MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2002
- Messages
- 24,961
That's a good question which people in aviation have tackled. Something about the impossibility of a plane going 500 mph a thousand feet above ground. The silly idea that dumb arabs did this, whose instructers said were basic dummies.
Dummies or not, they were certified pilots. If they had not died on 9/11, but joined Pilots for Truth, you would have taken them as authorities.
Whether I've proven beyond all doubt that no aircraft impacted the south tower is in question, but I have raised a ton of reasonable doubt.
In fact, you have debunked your own thesis. Look at it this way:
You have shown that a video can be called in doubt. Not too convincingly, but still. Since we have tons of direct eye witnesses, plus tangible forensic evidence, it follows that this evidence could never be disproved by videos.
Well done!
I have thoroughly debunked the divebomb footage and the cgi from the west. That leaves one possibility of the low south to north path which was filmed from the east and west. The orb cannot be excluded because it appears in 4 live clips and was referred to as flight 175.
Ahh, sorry, but all videos, plus direct witnesses corroborate on the same flight path.
The government has only one possible flight path that was most likely not visible from the north view, which is good for denialists. But you still have the other flight paths which are very different with media reptiles giving credibility to the orb by calling it the plane. A very big mess (it would be) with the orb being involved, whether it was some guidance device or the sole object that impacted the south tower. The divebomber is 13 seconds before impact and is behind, south of the towers. The orb in the all-important cbs footage is 15 seconds before explosion and is northwest of the towers, flying southeast over the Hudson.
I'm afraid I couldn't make head or tail of that. Could you elucidate, or must I read the entire thread?
The small buidling circled provides conclusive proof of the orb's diametric flight path to that of UA.
How does it do that?
http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcbbcdivebomb.jpg
Are you aware of what telescope objectives do to angle perception?
Is that what you call an orb?! I hope you are aware that the circle was added for emphasis. The black speck in the middle of the circle is the plane. That's what a distant plane looks like in VGA resolution.
As already said, I don't get what you mean about the building.
What about that? Is it a chopper? - Difficult to see on a low res still, but there were several choppers in the air, so.... what is your point?
Hans
