Continuation Part 3 - Discussion of the Amanda Knox case

Status
Not open for further replies.
34,000 odd posts at a skeptics forum and you're happy with a court case where lawyers call the defendant a witch.
:eye-poppi

What's that phenomena called when you reach a point in an online discussion where an argument for one side can become difficult to distinguish from a troll?
:cool:
 
The prosecutors did a great job of summing up the truth in this case:

Hopefully the court will continue to evaluate the evidence fairly (as they have done all along) and not only keep convicted murderer Amanda Knox in prison, but also lengthen her sentence, as has been suggested. All we ask for is justice for Meredith!

They did not address the truth because their version of the truth is not supported by evidence in this case thus they had to resort to the only thing they could and that was character assassination
 
Looks like it's over for today. Really hard work for the court and the lawyers. Blame the prosecution that flooded them with this incredible amount of bullcrap. Maori did a good job of demolishing all of their nonsense.


I agree. It seems like Bongiorno and Maori did pretty much the best job possible. It was always obvious that a major focus of defence closing arguments was going to be the forensics and the DNA report, and it appears that they did a pretty good job of dealing with those issues. But I'm glad that the ToD issue also appears to have been argued in some depth by Maori. I would expect Knox's lawyers to expand upon this issue even further on Thursday.

What appears very clear to me is that by the end of Thursday there will be no doubt in the judicial panel's mind of what the only possible outcome in this case can be. And my thinking in this area is further strengthened by this latest tweet from Nadeau:

BLNadeau Barbie Latza Nadeau
(Hellmann) Said possible verdict Saturday in #amandaknox appeal.

I think it's very unlikely that Hellmann would be raising the idea of a Saturday verdict if his court was leaning towards guilty verdicts. For guilt, the court has to be totally satisfied that the case for guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and that usually requires additional deliberation. In addition, the gravity of pronouncing guilty verdicts usually requires at the very least the semblance of time and careful consideration. It's a well-known and usually-true maxim in common law courts that if a jury returns a verdict very quickly, it's almost always an acquittal.

I think therefore that the very fact that Hellmann has raised the prospect of a Saturday verdict is instructive in itself. And I think it's doubly instructive that Hellmann has raised this prospect before Knox's defence's closing argument has even been heard. I think his court has now decided that there is clearly reasonable doubt. And since this is the only thing his court has to decide, he realises that he is ready to deliver the verdicts as soon as possible. That, to me, is the only reasonable reading of this situation. Knox and Sollecito are going to be acquitted.
 
34,000 odd posts at a skeptics forum and you're happy with a court case where lawyers call the defendant a witch.
:eye-poppi

And that is some 5,000+ posts short of the number of wiretapped phone calls recorded by ILE in just this one case. Wow, just wow.
 
The prosecutors did a great job of summing up the truth in this case: http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/26/world/europe/italy-knox-appeal

Hopefully the court will continue to evaluate the evidence fairly (as they have done all along) and not only keep convicted murderer Amanda Knox in prison, but also lengthen her sentence, as has been suggested. All we ask for is justice for Meredith!

I would encourage you to pass on to Moe, Larry and Curly that, at least in this case, their own scrutiny deserves careful scrutiny. In fact, the prosecution relied exclusively upon appeals to emotion and "evidence" that has long ago been disproved. They have no case fit for a civilized audience.

If Amanda Knox is kept in prison on the basis of the prosecution's -- and Maresca's -- treachery, Meredith Kercher will have received nothing like justice, but her tragic death will have motivated something more closely akin to a lynching.
 
Hopefully the court will continue to evaluate the evidence fairly (as they have done all along) and not only keep convicted murderer Amanda Knox in prison, but also lengthen her sentence, as has been suggested. All we ask for is justice for Meredith!

Justice for Meredith will be done when the court bases its decisions on valid evidence. Hopefully this time, science and reason will prevail over drama, false evidence, character assassination and statements obtained under duress.
 
I don't think pilot was asking for us to worship him or bring his words down from the mountaintop. In this particular case, I agree with him. It was a pretty lame explanation.

If he (Mr Moore) wanted to comment he should have said something along the lines of she lost her temper, should not have done that in a public setting, and regrets the sideshow.

Just my opinion.

EOA? I don't care for labels like this, again my opinion.


I agree with all of this. And might I just add in that .org seems to have devoted a significant chunk of its discussion today to examining Michelle Moore's words to Mignini in ever-increasing detail. It's almost as if they think that this sideshow issue somehow has any relevance to the appeal trial of Knox and Sollecito. It's almost as if they are uncomfortable discussing Bongiorno's and Maori's closing arguments for Sollecito. It's almost as if some pro-guilt commentators would prefer to dissect a minor and irrelevant incident - simply because it paints a particular pro-acquittal individual in a bad light - rather than deal with the issues of real importance. I wonder how many of them now realise that Knox and Sollecito are about to be acquitted, how many are ignorant of that (perhaps deliberately, perhaps through an inability to understand what's going on in the appeal trial), and how many are still in deep denial of that?
 
why?
How did you feel of Maori?

I cant get a good read on any of it...seems they spent 5 minutes on each issue per the tweet!

On Bongiorno, I liked the Hydra reference and the recurring cat joke theme. The impression I got was more of a friendly common sense type of presentation with a bit of irony and sarcasm throw in. A good change of pace for the judge/jury. Maori covered the bases well. He only had the afternoon session and the judge was slow getting back from lunch. Most of this stuff is in the appeal documents as well.
 
Last edited:

Michelle--Most of us here agree with your sentiments and respect what you and your husband have done for Amanda. That said, I would respectfully suggest that you delete your post until you and Amanda are out of Italy. And then, by all means, fire away! Good luck.
 
maybe i'm an irritable grump today...

but this attitude-


....and often there are people whining of being tired, dozing off, its too much to comprehend....too long? like they've been working too hard? its been too difficult for them?

why are they there? maybe a new line of work is better for them.

It is shocking that Marriott neglected to serve everyone in court espressos.
 
Michelle--Most of us here agree with your sentiments and respect what you and your husband have done for Amanda. That said, I would respectfully suggest that you delete your post until you and Amanda are out of Italy. And then, by all means, fire away! Good luck.

Assuming justice is served, Amanda won't be leaving for another 20+ years. That's a long wait! :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom