• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder how they would respond if I got to ask am how it was that they claimed all of their tracking sources were in relatively good agreement as they descended to the surface of the moon, landing radar, PNGS, AGS, yet once the flight officers looked at that "data", there was no agreement at all, and additionally, their systems had located them 4 and a half miles from where "Tranquility Base" was said to be(00 41 15 north and 23 26 00 east)? How would they have answered that question Garrison?

Probably by treating you with the contempt you deserve, though I can dream that Aldrin would have given you a taste of his response to Jarrah White...
 
Words and face don't match

You posted a photo of Hilary and Tenzing after their climb showing their joy, I posted a photo of Armstrong after his Moon walk showing his joy. Your selective employment of standards of evidence defies belief.

His words and demeanor after his "return to earth" didn't/don't match this face. In this case, the timber of a single word is worth a thousand bogus pictures.
 
Last edited:
As I have said many times, I relish the day I am allowed to post unopposed

Agreed. We gave him the rope, he's hung himself a thousand times. If there were any intellectually courageous fencesitters they've undoubtly decided his arguments have no merit.

Let the fool wither and fade away.

By all means Matt, please please please disappear. As I have said many times, I relish the day I am allowed to post unopposed. However, if you do choose to stay, there is that matter of your homework. It is due today as you know.
 
Not sure what you mean mate

'And then I started looking around for a toilet.'

Not sure what you mean mate, so I'll ask you the same question I asked Garrison above in my hypothetical press conference. How would Neil have answered my difficult, but appropriate questions dafydd?
 
Same question for you drewid

So you keep going
when your brain power has failed
We laugh at your flail

Same question for you drewid, my hypothetical press conference above, my questions to Neil, how would he have responded that day, 08/12/1969?
 
Armstrong has never looked genuinely fearful or appropriately joyous to me.

REPORTERS, LIVE TELEVISION, AUDIENCE OF TENS OF MILLIONS. Try and absorb this through that thick skull of yours Patrick.

Armstrong has never looked genuinely fearful or appropriately joyous to me
 
Don't think so, evasion noted.

With the contempt such half assed idiocy deserves.

Don't think so, evasion noted.

My questions for astronaut Armstrong were and are most appropriate. Feeling a little uncomfortable yourself about my questions I see Captain_Swoop. Well you should. Just their asking, the fact the questions have merit, proves the Apollo 11 Mission bogus right there as does your own evasion of these very same questions.
 
Last edited:
They weren't peppered with questions. First of all, the shot there above is from the segment of the presentation during which Armstrong made introductory comments. Questions were a long way off. It was Armstrong's opportunity to simply make some opening remarks.

Secondly, for the most part, they remained this way thoughout the press conference with the exception of some occasional forced awkward laughter.

HANG OVER. When you're old enough to drink you'll understand.


For the most part, all three of them have remained "this way" for their entire lives.

Hogwash.
 
There is no doubt Lick Observatory had the coordinates before Armstrong

Any
PROOF?


Didn't think so.


There is no doubt Lick Observatory had the coordinates before Armstrong. NASA's own documents substantiate this claim. There is your proof Drewid, in NASA's own fraudulent documents.
 
Last edited:
Armstrong has never looked genuinely fearful or appropriately joyous to me

So you've met him? And intently studied every single second of film and video recorded of him since 1969?

And then used your amazing mind reading powers to discern his innermost thoughts as revealed to you and only you in those films and videos?

Amazing. When you wake from this dream be sure to write it down.
 
Never met the man, wrote to him once.

So you've met him? And intently studied every single second of film and video recorded of him since 1969?

And then used your amazing mind reading powers to discern his innermost thoughts as revealed to you and only you in those films and videos?

Amazing. When you wake from this dream be sure to write it down.

Just common sense. We are who we are and not who we pretend to be. Armstrong never walked on the moon, we can all see that. Open your eyes.
 
We all see that you are still evading my question drewid

In your opinion.

and based on no expertise.

We all see that you are still evading my question drewid. My hypothetical press conference, where I am a reporter and get to ask questions as above, how would Neil have answered me? We are all eagerly awaiting your response.
 
We all see that you are still evading my question drewid. My hypothetical press conference, where I am a reporter and get to ask questions as above, how would Neil have answered me? We are all eagerly awaiting your response.

Considering the FACT that Armstrong did walk on the moon, your mental exercise is irrelevant.
 
Just common sense. We are who we are and not who we pretend to be. Armstrong never walked on the moon, we can all see that. Open your eyes.

Considering the FACT that Armstrong walked on the moon, your "common sense" appears to have failed you miserably.
 
There is no doubt Lick Observatory had the coordinates before Armstrong. NASA's own documents substantiate this claim. There is your proof Garrison, in NASA's own fraudulent documents.

You would look slightly less clownish if you directed your responses to the correct party. The post you quoted was by Drewid, and I'm guessing by the way you are scatter gunning the responses you are desperate for someone to engage you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom