• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why does richard gage place the newest dvd on youtube so soon?

^ listen to him. He doesn't get a penny for his advice yet James Randi cashes in 190K a year with his org. :D

Oh, but that's for the good cause, isn't it? Until I see evidence to the contrary I assume that Gage believes as much in his cause as Randi does in his. And pays himself a rather humble salary in comparison.
 
^ listen to him. He doesn't get a penny for his advice yet James Randi cashes in 190K a year with his org. :D


Yep, if the JREF weren't filing its financial reports on time I'd be giving them the same advice.

Oh, but that's for the good cause, isn't it? Until I see evidence to the contrary I assume that Gage believes as much in his cause as Randi does in his. And pays himself a rather humble salary in comparison.


You can assume that if you wish. I tend to see Gage's failure to submit his petition to Congress as he stated years ago was his intention, and his failure to even attempt to organize any effort by the member architects and engineers to apply their architecture and engineering expertise to quantitatively proving Gage's demolition claims, as evidence that Gage does not believe in his cause at all.

But of course, though that's evidence it's not proof. Maybe he believes like crazy but just can't find good enough evidence to convince any actual architecture or engineering organizations, firms, or faculties, and has for some reason decided that continuing to collect names on an Internet petition, make YouTube videos, and give lectures at tourist destinations around the world will somehow remedy that in the future.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
I don't really disagree with your criticism but falling over him for his salary has always a touch of irony in this forum. 75K is nothing a remotely competent architect can't achieve with his normal work, you don't have to found a cult organization for that.
 
If i were richard gage and i want to make money, it would be most stupid thing i have ever done, to place so soon a dvd for free. While putting a lot of years of work, to get all those people to interview.

I really would make money out it, i would at least wait a month, so people can buy the dvd.
Well, Richard Gage has done a lot of stupid things, so this is continuing a long, well-established practice for him.
 
I don't really disagree with your criticism but falling over him for his salary has always a touch of irony in this forum. 75K is nothing a remotely competent architect can't achieve with his normal work, you don't have to found a cult organization for that.


In todays economy even competent sane Architects are have huge problems.

Gage will never work as an Architect again. Any prospective employer or customer just has to google his name.......:rolleyes:
 
I don't really disagree with your criticism but falling over him for his salary has always a touch of irony in this forum. 75K is nothing a remotely competent architect can't achieve with his normal work, you don't have to found a cult organization for that.

Gage is a con man! End of story.
 
Debunkers always say Richard gage wants to earn money.

Well then this is a very bad way of merchandise...

Couldnt they wait for a time, first to let people buy the dvd, before they place it for free on youtube?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ

Debunkers and logic......

So we can conclude, we can debunk the argument, richard gage is doing it for the money

Why does Brand X give away its product? Maybe it is a public service?

Yeah, and maybe monkeys will fly out of my butt!
 
I don't really disagree with your criticism but falling over him for his salary has always a touch of irony in this forum. 75K is nothing a remotely competent architect can't achieve with his normal work, you don't have to found a cult organization for that.

We're just reminding truthers that Gage is a fulltime paid shill, something they abhor when it applies to the 'other' (ie reality) side.

But seriously, since most of us consider Gage to be a con artist, we fully understand that there is a direct relationship between the success of his swindle and the amount of money donated to provide his salary.

It's actually pretty funny to compare Gage with Randi and JREF, for reasons that should be obvious! Thanks for the laughs.

As for Marokkaan's continued drivel, I choose to let him wallow in his own muck.
 
^ listen to him. He doesn't get a penny for his advice yet James Randi cashes in 190K a year with his org. :D

Oh, but that's for the good cause, isn't it? Until I see evidence to the contrary I assume that Gage believes as much in his cause as Randi does in his. And pays himself a rather humble salary in comparison.

I'm sorry, but is JREF set up as a non-profit organization?
 
I neglected to mention that a twoof on the comments section of the new video complained that he's had no luck trying to get (friends and relatives I'm guessing) people to look at it. Apparently they think it's crap and don't want to hear about it!

Awwww, what a shame!! :)
 
I don't really disagree with your criticism but falling over him for his salary has always a touch of irony in this forum. 75K is nothing a remotely competent architect can't achieve with his normal work, you don't have to found a cult organization for that.


That criticism would be valid of large numbers of us "debunkers" went out of our way to deny that Randi, or anyone else, was making a salary off their skeptic work. However, we don't do that, but you do see lots of truthers saying things like:


So nobody knows anything about the financial case of richard gage, but they do like to speculate and to accuse him?

Is this a part of your debunkersbible?


Which, in light of the posts just above his, that link to Gage's own financial statements, is quite blatantly nothing more than sticking his head in the sand so he doesn't have to admit the possibility that Dickie Gage might be in this for the money.

Seriously, just own it: people make money off promoting 9/11 truth, and countless other CTs. You could make the argument that such people are doing it for good and noble purposes, but the unwillingness to even admit this simple fact seems to suggest that lots of truthers, deep down, know that's not true.
 
^ listen to him. He doesn't get a penny for his advice yet James Randi cashes in 190K a year with his org. :D

Oh, but that's for the good cause, isn't it? Until I see evidence to the contrary I assume that Gage believes as much in his cause as Randi does in his. And pays himself a rather humble salary in comparison.

Ow my god, so if we use the logic of the debunkers, james randi wants to make money out this with his non profit organization!!!

Nice example by the way!!
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom