film exist and have already been discussed.
2) there remains no evidence of the rear exit wound AFTER the "missing" frames, or from the polaroid taken after the three shots were fired.

.
Rotoscoping the film finds all the frames are where they should be.
The limosine doesn't stop.
It (and nothing else ither) can stop and get back to speed in less than a second.
Looking at the Kodak markings on the edge of the film show it is continuous.
Real old stuff, long ago sent to the CT sewer.

 

[Tomtomkent]

I see a totally intact face. Where do you see an "exit" wound????

Why are you looking at the face and not at the front top of the head? Where much of the skull has been blasted away? Why do you think a fold of skin is an entry wound?

Who was it you claimed had their head in the sand?

Why is there no exit wound to the back of the head? Why is there no exit wound to the back of the head in the z film? Or the polaroid?

Come on Robert, you want to be grown up here, so dazzle us with a coherent explanation supported by material evidence. Admit you were wrong. Gracefully appologise forsuggesting a witness claim, even with a drawing, is evidence. Find some material evidence to support your accusation that the autopsy is the fraudulant narrative. Explain how the exit wound to the back of the head appeared after the plaza.

You said you wanted to be grown up here Robert. Its a noble idea. All you haveto do is start.

 

[I Ratant]

Not all Lone Nutters have always been Lone Nutters. I believed the assassination was a conspiracy for years. Then I read Best Evidence and started to realize the CTs were out of their gourd. Crossfire was the final nail in my conspiracy coffin.

.
Yes sir, it doesn't take long to finger that out, does it?
Like the no-planers in 9-11, ya gots to wonder about the defective mental processes involved.
Crayons are the most dangerous objects these guys should handle...with adult supervision, of course.

 

[Tomtomkent]

The exit wound is your interpretation. I see something on the Z film that I don't see in the Death Stare Photo, whatever it is. And your nonsensical claim that CT's never show the full photo is false. The only time I showed a cropped photo was when introducing the full youtube video which shows all, but the intro had a still photo which was cropped. I know it's hard, but let's try to act like grown-ups.

Because claiming not to see the large hole that matches the trajectories of the ejecta is so adult?

You talked often of projecting, but it appears self diagnosis is the hardest.

 

[I Ratant]

The exit wound is your interpretation. I see something on the Z film that I don't see in the Death Stare Photo, whatever it is.

.
It's not a plane flying into the north tower, either.
.

And your nonsensical claim that CT's never show the full photo is false. The only time I showed a cropped photo was when introducing the full youtube video which shows all, but the intro had a still photo which was cropped. I know it's hard, but let's try to act like grown-ups.

.
And despite all the efforts by the grown-ups, you piddle away and play with your crayons, when given the most caring help possible to cure your delusion.

 

[Robert Prey]

.
None of them are or will be you.
Plagarism and quote mining isn't publishing.

Yeah, well you know what I think? I don't think you've talked to anybody. That's what I think.

 

[RoboTimbo]

Answer the questions, Robert.

No, the exit wound is confirmed by the video you posted and the website you posted. Don't you remember?


Thus my question to I Ratant about the motivation of CTs and their cognitive dissonance.


I'm sure you do know it's hard to act like an adult. You'll get there someday.

When will you be providing that evidence for "all" Parkland personnel? More cognitive dissonance on your part? Did you miss where I posted the testimony of the chief autopsy surgeon? Did you do the homework assigned to you, pages 86 & 87 of Chapter 3 of the WCR?

 

[RoboTimbo]

...the right front head wound as depicted in the Z film...

Bang!

 

[matt.tansy]

Best evidence was not fully convinvcing? Even the speculationon rebuilding and remodelling a human corpse?

Oh, sure, I can buy that.

It's the entire scenario the conspirators came up with that changed my mind including using multiple professional snipers requiring multiple shots to kill one unsuspecting, unprotected man in a slow moving car did it for me.

CTs always talk about LHO's amazing marksmanship: 3 shots in 6 seconds!!1!
No, LHO was a lousy shot: it took him 3 tries to kill Kennedy. If he was an amazing marksman he would have killed Kennedy on his first try.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Yeah, well you know what I think? I don't think you've talked to anybody. That's what I think.

Acting like an adult didn't last long.

You are missing point still. Nobody cares what you think. We have had page after page of what you think. What we want are you to answer the questions your posts raise and show us the material evidence.

That is what being a grown up means. Before you try to belittle others, give being a grown up a go.

 

[I Ratant]

Masaad Ayoob had several professional shooters at a "Second Chance" match in 1993 try the 6th floor/JFK shot at a target moving on a zip-line, using a Carcano.
All of them got the shots off, one guy managing two shots in the 1.6 seconds of the "impulses" on the Dicta-belt..with that rifle, and hitting the target.
America Handgunner.. March/April 1993.