And now for the recap.
Point #1) When you see a cockamamy charge involving a Satanic ritual murder, unless it's a guy like admitted Satin worshiper,
Richard Ramerez, critical thinking demands one consider a prosecutor high on woo juice is more likely than two people with no history of being whack jobs actually committing murder for the thrill of it.
Point #2) Just because one claims to have DNA evidence does not automatically mean there really is objective scientific evidence in a case. You still need to use good critical thinking skills.
Point #3) Juries are not all critical thinkers and should not be presumed to be correctly deciding a case.
Point #4) The evidence is clear that false confessions are not hard for police to obtain. All it takes is badgering and enough time.
Point #5) Not all people convicted of serious crimes are actually guilty. Betsy Ross did not sew the first US flag and George WA did not chop down a cherry tree. We've been raised in the US on a lot of myths. As adults it's time to recognize that fact.