New video of David Chandler: rockets at the World Trade Center

[Quad4_72]

Are you guys *********** serious with this ****** Grow up twoofers. This is not a spy movie. You are not a lone detective uncovering some massive conspiracy. You have a few loons making up nonsense and all of the twoofers jump on board no matter how stupid, without even examining the claims seriously. You guys are pitiful.

 

[The Big Dog]

Ok, so much for that.

Red, lulz.

The video is supremely idiotic.

Thermite makes light.

Rockets do not work that way.

Physics does not work that way.

My god, the video is embarrassing, and the fact that you don't know that these clowns are making fools out of you and your truther buddies.

Rockets, jesus, I put something hot on a piece of steel and BOOM I have a rocket. Archimedes style face palm.

 

[Edx]

Yep it's definitely "pointed" to debate me.

Im really not sure what you think repeating my typo proves excepted you have nothing better to say Care to explain why rockets were necessary?

 

[TJM]

Archimedes style face palm.

 

[332nd]

Is this the level of jref? damn....

Lol!
Really?
You come here & make multiple posts. All of them get hit the same way (eventually). Yet you keep coming back. Just admit it...

You just want to score internet points. The people don't matter to you. The event doesn't matter. It's just a game to you.

 

[BStrong]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns&feature=player_embedded

David chandler:

"The object (apparently a perimeter wall unit) raced ahead of its neighboring debris, but its acceleration was about 1/3 of gravity. This is an indication that it was kicked downward initially by an explosion, after which the air resistance partially canceled the effect of gravity as it approached terminal velocity. As it fell, however, there was an outburst of white smoke, at which point the projectile changed directions, slightly, and accelerated downward for about a half second at 1.5 times gravity. It then fell back to continued acceleration a little under 1 g.

The acceleration of the projectile is unambiguous proof that very energetic material was applied to the wall unit. What I found particularly surprising is that the ignition of the material in an unconfined space where it was free to expand three dimensionally would provide sufficient thrust due to expanding gasses alone to cause what was probably a 4-ton wall unit to accelerate 50% faster than gravity. The fact that the unit continued to accelerate close to freefall thereafter is an indication of an ongoing thrust capable of largely canceling the effect of air resistance."

Marone!

 

[tmd2_1]

Im really not sure what you think repeating my typo proves excepted you have nothing better to say Care to explain why rockets were necessary?

Ok I guess I'll be the one to tell you...this video doesn't actually have anything to do with rockets being fired into the WTC. It has to do with debris falling faster then the acceleration of gravity, a "rocket" like affect. I was trying to make a point that you say it is pointless to debate me, when you can't even get point of a thread right. How can you debate someone like this? If you really were a "truther" look deep within yourself, the official story is falling apart right before your eyes. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, and look at the responses most of the "debunkers" here give. It's mostly just ridicule and nonsense, you do at least try to make points, and stay civil, and even though you made a thread of how it's pointless to debate me, I do appreciate you trying to keep it civil, at least more so than 90% of the posters here.

 

[BStrong]

Ok I guess I'll be the one to tell you...this video doesn't actually have anything to do with rockets being fired into the WTC. It has to do with debris falling faster then the acceleration of gravity, a "rocket" like affect. I was trying to make a point that you say it is pointless to debate me, when you can't even get point of a thread right. How can you debate someone like this? If you really were a "truther" look deep within yourself, the official story is falling apart right before your eyes. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, and look at the responses most of the "debunkers" here give. It's mostly just ridicule and nonsense, you do at least try to make points, and stay civil, and even though you made a thread of how it's pointless to debate me, I do appreciate you trying to keep it civil, at least more so than 90% of the posters here.

It's more than a little difficult to engage in debate with anyone that thinks these truthbot arguing points have any validity outside of a fictional construct.

This video is a prime example.

 

[332nd]

Ok I guess I'll be the one to tell you...this video doesn't actually have anything to do with rockets being fired into the WTC. It has to do with debris falling faster then the acceleration of gravity, a "rocket" like affect. I was trying to make a point that you say it is pointless to debate me, when you can't even get point of a thread right. How can you debate someone like this? If you really were a "truther" look deep within yourself, the official story is falling apart right before your eyes. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, and look at the responses most of the "debunkers" here give. It's mostly just ridicule and nonsense, you do at least try to make points, and stay civil, and even though you made a thread of how it's pointless to debate me, I do appreciate you trying to keep it civil, at least more so than 90% of the posters here.

So you think that rockets were attached to the debris?

Bwaaahahaha!

Wait, wait now, before you point to "rocket like effect" keep in mind what you are saying & think what could cause such an effect.

 

[tmd2_1]

So you think that rockets were attached to the debris?

Bwaaahahaha!

Wait, wait now, before you point to "rocket like effect" keep in mind what you are saying & think what could cause such an effect.

It's all in the video.

 

[332nd]

It's all in the video.

& the video is idiotic which is why its being made fun of.... well that & the fact that the vid was made for truthers to attempt to score internet points instead of being made to do something constructive, like get that new investigation you all clamor for but can't find the ability to do even with all those architects & engineers that just know the government is lying...

Oh wait! Laughter is constructive! You guys give us that at least.

 

[tmd2_1]

Either Chandler is off on his calculations or he's on, or perhaps close enough to require closer analysis of the projectiles.

Perhaps this the kind of new analysis that debunkers are always calling for. And perhaps if it is, that discussion can be civil and productive.

I'm genuinely curious. I don't have the knowledge to argue for or against such theories, but I do have the ability to understand the discussion, so I'm interested to hear either why Chandler is off on his calculations or how a gravity driven, naturally occuring (as opposed to CD) collapse could produce the rate of speed of the steel assembly that Chandler calculates.

Don't even give them the satisfaction of thinking "new" analysis is needed. The analysis that is out there is more than fine, It wouldn't matter to them anyway, there's always a reason, I mean not a valid one, but there's always a reason in their mind. I truly believe the gov/NIST could say WTC 7 was a CD make up some BS as to why, and they would still believe AQ was behind it.

 

[TJM]

Don't even give them the satisfaction of thinking "new" analysis is needed. The analysis that is out there is more than fine, It wouldn't matter to them anyway, there's always a reason, I mean not a valid one, but there's always a reason in their mind. I truly believe the gov/NIST could say WTC 7 was a CD make up some BS as to why, and they would still believe AQ was behind it.

Al Qaeda didn't attack WTC 7.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Red, lulz.

The video is supremely idiotic.

Thermite makes light.

Rockets do not work that way.

Physics does not work that way.

My god, the video is embarrassing, and the fact that you don't know that these clowns are making fools out of you and your truther buddies.

Rockets, jesus, I put something hot on a piece of steel and BOOM I have a rocket. Archimedes style face palm.

Sure, sure, But what do you know about exploding nano-thermite rockets? Are you an expert on them? Is anyone an expert on them? Other than fireworks manufacturers?

Just asking questions.

 

[Justin39640]

Al Qaeda didn't attack WTC 7.

Still their fault, wouldn't you say?

 

[Dash80]

Ok I guess I'll be the one to tell you...this video doesn't actually have anything to do with rockets being fired into the WTC. It has to do with debris falling faster then the acceleration of gravity, a "rocket" like affect. I was trying to make a point that you say it is pointless to debate me, when you can't even get point of a thread right. How can you debate someone like this? If you really were a "truther" look deep within yourself, the official story is falling apart right before your eyes. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, and look at the responses most of the "debunkers" here give. It's mostly just ridicule and nonsense, you do at least try to make points, and stay civil, and even though you made a thread of how it's pointless to debate me, I do appreciate you trying to keep it civil, at least more so than 90% of the posters here.

The video IS ridiculous, doesn't it make you wonder why everyone apart from a couple of trolls are laughing? This is the best truthers have these days... Is nothing too silly that you won't buy it?

 

[Dash80]

Don't even give them the satisfaction of thinking "new" analysis is needed. The analysis that is out there is more than fine, It wouldn't matter to them anyway, there's always a reason, I mean not a valid one, but there's always a reason in their mind. I truly believe the gov/NIST could say WTC 7 was a CD make up some BS as to why, and they would still believe AQ was behind it.

You say that like terrorists have never successfully bombed a building before... Oops you fail again. I see the fact that there's absolutely no evidence of CD is completely lost on you...

 

[beachnut]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns&feature=player_embedded

David chandler:

"The object (apparently a perimeter wall unit) raced ahead of its neighboring debris, but its acceleration was about 1/3 of gravity. This is an indication that it was kicked downward initially by an explosion, after which the air resistance partially canceled the effect of gravity as it approached terminal velocity. As it fell, however, there was an outburst of white smoke, at which point the projectile changed directions, slightly, and accelerated downward for about a half second at 1.5 times gravity. It then fell back to continued acceleration a little under 1 g.

The acceleration of the projectile is unambiguous proof that very energetic material was applied to the wall unit. What I found particularly surprising is that the ignition of the material in an unconfined space where it was free to expand three dimensionally would provide sufficient thrust due to expanding gasses alone to cause what was probably a 4-ton wall unit to accelerate 50% faster than gravity. The fact that the unit continued to accelerate close to freefall thereafter is an indication of an ongoing thrust capable of largely canceling the effect of air resistance."

This is literal, visible proof of explosive materials painted onto perimeter wall units.

David chandler made a nonsensical video. I have not see something that stupid.

 

[BobHaulk]

Because it's on youtube! Nothing seems too silly for these idiots. Unless someone made a video saying the towers were destroyed by enormous genetically modified cabbages fired from a cannon...

Maybe the secret government hired the A Team for the job. Think about it, they were on the run from the american government, they were for hire,often they made canons to fire cabbages,Murdoch was a pilot, though i don't know if BA Baracus was involved cause he 'wasn't getting on no plane, fool'.
The secret government needed a reason to liberate the people of Iraq and Afghanistan and according to truthers they needed to kill thousands of people on 9/11 in a really complicated plot involving improvised silent explosives and other weapons made in a shed to do this. So the question had to be how are we gonna pull this off and Bush said "If we have a problem, if no one else can help, and if we can find them, maybe we can hire the A Team". Off course Hannibal was dead so Dick Cheney took his place, Face was pissed all the time so Rumsfeld took his role. The whole thing went down smooth and the A Team escaped with all the gold that's missing from under the world trade centre, well i say smooth, Cheney was injured and is now confined to a wheelchair sparking rumours that he pretended to be Ironside and was responsible for the investigation into 9/11 being a cover up.

 

[Sunstealer]

Is it an incendiary? Is it an explosive? Is it rocket propellant? Yes! It's super nano-thermite!

It's anything you want it to be.

Truthers are able to hold several contradictory positions at the same time without realising it.

They still refuse to understand

Fe₂O₃ (solid) + 2Al (solid) --> 2Fe (liquid) + Al₂O₃ (solid)

Where's the gas component?

or the fact that their super nano-thermite only contained 1.68% Al and 2.63% Fe.

Funny how when Jon Cole did his "experiment" the thermite didn't blast the container to pieces or send it shooting across the field but if he'd used super nano-thermite it would have melted the steel, blown the steel 400 feet and shot the container that held the super nano-thermite into the air like a rocket.

Truthers: I've seen smarter rocks.