Merged So there was melted steel

[NoahFence]

My jaw dropped when I read that as well.

i wonder where he believes this steady supply of nano thermite came from!

Everybody who was there working on the pile had baggies full of nanotermites.

Every so often when they thought it was cooling down, they'd drop some in there to keep it going.

 

[DGM]

Everybody who was there working on the pile had baggies full of nanotermites.

Every so often when they thought it was cooling down, they'd drop some in there to keep it going.

Ah.............Magic Dust.

 

[jaydeehess]

Choke the fire and unless it is receiving a steady stream of falling nanothermitic dust, it will be extinguished.

As Dave so nicely pointed out, "...if the fire is buried, it's insulated, so it's harder for the heat to escape..."

Which accounts for what was observed in the WTC Ground Zero debris pile.

MM

Choke a fire such that it gets no oxygen and you will also ensure that no dust enters that volume.
Unless, that is, your nanothermite dust particles are smaller than an oxygen molecule.

 

[Edx]

Choke a fire such that it gets no oxygen and you will also ensure that no dust enters that volume.
Unless, that is, your nanothermite dust particles are smaller than an oxygen molecule.

We dont know much about nano thermite, we dont know what the goverment has. They could make them smaller than a oxygen molecule or the same size, how do you know they haven't???

 

[Tomtomkent]

We dont know much about nano thermite, we dont know what the goverment has. They could make them smaller than a oxygen molecule or the same size, how do you know they haven't???

Because thermite, like any other chemical compound, is limitied by the size of the atoms required to make it.

 

[Zeuzzz]

We dont know much about nano thermite, we dont know what the goverment has. They could make them smaller than a oxygen molecule or the same size, how do you know they haven't???

Oxygen isn't even a molecule; its an element. And a small one at that, with only 8 electrons/energy states. We know all the possible elements that can be smaller than it and there are only seven.

 

[Oystein]

Oxygen isn't even a molecule; its an element. And a small one at that, with only 8 electrons/energy states. We know all the possible elements that can be smaller than it and there are only seven.

Ahem

oxygen is a ... gas with the molecular formula O2, in which the two oxygen atoms are chemically bonded to each other

 

[Zeuzzz]

Ahem

Yes you'll nearly always find them in pairs due to atoms wanting 8 electrons in their outer energy level. O2 is a tiny molecule oxygen can form, hard to get anything smaller that could explain the aforementioned theory.

 

[tsig]

Choke a fire such that it gets no oxygen and you will also ensure that no dust enters that volume.
Unless, that is, your nanothermite dust particles are smaller than an oxygen molecule.

Smaller than an oxygen molecule

Faster than a photon

Able to leap tall conclusions at a single bound

Thermite

Hotter than molten steel

Came to this Earth with powers and abilities far beyond the average molecule.

 

[waypastvne]

What if they used nano atoms?

 

[GlennB]

What if they used nano atoms?

That's a winner. Start up a website and invite donations.

$$$

 

[Edx]

Because thermite, like any other chemical compound, is limitied by the size of the atoms required to make it.

Wow so you think you know everything!! You dont know what the government has, but you think you can sit here and tell me whats impossible. Nano thermite is on the NANO size. You know what that means? It means its VERY VERY SMALL. Super microscopic. You can't even see it, if you can't see if you can't claim to know its not there. DUH. If you say nano thermite needs to have particles the size of oxygen particles then it probably does!! We know steel melted and we know there is no other way for steel to melt than for thermite to have caused it.

 

[Oystein]

Yes you'll nearly always find them in pairs due to atoms wanting 8 electrons in their outer energy level. O2 is a tiny molecule oxygen can form, hard to get anything smaller that could explain the aforementioned theory.

Pssst: Everybody here is mocking MM ^^

 

[MIKILLINI]

Is that a joke?

It is a joke, but Mirage is serious. I'm not kidding.

 

[Miragememories]

"Choke the fire and unless it is receiving a steady stream of falling nanothermitic dust, it will be extinguished.

As Dave so nicely pointed out, "...if the fire is buried, it's insulated, so it's harder for the heat to escape..."

Which accounts for what was observed in the WTC Ground Zero debris pile."

Is that a joke?

Did I use a confusing word?

My intent was to suggest a fire situation where there was insufficient ambient oxygen to sustain it.

If you look back in this thread you will understand my reference to nanothermitic dust, even if you don't agree with it.

No offense but I fail to see the joke?

MM

 

[Zeuzzz]

Ok MM I could look back but I simply don't have the time. Link maybe?

This is my problem on this forum. I don't have the time to even look into all the details and mechanics of the official story let alone every conspiracy theory that is put forward.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Did I use a confusing word?

My intent was to suggest a fire situation where there was insufficient ambient oxygen to sustain it.

If you look back in this thread you will understand my reference to nanothermitic dust, even if you don't agree with it.

No offense but I fail to see the joke?

MM

Tha dust can be smaller than o2. Hilarity obviously ensues. Please explain how the fires can be protected from something as small as oxygen, but fed nano-thermite? You realise that Nano specifies a set size range? That nano-anything is made from molecules. And any kind of thermite needs more molecules and more space than oxygen?

So if thermite can get through a hole to the fire... why not smaller and more plentiful oxygen?

 

[Tomtomkent]

And not to rub it in. But what ever other chemical reactions may take place, but choke a fire of oxygen and it is extinguished. You need all three sides of the triangle; heat, fuel and oxygen for fire.

A steady stream of thermite might cause a reaction, but it wont cause fire. So MMs use of "unless" makes no sense (the thermite would choke the fire).

 

[GlennB]

And not to rub it in. But what ever other chemical reactions may take place, but choke a fire of oxygen and it is extinguished. You need all three sides of the triangle; heat, fuel and oxygen for fire.

A steady stream of thermite might cause a reaction, but it wont cause fire. So MMs use of "unless" makes no sense (the thermite would choke the fire).

Umm, I don't quite get this. Thermite needs no air supply, so it would burn happily in a vacuum even. It wouldn't ignite other combustibles in the area without an air supply however, if that's what you mean?

MM's scheme is for the thermitic dust to (continuously and miraculously) arrive on the scene in a compartment of limited size, ignite in the ambient temperatures down there and relentlessly drive the temperature up to ~1500°C. It's a batcrap crazy theory of course, for many obvious reasons.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Umm, I don't quite get this. Thermite needs no air supply, so it would burn happily in a vacuum even. It wouldn't ignite other combustibles in the area without an air supply however, if that's what you mean?

MM's scheme is for the thermitic dust to (continuously and miraculously) arrive on the scene in a compartment of limited size, ignite in the ambient temperatures down there and relentlessly drive the temperature up to ~1500°C. It's a batcrap crazy theory of course, for many obvious reasons.

I thought mm had said the fire would be choked of oxygen and would go out unless fed with thermite. Thermatic reaction is burning, sure, but is not fire. Like you say the thermite will react and burn happily, but the fire could not be sustained with out oxygen. There is no "unless", there is one thing (a fire) being replaced by another (thermite burning).

Sorry I didn't make that clear.