Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

7forever said:
Dishonest people that are simply trying to cover up the truth act like you do. But cult truthers trying to expose that truth always act like I do.

And i've seen your lies and games countless times before.:jaw-dropp

That alone proves you have no defense against video proof and won't defend the official myth of commercial jets being flown by dumb arabs.:D
Click to expand...

Yep, you can always trust what you see, ask any magician.
 
tsig said:
What's so absurd about planes hitting the towers?
Click to expand...

That's a good question which people in aviation have tackled. Something about the impossibility of a plane going 500 mph a thousand feet above ground. The silly idea that dumb arabs did this, whose instructers said were basic dummies. It goes on and on but my work is simple just like I did with jfk. I focused on tower 2 because of so many cameras filming after T1.

Whether I've proven beyond all doubt that no aircraft impacted the south tower is in question, but I have raised a ton of reasonable doubt. I have thoroughly debunked the divebomb footage and the cgi from the west. That leaves one possibility of the low south to north path which was filmed from the east and west. The orb cannot be excluded because it appears in 4 live clips and was referred to as flight 175.

The government has only one possible flight path that was most likely not visible from the north view, which is good for denialists. But you still have the other flight paths which are very different with media reptiles giving credibility to the orb by calling it the plane. A very big mess (it would be) with the orb being involved, whether it was some guidance device or the sole object that impacted the south tower. The divebomber is 13 seconds before impact and is behind, south of the towers. The orb in the all-important cbs footage is 15 seconds before explosion and is northwest of the towers, flying southeast over the Hudson. The small buidling circled provides conclusive proof of the orb's diametric flight path to that of UA.

wtcbbcdivebomb.jpg

wtccbsnw.jpg

wtcchopper4nw.jpg
 
Last edited:
About 5 minutes ago, I said to my friend, "guess what i learned today on this internet forum. I learned that reality isn't what we thought it was, this kid named 7forever says that planes hitting the WTC are all just lies from the media and the gov't, but he has the real truth!"

That was 5 minutes ago and he still hasn't stopped laughing at me. Should i call him a shill or an agent now?
 
7forever said:
That's a good question which people in aviation have tackled. Something about the impossibility of a plane going 500 mph a thousand feet above ground. The silly idea that dumb arabs did this, whose instructers said were basic dummies. It goes on and on but my work is simple just like I did with jfk. I focused on tower 2 because of so many cameras filming after T1.

Whether I've proven beyond all doubt that no aircraft impacted the south tower is in question, but I have raised a ton of reasonable doubt. I have thoroughly debunked the divebomb footage and the cgi from the west. That leaves one possibility of the low south to north path which was filmed from the east and west. The orb cannot be excluded because it appears in 4 live clips and was referred to as flight 175.

The government has only one possible flight path that was most likely not visible from the north view, which is good for denialists. But you still have the other flight paths which are very different with media reptiles giving credibility to the orb by calling it the plane. A very big mess (it would be) with the orb being involved, whether it was some guidance device or was the sole object that impacted the south tower. The divebomber is 13 seconds before impact and is behind, south of the towers. The orb in the all-important cbs footage is 15 seconds before explosion and is northwest of the towers, flying southeast over the Hudson. The small buidling circled provides conclusive proof of the orb's diametric flight path to that of UA.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcbbcdivebomb.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtccbsnw.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcchopper4nw.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

:dl::dl:
 
No planers like 7forever, Jammy, Bill Smith and Judy Wood are my favorite truthers, they make the whole truth movement seem even crazier than it already is, helping to kill the dying cult from within, while everyone else dismantles it from the outside.

Ahh, who am I kidding, the truth movement died two months ago.
 
7forever said:
At least you're being honest. Whether from the north or south view, tower 2 is always behind T1. From the north it's behind and to the left, and behind and right of T1 from the south. David's pic shows the west side and south impact area of the south tower. On the left, look under David and notice the smoke and fireball on the northeast corner of T2.
Click to expand...
Ahem, wouldn't T2 be in front of and to the right of T1 when viewed from the south? Perhaps you are using the word "behind" differently than I?
 
NoahFence said:
It's is an orb. 100% an orb. It's a special orb, with large, flat things protruding form the sides. I think they're called "wings". Also, these "wings" have distinctive circular shapes underneath them. These are called "engines" and they supposedly produce thrust to keep the orb aloft.

These special orbs are referred to as "airplanes".

So yea. They're orbs.
Click to expand...

United Orblines, Flight 175, 56 passengers and a crew of 9, bound from Logan Orbport, Boston to LAX, Los Angeles. Diverted by 5 orb-jackers. Flown into WTC Tower 2, approximately 9:03 am, September 11, 2001. No survivors.
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT which caused T2's fireball. I told y'all.:D

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcwestorb-1.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcsmallhelicopter.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtc175.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

HELLOOOOOO you need to pay attention to detail. You keep showing the real pictures. If you want people to believe you stop showing the real pictures. Why are you having such a hard time with this?
 
7forever said:
Crazy folks do not defend their crazy beliefs when faced with proof that those beliefs are easily proven lies.
Click to expand...


Yes they do and you just did. There is good clear video of both planes hitting the towers. A few poor videos do not cancel out the good ones and even if there was no good video at all the eye witness and forensic evidence is overwhelming.

To insist otherwise is insane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom