Katody Matrass
Master Poster
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2010
- Messages
- 2,119
Absolved for not having committed the act.

Looks like they are as cleared as it gets.

Looks like they are as cleared as it gets.
"Both the defendants for (charges) A, B, C, D (the charges related to the murder, the staging and the theft) are acquitted, because they did not commit the crimes"
DarthRotor, I consider myself to have won our bet. I look forward to your confirmation of your donation of $50 to the JREF, to further the cause of critical thinking in all areas.
Also: CONGRATULATIONS TO AMANDA AND RAFFAELE ON BEING FREE AT LAST!
SkepticGinger,Kudos to you for starting this thread. Yes Amanda was convicted (in the first trial) for nothing more serious than doing a cartwheel in a police station (and a few other odd things. Your OP created a forum where the truth was aired about the case and in some small way improved the chances for AK to be freed. Job well done by you and all the other many posters here.
Absolved for not having committed the act.
Looks like they are as cleared as it gets.
![]()
Clander said:The words that really hurt me were "per non aver commesso il fatto".
And here is a very important thing indeed:
I have just listened to the verdicts again, in the original Italian and in a translation. Hellmann, in reading the verdict, said the following (my bolding):
This would appear to suggest to me that Hellmann was explicitly stating that his court did not believe that Knox and Sollecito had anything to do with the murder (or any staging or theft). He did not have to say anything more than announce the acquittal: I think it is highly significant that he attached those additional words. I suspect that we will subsequently find out (through the motivations document and other sources) that the verdicts were 8-0 for acquittal, and that the court indeed concluded that neither Knox nor Sollecito had anything to do with the murder of Meredith Kercher.
I hope that some people in the international media realise what Hellmann actually said during the acquittal, and that it helps quash arguments along the lines of "well, they did it, but their lawyers managed to just raise enough reasonable doubt to get them off".
I'd have thought they'd be doing cartwheels.