• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

UFOs: The Research, the Evidence

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok prove my photos are fakes, can you do that?


Uh, no. That's another argument from ignorance. You don't understand how it works.

You made the claim.

Therefore it's up to you to prove it, not up to me to prove it false.

Photographs posted on the Internet are not reliable or verifiable evidence.
 
As far as I know, edge, no one is claiming that your photos are fake. The only claim is that, based on the photo, it is not possible to definitively state what the blue dot is. That's all.


You were doing ok till you got here. You cannot seriously make that claim.

I was there soYes I can and there's more.
This town, this area is very strange.
The history is strange and weird.
I swear if you were to mine there with me for a month or two you Will see something one way or another that will blow your mind.
I have repeated that experiment too along with the dowsing experiments.
The experiments with the phenomena was, to see if they would be still there after 10 or 15 years later.
I was more ready with the aspect of recording them.
Why do you think I tried to photograph it?
It’s flying, it’s unidentified and the little woman didn’t believe me either, I told her about this place I had lived in before and that I mined there in the 80s, she didn’t believe me either.
The look on her face the next morning because she had one of her own, alone, which scared the crap out of her.
I have the originals.
 

Attachments

  • 8367661-R1-042-19A.jpg
    8367661-R1-042-19A.jpg
    148.9 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
The look on her face the next morning because she had one of her own, alone, that scared the crap out of her.
I have the originals.


The look on her face is "Stop taking my #$Q#@$@# picture."

You, edge, have no evidence.

This thread is about evidence.

If you have none, stop posting here.
 
Not at all. If the subject believes he saw what he saw, it wouldn't show up as a lie.
If the Polygraph operator was 'leading' the subject it makes any results highly dubious.
There are many many valid reasons why Polygraphs are not reliable and simply because the results are so variable and there is no way of filtering out unreliable results, they are not admissible as evidence in courts of law.

To prove something of a scientific nature, they would be deemed even less reliable.

So then the God helmet is even more unreliable for proving what Night terrors are.Yes?
 
Tomorrow, I will work up what I think it it was with some reasoning of mine and it will be up to you to prove me wrong.


I hope you intended this as a joke, PD. Of course we all know that the burden of proof is on the claimant, so if you posit an explanation, you'll be stuck with proving it.

The problem with all these cases is that there is no evidence, therefore nothing with which to prove them either way. All you can do is speculate to the best of your ability. Once you've done the legwork and put in the effort of piecing all the limited information together into a reasonable speculation, the door is still wide open for Tomi to simply refuse to accept it, and continue to argue that it therefore "defies plausible mundane explanation," and therefore must have been a "nuts and bolts craft," or whatever other nonsense Rramjet used to say.

That's why I never played his little "argument from ignorance game" in this thread, where he posed UFO sightings and then shifted the burden of proof onto the skeptics to debunk them. The whole concept is fundamentally flawed from the get-go.
 
Last edited:
So then the God helmet is even more unreliable for proving what Night terrors are.Yes?
This has nothing to do with the polygraph.

Boiled cabbage tastes horrible.
Boiled liver tastes even worse, but that doesn't make boiled cabbage taste any better.
 
Ok prove my photos are fakes, can you do that?
I know you will never find that I hoaxed them and they are the same as the day I took them with the corroborating story behind them.
You then cannot say they are mundane.
We watched this one for several nights but it was always across the creek till this night.
Till this night I passed it off as some one looking at us with night vision, I also thought it was reflections of a deer’s eyes, but it would have to be a one eyed deer.
Now that is a possibility but it would have to be a very tall deer.


I have seen some of the "orb" pictures that you've posted.

They are crap, an obviously not supernatural. That you think they are is pretty funny.

Why don't you post the best you've got so we can take a good look at them? We can discuss what they really are. :)
 
The look on her face is "Stop taking my #$Q#@$@# picture."

You, edge, have no evidence.

This thread is about evidence.

If you have none, stop posting here.

Of course she’s thinking that, these things screw with your mood.
Plus we were camping.

These photos are evidence.

I have multiple witnessing, plus photos.

This is all you got, stop posting?
 
Last edited:
Of course she’s thinking that, these things screw with your mood.
Plus we were camping.

These photos are evidence.

I have multiple witnessing, plus photos.

This is all you got, stop posting?


Please post your evidence. This is the UFO "evidence" thread.

Oh, and "orbs" are just evidence of poor photography.
 
How about stop posting off-topic? This isn't about religion or orbs or the god helmet or dowsing. Stop making it all about you. Look at the title of the thread and post something on topic.

Orbs are UFOs of sorts they are airbourne, yes?
 
I was there soYes I can and there's more.
No, you can't. Note I included the word "seriously".

This town, this area is very strange.
The history is strange and weird.
What town?

I swear if you were to mine there with me for a month or two you Will see something one way or another that will blow your mind.
You're probably right. After a couple of months mining and listening to your stories I'd be ready for permanent residence on the funny farm.

I have repeated that experiment too along with the dowsing experiments.
The experiments with the phenomena was, to see if they would be still there after 10 or 15 years later.
I was more ready with the aspect of recording them.
Why do you think I tried to photograph it?
It’s flying, it’s unidentified and the little woman didn’t believe me either, I told her about this place I had lived in before and that I mined there in the 80s, she didn’t believe me either.
The look on her face the next morning because she had one of her own, alone, which scared the crap out of her.
I have the originals.
Stream of consciousness stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom