Merged Psychological conditions are illusory

My whole point was about the power of mispelling. Unless you want to make money, sadness should not be misspelt as sendas in the money-making program I showed.

Likewise, "being reserved" must not be misspelt as a-u-t-i-s-m in the way I showed. Unless you want to make money.
Are you confusing this a-u-t-i-s-m with the real meaning of autism?

So, you're saying that autism is not the same as being reserved?
 
So, you're saying that autism is not the same as being reserved?

Let's be fair. Could he be saying that some people who are merely reserved are mis-labeled as autistic? Not that all autists are just reserved, but that not everyone who is labeled austitic is correctly diagnosed? Similarly with the other conditions.

He's certainly not saying it very clearly, if he is, but I like to give even the most egregious trollers (and yes, I've seen some of Jonesboy's other threads, so I've an idea what he's about) the benefit of the doubt.
 
So, you're saying that autism is not the same as being reserved?

Of course I am. There you are. I'm agreeing with you.
Thank God we are all agreed here. So rest assured. Take a breather. Our core values are safe - Autism is not the same as being reserved. Granted, it could be a misspelling of some other phrase or word - but not necessarily - but how would I know? I'm not a doctor.
 
I wonder if I could get rich by touting a cure for badmuss?
 
Of course I am. There you are. I'm agreeing with you.
Thank God we are all agreed here. So rest assured. Take a breather. Our core values are safe - Autism is not the same as being reserved. Granted, it could be a misspelling of some other phrase or word - but not necessarily - but how would I know? I'm not a doctor.

So, why do you feel you are qualified to speak on the subject of dyslexia?

Or do you think that dyslexia is not the same as reading difficulties?
 
I look forward to the execution of the steps, to test whether the hypothesis is valid.

When can we expect the test to take place?
 
So, why do you feel you are qualified to speak on the subject of dyslexia?

Or do you think that dyslexia is not the same as reading difficulties?

Would I say that dyslexia is the same as anything? Not me.
Sorry, I'm not sure what I should be saying right now. How do I not get banned here? Please, forgive me.

What I meant to say, I think, is
Would I say that dyslexia is the same as anything? Not me.

Please tell me if I'm right.
 
I look forward to the execution of the steps, to test whether the hypothesis is valid.

When can we expect the test to take place?

First of all, see if there's any businesses carrying on in the same way.
To do that, tell a range of people that you are suffering from sadness, and if there is a condition associated with it that can be fixed for a price.
 
Would I say that dyslexia is the same as anything? Not me.
Sorry, I'm not sure what I should be saying right now. How do I not get banned here? Please, forgive me.

What I meant to say, I think, is
Would I say that dyslexia is the same as anything? Not me.

Please tell me if I'm right.

Apology accepted.

But you're wrong, you did say that having dyslexia was the same as having reading difficulties:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=220741
 
Let's be fair. Could he be saying that some people who are merely reserved are mis-labeled as autistic? Not that all autists are just reserved, but that not everyone who is labeled austitic is correctly diagnosed? Similarly with the other conditions.

He's certainly not saying it very clearly, if he is, but I like to give even the most egregious trollers (and yes, I've seen some of Jonesboy's other threads, so I've an idea what he's about) the benefit of the doubt.


You agree with the idea that autism could be a mispelling? Are you sure you want to say that? It could get some people mighty riled here, and they could get you banned. For your own safety, I would retract it.
 
You agree with the idea that autism could be a mispelling? Are you sure you want to say that? It could get some people mighty riled here, and they could get you banned. For your own safety, I would retract it.

You appear not to understand what the word "misspelling" means.
 
Apology accepted.

But you're wrong, you did say that having dyslexia was the same as having reading difficulties:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=220741

I'll say anything you want me to say. There you are. We're all friends here. It's the safest option. I apologise profusely for my insensitive violations of normal, scientific beliefs. What an affrontery I must have.

So let me now declare that dyslexia is not the same as having anything. There. That should clear up all outragous alternatives. See my post on dyslexia for a fuller rendition of this.
 

Back
Top Bottom