Merged Psychological conditions are illusory

Jonesboy said:
Hiding what is actually going on is all part of the scam. So we leave out a lot of letters and may even put new ones in. For example, we respell "reading difficulties" as "dyslexia".
Click to expand...

If that's the topic at hand, why start a new thread?
 
Jonesboy said:
Me too - I've never heard of sendas. Anyone else ever heard of sendas?
Do you think the idea could make someone a lot of money?
Click to expand...

No.

Do you think that anyone has made money from redefining words?
 
Twiler said:
If that's the topic at hand, why start a new thread?
Click to expand...

Dyslexia is not the topic, it's an example of a misspelling of "reading difficulty".

Or you can mispell "reserved" as a-u-t-i-s-m.

Or you can mispell "poor attendance" as A-D-H-D.

Or you can mispell "reserved" as twinkleribblesplitter. Twinkleribblesplitter is the cause of being reserved you know. Well, it could be sold like that. That's my point.

They are all misspellings.
 
Jonesboy said:
Dyslexia is not the topic, it's an example of a misspelling of "reading difficulty".

Or you can mispell "reserved" as a-u-t-i-s-m.

Or you can mispell "poor attendance" as A-D-H-D.

Or you can mispell "reading difficulty" or as twinkleribblesplitter. Twinkleribblesplitter is the cause of reading difficulty you know. Well, it could be sold like that. That's my point.

They are all misspellings.
Click to expand...

So, how much research have you performed into these subjects?

You must be very sure of yourself to dismiss the work of so many people.
 
Twiler said:
No.

Do you think that anyone has made money from redefining words?
Click to expand...

You mean misspelling words?
I think you would have to follow the action plan I showed in my first post to get rich. I think it cannot fail - there are too many people looking for experts to change their lives.
 
Jonesboy said:
You mean misspelling words?
I think you would have to follow the action plan I showed in my first post to get rich. I think it cannot fail - there are too many people looking for experts to change their lives.
Click to expand...

Is that why you're redefining 'mispelling' as 'misconstruing'?
 
Twiler said:
So, how much research have you performed into these subjects?

You must be very sure of yourself to dismiss the work of so many people.
Click to expand...

Frege was a great teacher for Wittgenstein, who later followed the teaching better than the master. Frege advised a youthful, voluble Wittgenstein to see and stick to what was in question, sternly and austerely. In their case it was mostly logical statements, in this case it is the first post. The first post is the matter we must see and stick to, if we want to see if there is anything in it at all. That's a privilege given to the first post.
 
Twiler said:
Is that why you're redefining 'mispelling' as 'misconstruing'?
Click to expand...

Actually, in my first post, we aren't misconstruing by renaming sadness as sendas, we are only misspelling. My point would fall apart if it was a misconstrual. It's definietly a misspelling. A misspelling can have extraordinary power.
 
Are you rich yet?
Here's one.
Trolls are caused by LOTR.
Tolkien wrote about trolls.
Trolling is a brain malfunction.
Reading too much LOTR will cause you to troll.
 
Jonesboy said:
Dyslexia is not the topic, it's an example of a misspelling of "reading difficulty".

Or you can mispell "reserved" as a-u-t-i-s-m.

Or you can mispell "poor attendance" as A-D-H-D.

Or you can mispell "reserved" as twinkleribblesplitter. Twinkleribblesplitter is the cause of being reserved you know. Well, it could be sold like that. That's my point.

They are all misspellings.
Click to expand...

so what you're saying is that you are mistaking your lack of understanding of medicine for medicine not making sense?
 
Jonesboy said:
Frege was a great teacher for Wittgenstein, who later followed the teaching better than the master. Frege advised a youthful, voluble Wittgenstein to see and stick to what was in question, sternly and austerely. In their case it was mostly logical statements, in this case it is the first post. The first post is the matter we must see and stick to, if we want to see if there is anything in it at all. That's a privilege given to the first post.
Click to expand...

So, why do you think are justified in demeaning the work of other people on the basis of malicious redefinition of language?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom