lol so you think ae911truth does not want to have at least an official independent review of the nist reports.
You are really talking gibberish. Ow my...
Lets see the points they both agree.
1. Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
2. But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives],
3. I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation.I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view.”
4. In his presentation, Dr. Quintiere also criticized NIST’s repeated failures to formally respond to serious questions raised about its conclusions regarding the WTC building collapses and the process it employed to arrive at those conclusions.
5. I found that throughout your whole investigation it was very difficult to get a clear answer.
6.Dr. Quintiere then presented his and his students’ research that contradicts the NIST report and points to a different cause for the collapses;
comment: Its not about the content of the contradiction, but about the contradiction.
7. And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this?
I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”
8. In my opinion, the WTC investigation by NIST falls short of expectations by not definitively finding cause, by not sufficiently linking recommendations of specificity to cause, by not fully invoking all of their authority to seek facts in the investigation, and by the guidance of government lawyers to deter rather than develop fact finding.
